0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,844 Given: 5,100 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,844 Given: 5,100 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,844 Given: 5,100 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,844 Given: 5,100 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,844 Given: 5,100 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 41 Given: 2 |
yeah, you look pretty alpine to me
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,844 Given: 5,100 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,844 Given: 5,100 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 218 Given: 323 |
Have you noticed: One thing I see constantly in the Apricity taxonomy forum sections is that every time they classify a attractive girl or female celebrity they always have to classify her as Alpine. Even if her face shape is slightly longer or Dolichocephalic in nature, they still have to mention Alpine! Seriously!? Really!?
I’m not one of the female examples because I’m a dude, but I also went through something similar in my personal taxonomy. I have been told I look Gorid a thousand times and I’m almost Dolichocephalic and my face shape is oval, it’s not Round like they mostly claim to be (Though I wish, since smaller faces are more attractive imo.) What I’m trying to say is: take the opinions of people with a grain of salt. Half the people on the Apricity are either trolls and the other half just don’t know how to classify anything for shit!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks