Originally Posted by
Nationofsymbol
reasons like sexual freedom for women is the most major factor here, back then women only married once due to social repercussions, now white people got more soy
its well established these looks were common back during viking age, but that doest mean that women would find something else more attractive, for example a indian male in a dominant white city would stand out but for more negative reasons, small frames, pot bellies and weak recessed jaws is not naturally appealing, but as for the rejection phenomenon, as women tend to have much more abundance and can select more in a much more picky context, they have access to thousands of men in just a single swipe, of course the 99 percent is a exaggeration but that was a simple metaphor as to how ridiculous it has gotten, the romanticisms therefore is much more warranted
A Swedish study based on 124 skulls from the 500 years preceding the seventeenth century found that the medieval skulls had somewhat smaller teeth and brain cases but larger jaws and wider dental arches than those of a modern population. 4 Other trends that have been reported include a reduction in palatal width between the Romano-British period and the nineteenth century 5, 6 and reductions in bi-zygomatic and maxillary widths between the twelfth and nineteenth centuries. 7"
i have tons of more sources as to why the past was ten times better, we need an nuclear reset
Bookmarks