0
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,537/21 Given: 2,862/32 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,643/89 Given: 5,034/21 |
Some SE asians are more souther than SSA.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,274/224 Given: 3/8 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 27,768/808 Given: 45,142/401 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,208/0 Given: 2,232/0 |
Henry Field found that Lurs from Pusht-i Kuh of Hassan Kuli Khan tribe were more likely to have mixed eyes than two Persian villages and Jews of Isfahan. In addition the Lurs of that tribe were found more dark brown versus jet black with some of the dark brown hair having a reddish cast like a deep chestnut. The single case of medium brown was still found in the Persian village of Kenareh, not among the the Lur series. His observations in Iran were fairly limited (less than 100 subjects each group) but does that seem expected for you?
Hair:
Eyes:
https://libsysdigi.library.uiuc.edu/...toa291fiel.pdf
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,537/21 Given: 2,862/32 |
Iranians do not cluster close to their own eastern Iranic Aghans let alone Pakistanis who are a different thing. Phenotypically, skull shapes and skin tones are different between any proper Iranic ethnicity and Pakistanis who are mostly Nord Indids + Brachid + Indo-Iranids admixtures. For context, major Iranian population centers and major Pakistani ones are 2000+ km apart from each other separated by uninhabited rocky mountainous ranges.
Again, only one pic among the crowds I posted was Persian. You need to read more. Persian is a sub-ethnicity among Iranic groups like Kurds, Pashtuns, Tajiks, Lurs, Tats, Talysh, Caspian groups, Sistanis etc then controversial Azeris who are a strange case. Iranian =/= Persian.
Not sure about the relevance of intellect to this topic.
Last edited by Oghuz; 02-16-2024 at 10:33 PM.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,537/21 Given: 2,862/32 |
namidonam chera ama lurha hameshe ziad sakhte (CM) chehreha daran ... shayad corded+protoiranids hastan
I do agree that Iranians look homogenous. Even an Afshar Turk from Urmia bordering Turkey would not stick out of a crowd of Mashahdis from near the Turkmen-Afghan border. These crowds are 1000+ Km away from each other yet look the same.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,274/224 Given: 3/8 |
[QUOTE=Milkaner;7914968]Corrections. What is meant by those English counties to be as pronouncedly Nordid in race as Sweden or Friesland is not limited to morphology as you want to make people believe . It is regarding the Nordid race as whole and this includes skin, hair, eye colour combine with morphology . In Sweden the Hallstatt phenotype reigns supreme, while in Friesland the Anglo-Saxon phenotype predominates. Frisians are among the blondest people, but they are also blonder-haired than your average Dutch person. Stop your bias and let things be as they are. Blondness of Scandinavian intensity is a characteristic of the whole eastern coast of England and Scotland. In fact if I added red or reddish hair to the stats, these English counties would run lighter than Friesland. With the exception of Iceland and Western Norway, England surpass all the other Germanic-speaking lands when it comes to red hair. Another fact is that 70% -80% of Frisians are either blue or light-eyed. Light eyes can reach up to 90% in coastal region of the English North Sea.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,274/224 Given: 3/8 |
For your information. Slightly over 40% of Frisians ( Friesland province) may be classified as various shades of blond-haired. In that respect, they are not that different from Scandinavians. Nevertheless, typical Scandinavian groups run between 50% to 80% blond. Obviously not all light blonds either. So don’t get it twisted.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks