3
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8 Given: 27 |
For me, they work much better.
My fits on scaled are absolutely terrible, but when I use other people's g25 unscaled coordinates, it completely messes up and assigns random ethnic groups.
I myself am not certain about some parts of my lineage, so I was wondering how trustworthy unscaled coordinates are? I feel like it helps me, but everyone I used can be modelled with the ancestry that I have weirdly enough, which makes me doubt my research.
I use them for modern admixture. Not for ancient.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8 Given: 27 |
Okay, so what's the most reliable way to figure out if a certain admixture is correct?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,246 Given: 2,529 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,246 Given: 2,529 |
I wouldn't worry about DNAGenics like so many others do unless you have some glaring difference in your composite PCA plots. Mine are virtually identical and therefore I trust my 22-chromosome coordinates with DNAGenics should look the same as IllustrativeDNA if they offered us these-- and they don't, apparently.
Some people's plots might not look the same as mine in terms of closeness-- maybe it depends upon the raw data they have to work with?
How do your composite UNscaled compare on the PCA? Mine look like this:
screenshot software for windows
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8 Given: 27 |
No I don't. How can I break them down one by one?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8 Given: 27 |
Bump
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks