Originally Posted by
Saitama
Do people actually not generally think that it's through relentless psychological media programming, especially over the last decade, to make men effeminate and mentally weak and make the women hyper-masculine and also to encourage both men and women to believe that they are actually suffering from gender dysmorphia? Having a third of your population's women not even be psychologically/biologically capable of desiring sex with men to procreate, or not desire a family, etc... It's gonna cripple population growth and that population in the coming decades will totally fall. Especially if that 30% remains stable or even increases. Take 100 people. 50 men, 50 women. If each pair only had one child, that's still only 50 new people.
If they each had 2, then they basically start back at 100 IF the 100 people somehow managed to have a perfectly even number of boys and girls. Obviously this is more random, and some pairs would have more children than others perhaps. But now let's take out 30% of the 50 women. 15 people. Doesn't sound like a lot, but... It is. Especially when you need women. There are also more women in the world than men, so the number is actually probably gonna seem larger than I make it sound here, right? Those 15 women will never have a kid, take 'em out of the equation entirely. So... What was 100 is now 75. Unless there are suddenly gonna be weird open relationship type scenarios where both men can have a child or multiple children with the same woman... Increase the numbers drastically.
By default, 15 men will also potentially go without a partner as well. So now it's actually 15% of the male population that will not procreate either. Perhaps the percentage of men who identify as LGBTQ is even HIGHER than the women. It'd be even more of a difference. Really, whichever percentage would be higher (be it male or female) would automatically raise the percentage in the opposite sex who would logically struggle to ever find a monogamous mate to have children with since there just ain't enough people of the opposite sex. If 30% of the women in Gen Z are not going to have an opposite sex relationship, but 45% of men are also not going to have an opposite sex relationship... Then there's 15% of straight women who will likely have nowhere to sit at the end of the next round of sexual musical chairs. Now those 25 men and women would have to all have 4 children just to keep the population total as it currently is. You think people are aggressively trying to have large families? Most probably can't even afford it, and most are not willing to live like our ancestors before us, having larger families in poverty conditions and having to bust their asses like crazy potentially.... Modern people are pampered and lack any drive for stuff that was instinctive and natural to previous generations going back a few decades at least...
Total population control tactic, that maybe people think is harmless but is quite insidious... In theory, anyone with a sense of morality would think "well.... we can't force them to change their biology" which is logical and reasonable. But to me, it's been a very long-term campaign of easing into aggressively shoving this sort of stuff down the collective throats of the masses to the point that an agenda has been obvious for so damn long that only the people who are so programmed/blinded by the appeal to morality/emotion/etc will not see it until it reaches such a critical point I suppose. I think that people don't even think about the logistics of it even in such a basic way, or think.. Well, if America's population goes from 333 million to 300 million over a relatively brief period of time? Who cares, right? I think that attitude would leave a population at a much smaller fraction of it's original numbers within a century or less. Perfect if you want to make that population that much easier to control tyrannically and absolutely through force and constant pervasive surveillance.
In 2022, Gen Z's population was about 70 million. So... Figure out how many were female, and then take 30% of them out of the reproductive equation. That alone can lead to a huge population collapse from 70 million in future generations. Add in all of the other factors out there adding to the difficulty/improbability of two compatible straight people from having a child.
Bookmarks