1
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
In your opinion, does Nagorno-Karabakh rightfully belong to Armenia or Azerbaijan?
And what of other Armenian territories in Georgia and Eastern Turkey?
I tend to take the Armenians side on the territorial disputes. I think Nagorno-Karabakh should be incorporated into Armenia with a corridor linking it.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,424 Given: 12,676 |
Before I vote on the poll, I would like to understand it better:
What do each of the responsive categories represent? And, how do I give an appropriate answer to the poll?
Nagorno-Karabakh should be part of Armenia?
* Yes- Non-Armenian vote ... What does this reply mean, and for whom?
* No - Non-Armenian vote ... What does this reply mean, and for whom?
* Yes - Armenian vote ... What does this reply mean, and for whom?
* No - Armenian vote ... What does this reply mean, and for whom?
Thank You, for opening this Thread. I would like to reply to the poll, as soon as possible.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9 Given: 0 |
Here is how I interpreted it: Non-Armenian means someone with no Armenian ancestry, Armenian means someone with Armenian ancestry. So you should pick the options that say Armenian vote since you have Armenian ancestry.
I voted Yes - Non-Armenian vote so that means I have no Armenian ancestry but I do think N-K should be part of Armenia.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
These options are for people who aren't Armenian or of Armenian ancestry. I'd like to see what the rest of the world thinks about this issue.* Yes- Non-Armenian vote ... What does this reply mean, and for whom?
* No - Non-Armenian vote ... What does this reply mean, and for whom?
These two options are for Armenians or people of some Armenian ancestry to vote. I highly doubt there's any Armenian out there who'd click "no", but you never know.* Yes - Armenian vote ... What does this reply mean, and for whom?
* No - Armenian vote ... What does this reply mean, and for whom?![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 33 Given: 0 |
I am generally hostile to irredentism but the case of Nagorno Karabakh is one of the most compelling claims anywhere.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,072 Given: 10,740 |
I said yes.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,424 Given: 12,676 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 118 Given: 0 |
The Purple boundary here is fair, near enough.
It's from the Treaty of Sevres, after the Great War. Notice how the Georgians are also united with their linguistic cousins in Lazistan, partly in compensation for loss of majority Armenian areas within their present republic (whose lines were drawn by Stalin).
Aye, but no need for a corridor. The two territories should be more firmly linked, and indeed already are. My Tsarist period maps don't show the intervening territory as predominantly Turkic, anyway. If anything, there were more Kurds there than Azeris in 1860ish.I tend to take the Armenians side on the territorial disputes. I think Nagorno-Karabakh should be incorporated into Armenia with a corridor linking it.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 118 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 87 Given: 0 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks