1
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,436 Given: 22,335 |
Not exactly, it was demolished by Serbians themselves after being hit by a Tomahawk.
Anyway, that is the past, now all that is being used to fuel hatred for their own interests.
For now Hungary and you are playing your cards relatively well and are getting "things" from both sides (a good example is those two bridges, each financed and built by one of the sides), something that could be morally debatable, but while there are no more wars within Europe and that hatred can be controlled and directed without bloodshed, it is admissible.
We are all involved in a game of interests of the "big ones", and you, like us, are expendable pawns in that game.
If I laugh when Cosmolady talks about the elites, I don't laugh because it's not true, I laugh because apparently she considers the elites on one side good and the elites on the other side bad.
The intentions of the elites on both sides are the same; stay in power by any means. They are the ones who create wars, and they create them not to defend your interest or mine, but their own. In those wars we will die you or I.
Our interest as individuals is to prevent the elites from directing our country to fight a war. Don't let them tell you stories, don't let them force you to hate. Hate is the tool they use to manipulate you.
And it seems they haven't had to try too hard with you.
The declaration of independence of Kosovo from Serbia, was promulgated on Sunday, February 17, 2008. The independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia began on August 26, 2008.
China builds a bridge, shortly after the EU builds another bridge. "Carrot and stick"
Tools are the same.
But right now those who stir up hatred around the world are the ones who want to rise. It's like when an applicant challenges the boxing champion, who is the one who provokes? Who is interested in stirring up the waters?
If for Serbia to recover Kosovo, we all have to be subjugated by a set of states that range from a ultra-nationalist messianic authoritarianism, a pseudo-communist state that is only interested in material progress while annulling the individual, another autarkic state that suffers recurrent famines a ridiculous leader, another theocratic state with a Muslim religious dictatorship etc...
Oh really? I'm sorry, I don't trust the "new reality" that those types of people could impose.
I prefer the USA, they are deceitful bastards, but at least they don't kill their own citizens by millions during peace times if they don't want to follow their mandates.
They try to impose absurd ideologies on us that weaken our societies,it´s true, but at least we maintain the capacity as individuals to disagree and to be able to try to change things without killing us all.
I would love to reform and direct what we have, not change a criticizable guardianship for another inadmissible guardianship. That´s all.
And I would have loved for Russia to have been an active part in that change, because it has things to contribute, but not through a war, and even less so now, when he is becoming more and more a puppet of "others."
"Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas"
"Dimidium facti, qui coepit, habet: sapere aude, incipe."
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,831 Given: 7,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,157 Given: 5,495 |
Yes, the communist governments of the USSR and PRC were genocidal to their own people at various times 50-100 years ago.
What century are you living in? What relevance does this have to international affairs TODAY?
The Stalinist regime is long gone, the Maoist regime is long gone.
Of course I would not live in mainland China, and of course living in the US or EU is much more pleasant.
(And nobody mentioned North Korea, Cuba, Iran, I don't see their relevance,
we are talking here about value judgments between world powers)
But the FOREIGN policy of the US is objectively far more destructive than China's foreign policy.
Especially since US foreign policy brutality is much more RECENT than Chinese brutality.
The Vietnam War happened at the same time as the evil Cultural Revolution.
Which was more destructive? Rhetorical question. Which involves FOREIGN policy?
In the meantime, the US has obliterated Iraq and Libya, and has attacked Syria and Yugoslavia,
China has not. China has also brokered peace between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
So objectively,
China is much less belligerent, and more diplomatic and constructive with its foreign policy compared to the US.
A multipolar world order should prevent China from dominating the entire world as the US does currently.
This is why the world also needs a strong Russia, a strong India, a strong Arabia,
and other strong Asian countries to keep China in check.
A strong nationalist (non-globalist) US would be fine as well, if they would stop provoking wars around the world.
The EU seems to be the lapdog of the same globalist elites that currently control the US.
Last edited by CosmoLady; 05-20-2024 at 12:55 AM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,112 Given: 11,881 |
China saves Serbia’s largest steel plant’s business miracle | This Shocked the United States!
🔴
🔵
⚪
Thumbs Up |
Received: 325 Given: 237 |
Yes, but they don't build this for you, but for themselves. Good infrastructure is necessary for a good colonial governance and exploitation.
You should adapt yourselves to new Asian values and customs. Workers in "Jura" factory have already experienced it.
https://novi.ba/clanak/96618/srpski-...-gazdama-video
Prepare your Pampers.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,542 Given: 5,993 |
Wow, what a servitude behaviour first for Putin and now for Xi. Kinda embarassing to watch tbh![]()
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks