0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,287 Given: 12,878 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,193 Given: 8,122 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,193 Given: 8,122 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,287 Given: 12,878 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,772 Given: 6,694 |
That is Exhibit A on why I kicked neocons to the curb. Multiply their grief by multitudes to get an appreciation of the price to be paid for interventionist policies made by creeps who look down on the individuals that they send to die and kill for globalists.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,287 Given: 12,878 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 19,577 Given: 37,155 |
The UN Security Resolutions only serve the interests of US and its allies.
Russia didn't need security resolutions to give legitimacy to their military interventions in their immediate surroundings when their national security is at stake (unlike the US, that put its noses in parts of the world very far from their own borders), when the goal of their opponents (US and its NATO vassals) was to surround and menace Russia with new NATO memberships in their very immediate borders, practically under their noses.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,772 Given: 6,694 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,852 Given: 875 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,193 Given: 8,122 |
Indeed. But when they lose the U.S, they run into real trouble. And believe it or not: this already happened to them once. In the early 80s, after their invasion of Lebanon at the time. The shekel got much of is value and entered hyperinflafion, unemployment was well in the double digits and the fallout of Sabra and Shatilla caused widespread political instability.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Bookmarks