0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,208 Given: 3 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,401 Given: 3,080 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,144 Given: 2,084 |
It borders on insanity at this point.
Here is Wagenseil’s Fischer scale data for Turks from various regions:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25749062
Here is Lundman’s map you have already acknowledged which counts Fischer #7-26 + #1-3 as fair.
Only 29 of the 460 (6.3%) of the male Turkish subjects were found to present with the range recognized as fair by Lundman or at least close. Given the over representation of Western Turks who have significant overlap with neighboring Balkanites in pigmentation it is probably not over 4% in Turks overall as you indicate.
The issue arises when you also suggest that Finns are only 58% fair-haired by the same standard. 42% dark chestnut to jet black hair (Fischer #4-6 +#27) has not been reported among ethnic Finns and is closer to some Sámi than typical ethnic Finns. The map itself shows a clear contradiction.
You complain that I mix up studies yet you obviously do the same yourself which is hypocritical.
Last edited by Melkiirs; 02-20-2024 at 01:17 AM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,208 Given: 3 |
Please. You are a so-called Ashkenazi Jewish, but you discriminate against Southern Europeans. Genetically the European population close to Ashkenazi Jews (White Jews) are in Southern Europe. You trust more Central Europeans who put your MENA people into concentration camps and committed crimes against humanity about 80 years ago. The insane one is you!!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,208 Given: 3 |
Will you shut your trap when you got nothing to utter? Since you trying to act smart. Let me put you in your place. Don’t think that everyone has an ass big as yours to pull out things from it. My stats come from studies and surveys, not like the garbage that hails from your mouth. If you act civil then I will too. You’ve crossed the line by being a disrespectful fag!
Last edited by Septentrion; 02-20-2024 at 01:27 AM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,144 Given: 2,084 |
Let’s just say I trust observers who are less likely to be subject to OWD complex more. Tamagnini and his colleagues likely had a desire to make Portuguese as light as possible. Even though Portuguese are very much European genetically they were behind the rest of Western Europe in the early 20th Century and more on the periphery associated with current/former colonies including Brazil. This is fair cause for complex. Coon fortunately could see right through this and makes no unnecessary reference to unscaled data. Germans can be trusted to be more objective because they have no cause for complex or insecurity. Even academic training can’t fully resolve bias when it comes to these subjects.
I just added your response here to my signature because it is so outrageous and bizarre.
Last edited by Melkiirs; 02-20-2024 at 02:11 AM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,208 Given: 3 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,208 Given: 3 |
So now you are interpreting Tamagnini’s motives, correct? However the others anthropologists who aren’t from Southern Europe, weren’t ? Correct?
I’m sorry but you are wrong and too bias for any proper assessment. The Portuguese are lighter-haired than the Italians. The Italian average is around 8.2% blond, while slightly higher are the Portuguese at 11%! Your figure of 2% or 3% is more appropriate for MENA nations such Lebanon, Syria, etc… No region of Portugal falls below 5%.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,270 Given: 2,627 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks