Ask rothaer anything

[Hektor12]

Women should play on smaller pitches to increase attraction of the game I am convinced though. Pitch is too large for us. And 7 and half meter goal. Double smaller goal and field would make women's game better!

I played on full size pitch with a first division team and it all seemed too large for us.

IMHO they shouldnt because playing on standard pitch is what i like about their game. Unlike modern industrial football with robotic players who can go everywhere with unlimited stamina, women's football still has the great potential of good oldschool football. Today, i dont even want to watch matches because its too boring already, one team can easily lock the game with correct formation due to too small pitch and too big goalkeepers. If i were dictator of football, i wuold tomorrow change the pitch standrds to 120x90m and goal line like 8m, perhaps 8,5. That would have a chance to bring old football to us with a lot of dribblings and long shots.

[Regnera]

Do you think she can pass as an atypical southern European?
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...e-can-she-pass

[Mortimer]

Do you think such a thing can happen in Germany too or the USA is "another world"? I think Heidi Klum never got any negative or hateful comment at all, let alone a physical attack?

[Regnera]

Can you classify him?
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...a-morphed-face

[Regnera]

Double.

[Not a Cop]

If you would be able to choose, which one of German kingdoms/duchies would've united Germany which one would it be and why? Not taking in account the realism aspect.

[rothaer]

Do you think such a thing can happen in Germany too or the USA is "another world"? I think Heidi Klum never got any negative or hateful comment at all, let alone a physical attack?

Not common but could happen as well.

Heidi Klum is not hanging around in Germany with her mulatto kids and in spite of that I know that she was together with Seal and will have some kids with him I've never consciously seen a pic of them with her. Now, when I think about it I'm pretty sure that Heidi Klum is intentionally restrictive with showing them here.

[rothaer]

If you would be able to choose, which one of German kingdoms/duchies would've united Germany which one would it be and why? Not taking in account the realism aspect.

I'm not 100% sure that I get your question right, but I stick to your wording. To me it's somewhat unclear what the respective activity of having unified the country means. I guess you don't just refer to initiating a unity and that`s it. But rather doing it and taking the lead in Germany for quite a while.

My ideal would be that no part dominates other parts, at least not in a manner that it's more than the natural weight due to the proportion of population that lives there. This said, I'd favoured neither Prussia nor Austria. The Capital of Germany should have been in Frankfurt am Main, which was a Freie Reichsstadt (a member state of its own). This was also favourised in 1848/1849. Such thinking is well accepted in Germany. Weimar and Bonn were chosen out of resembling thoughts.

Frankfurt am Main could also after a future German re-unification become the legit capital. Of course, first all the humiliating by boot licking skyscapers (Main-hattan) would have to be torn down.

Nuremberg could be an alternative for the whole of Germany.

Which German entity would have initiated a German unification would be irrelevant to me.

[Italicus]

You seem to be a biological determinist. As am I to a great degree. What would you say are the moral characteristics of a predominantly Southern European mixed with East Eurasian like myself to be like? And do I fit the mold?

[rothaer]

You seem to be a biological determinist. As am I to a great degree. What would you say are the moral characteristics of a predominantly Southern European mixed with East Eurasian like myself to be like? And do I fit the mold?

A thoughtful question.

I even do extend the biological determination to lingusitic expression. But: First, as for my opinion it has to be taken into account whether it's about a population level or an individual level. If you have an Nigerian speaking English he will speak perfectly Oxford English if you socialise him as a singleton. But if he will be among his own kind in in hundreds of thousands in an English speaking environment it will turn out like African Americans speak. There are biological tendencies that just break through if they get the "majority" or more correct: a sufficient proportion.

You as a singleton would likely much adapt to your environment like all humans do. Another interesting question would be: How would a population that is put on it's own that is 3/4 Italian and 1/4 East Asian be? We could here just speculate, based on the known characteristics of the parent ancestries.

At a first glance you would assume a weighted average as a result and in many cases this is true. But not always. If you f. i. mix copper and tin you get bronze that is much harder than both "parent" metals. In the same way also human mixtures are not always simply forming an intermediate state. IMO the German people is an example for that. Germans are more strict, unrelaxed and determined than all of their neighbours in spite of being able to be modelled as a mixture of them.

As for your question I think that East Asian seriosity could compensate a lot of Mediterranean "laissez-fair" but I really have no clue what would be the outcome if you had a a separate population with that ancestry figures.