1



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 83/4 Given: 124/12 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 83/4 Given: 124/12 |
It's interesting that CHGs score the same type of WHG that EHGs have. And from what I've read the WHG in EHGs has been characterized as a " related (to Oberkassel and Villabruna) yet unsampled Epigravettian population", in turn CHGs themselves are an Epi-Gravettian Culture that is known, at least Satsurblia, and Hotu. Trialetian is deeply related to Epigravettian in material culture. Then there are those that say CHGs are "majority IranN" as if that makes any sense at the least. So IranN just went back in time? If the researchers insinuated anything it's that the "Iran component" they are describing would be IranHG (who were pretty much identical to CHG anyways) not IranN.



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 83/4 Given: 124/12 |
In other words Yamnaya was just a mixture of two EHG groups infused into one.
Target: Yamnaya_EBA_Samara
Distance: 9.3416% / 0.09341627 | R5P | ADC: 0.25x RC
83.0 EHG
14.4 Basal
2.6 AHG
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks