2
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,428/50 Given: 1,255/42 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 59,298/2,558 Given: 60,463/941 |
Unfortunately, my big dream will never come true. I would really like to go to Nashville, On the Greyhound bus through the USA. I want to see all the big stars Which I always saw in pictures. Then we go to the Grand Ole Opry. To Ernest Tubb and Dicky Lee. I would really like to go to Nashville, Nashville Tennessee. Morti's American Dream
Mortimers Toy: Hit the subscribe button and like my videos give positive or nice comments
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,428/50 Given: 1,255/42 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,283/30 Given: 2,631/15 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 452/205 Given: 822/70 |
Why is Khyber Pakhtunkhwa not South Asian?
Under British, it was part of Punjab Province until 1901.
" In 1901, the British carved out the northwest portions of Punjab Province to create the Northwest Frontier Province (NWFP), which was renamed "Khyber Pakhtunkhwa" in 2010."
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,428/50 Given: 1,255/42 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,428/50 Given: 1,255/42 |
No need to panick. Im in contact with the authors and will provide information as soon as they have accepted my request. In the meantime, using coon as a criterion again is quite bizarre. We have a academic study where it has been peer reviewed, using a scientific model which they have made public Vs Coon. Right, it must be very hard trying to decide.
In any case, OP is a study on Pakistan Punjab and KPK, not India. Even then, has Coon traveled the entire sub continent? Very impressive if he has.
Also those numbers you just stated are quoted by Coon, but it's not his work..
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 452/205 Given: 822/70 |
If you want to reply then answer my question first, instead of replying with a silly question of your own.
My question was, why is Khyber Pakhtunkhwa South Central Asia and not South Asian?
This Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) was created as the North West Frontier Province (of the British Indian Empire) in 1901 by the British. Before that it was part of Punjab under British. If we go by what you said people in KPK were Punjabis before 1901 and Punjabis, Bengalis, Tamils etc were all Englishmen/British up to 1947.
FYI Pakistan and India were not part of Britain until 1947. India/Pakistan were part of the British Empire. Britain is in Europe. India, Pakistan have always been in Asia. i.e. South Asia.
Last edited by turbosat; 05-24-2024 at 07:26 AM.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 452/205 Given: 822/70 |
What is the reason you are so obsessed with eye colour and skin pigmentation?
In hospitals there are posters in cataract clinics writing that people with light coloured eyes are more likely to get cataracts from UV radiation exposure outside than darker coloured eyes. Blue eyes are the most prone to cataracts. Dark eye colour is safer for people.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,283/30 Given: 2,631/15 |
Ofc not his work, as I said clearly it is written by Guha, Racial Affinities of the people in India, 1931. You read post? Yes Coon only quoted this. And not visited India at all. I was just curious from what source Coon took this 12% in Marathi (as it was no citation) and I found it.
Also Guha said that this Marathi caste was ligthest on whole plain India (and yes it doesn't mean he said about mountain areas in NW).
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks