Bell Beaker examples

[Insuperable]

I said racial antropology was dismissed because it was not politically correct.Genetic science was not advanced when that happened,just after ww2.

It was however still studies way after ww2. Coon?

Anyway in many cases there are no correlations between classifications morphology and genetics. So fuck that.
I have already explained why so many times.

Do I have to remind you what it is said in the first paragraph?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinaric_race
.........rejected............

[Dilberth]

Modern science, especially biological anthropology is full of non-logic, political correct absurds. For example most modern
anthropologist don't belive in separate human races.
Using wikipedia as source?lol.
Anyway,I simply can't understand if you dismiss racial anthropology,why you write on this subforum at all?
You could chase girls instead.

[Transhumanist]

Man wake up! The CI can change in a couple of generation. DNA is what really matters.

I was ignorant to just how true this was, until fairly recently. You are not exaggerating. It can change in a matter of just a few generations.

[Insuperable]

Modern science, especially biological anthropology is full of non-logic, political correct absurds. For example most modern
anthropologist don't belive in separate human races.
Using wikipedia as source?lol.
You could chase girls instead.

How can you say that modern anthropology is full of non-logic based on pure wishes. People go to 8 years in college and some enter history and people want to go versus them because they do not agree with them simply based on pure wishes.

It is very much important to understand what does that mean when they say that they do not believe in separate human races.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_an..._and_criticism
Read that better and you will see that there are differences between what we call races.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Huma...tific_paper%29
You can see that modern genetics do start to define the concept of race or human subrace or human race ( White, Black... ) or whatever you want.

When people do a dna test you will actually get a percentages of how many European, how many African based on genetic distances. Wow this politically incorrect science actually allows us to define genetic distance, just wow.
WHAT MORE DO PEOPLE WANT?

I am simply arguing that the concept of European subraces in many cases has no correlation with genetics and indeed it has not.
As I have said on some other thread before people have developed algorithms with variables such as temperature, elevation, pressure which can predict changes on human morphology and/or genetics and therefore too narrow classifications are not valid.
I just find it funny that people who are scientifically illeterate always want to counterargument people who go up to 8 years on college.

Anyway,I simply can't understand if you dismiss racial anthropology,why you write on this subforum at all?

I do not know why people are wasting their brain power on this when there is much much much more precise tool. Why not waste brain power there?
Too hard? It is much easier to look at people?

I simply gave an perfectly valid advice as I have said in previous posts.

[Dilberth]

You should make a thread about correlation of modern anthropology and subraces.This was discussed on another thread,it was offtopic,and it's offtopic here.
If I wouldn't believe in existance of subraces,I wouldn't be comming to this subforum at all.

[Prince Carlo]

I was ignorant to just how true this was, until fairly recently. You are not exaggerating. It can change in a matter of just a few generations.

Local environmental conditions can have a significant impact on the development of head shape.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cephalic_index

[Anthropologique]

I just said it was outdated. But i could be wrong, feel free to show me modern physical anthropologists. What i meant was that if skeletons were found now, they wouldn't be "classified", and i doubt people are taught how to classify on anthropology courses at university.

"Physical anthropology" currently exists as biological anthropology. It focuses more on forensics and relies heavily on autosomal DNA data. The typologies used habitually in the 19th and parts of the 20th century to classify phenotypes no longer hold much validity in the discipline. Many categories have been redefined.

[Sikeliot]

I suspect they'd have been more Baskid than Dinarid proper.

[Kanuni]

I suspect they'd have been more Baskid than Dinarid proper.

Unlikely.I'll say none of Modern European ethnicities resemble them at their earlier stage.Albanians resembling them because their remains show Dinarization is a LOL.

[CelticViking]

Christopher Eccleston



Felicity Ward