0
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 4,862/22 Given: 6,424/11 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 27,207/1,203 Given: 13,435/14 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 4,862/22 Given: 6,424/11 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 27,207/1,203 Given: 13,435/14 |
Last time you said that you posted a quote by Coon you misrepresented, remember? Or I should say you once again revealed you're illiterate.
There is a reason no one takes you seriously. Try with a straight virtual face to tell me you're not considered a moron on this forum. I can't think of one person who has any respect for your intelligence.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 4,862/22 Given: 6,424/11 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 27,207/1,203 Given: 13,435/14 |
Yes, you misrepresented what he said. I specifically went over it. Do you want to try it again? Go ahead and make a thread about that quote. I'll post what I said in response and we can let everyone tell you how you misrepresented what was said.
You're one of the dumber posters and because you are dumb you often don't understand what you read. You're also too stupid to decipher pseudo-science from actual science. Your understanding of population genetics is hilariously bad. In fact, you rarely talk about population genetics because I think you feel lost. You prefer pseudo-science (and yet even then you fail and hence why you misrepresent or it's question of your illiteracy).i am one of the least biased posters here and i always use research and findings to back up what i post.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 4,862/22 Given: 6,424/11 |
I said that Coon said that Alpines in France have an ethnic relation with the Tajiks, something pretty straightforward really, genetics is the go to place for pretty much every racial scientist now because they are too scared to talk about race, All genetics tells us though is that population A lived in area B at a certain time, it doesn't really say a lot about race.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 27,207/1,203 Given: 13,435/14 |
He said 'probably,' which means one thinks so but can't be 100% certain.
That is very different than saying it is the case.
And how did Coon come to this conclusion? If I recall correctly, similar metrics. That means nothing and is proven to mean nothing in that there is no genetic tie to 'Alpines' in France (which would be a subset of Frenchmen).
Population genetics tells us the relationship between groups. You can call it race, widgets, or just populations. The point is this is HARD SCIENCE. Whether people talk about race or not is irrelevant to the genetic data.really, genetics is the go to place for pretty much every racial scientist now because they are too scared to talk about race, All genetics tells us though is that population A lived in area B at a certain time, it doesn't really say a lot about race.
FACT: Tajiks are not genetically related to a subset of Frenchmen called Alpines.
Shut the fuck up already.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 4,862/22 Given: 6,424/11 |
We are talking about metrics here and the truth is that certain French are much closer in metrics to Tajiks than they are to Somalians or Filipinos, it's quite obvious and even when it comes to genetics there is evidence of Y Haplogroup R being present in central Asia and indeed in France and western Europe but obviously genetics doesn't tell us much about metrics, body strength, hair structure etc.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 27,207/1,203 Given: 13,435/14 |
You're just unbelievably stupid.
You reference metrics to argue a relationship between two populations without understanding that a relationship between populations doesn't exist unless there is a genetic relationship. Body metrics is very dependent on the local environment (genes interact with our environment).
You talk about Haplogrouos like it's 2006. Do you understand -- you moronic fool - that we're made up of many genes? Do you not understand that we can compare whole populations with each other? Compare Tajiks with Frenchmen. Under your retarded reasoning we should expect 'Alpines' from France to cluster with Tajiks but no Frenchman does and nor the reverse.
This is so shocking that I actually stared for more than a minute. However, this does explain why you do not understand how evolution works. It's clear the English education system has failed.but obviously genetics doesn't tell us much about metrics, body strength, hair structure etc.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks