0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,931 Given: 6,738 |
Not entirely, I believe that Montenegrins do have actually partially slavic blood, which may vary from a lot to a certain individual to none/unexistant in some, which happen to be considerable in number.
But slavs have always had the habbit of assimiliating other populations in close proximity, be them in this case the Illyrians in modern day Montenegro, plus let us not forget that there were practically no serbs in Montenegro before the forming of Yugoslavia, the Serbs today were just settlers brought by Serbia there.
A fine example of this is Marko Miljanov, probably the most known Montenegrin after Knjaz Nikolla, hailing from the highlands tribes that now serbs call 'Brda' clan of Kuci which I believe is completely albanian in blood but culturally slavicized:
Marko was born into a distinguished family in the village of Medun of the Kuči clan (in present-day Podgorica municipality, Montenegro), which at the time was independent from the Ottoman Empire as well as the direct rule of Petar II Petrović-Njegoš. He had a Montenegrin, Orthodox Christian father and an Albanian, Roman Catholic mother.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,099 Given: 5,253 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,289 Given: 6,248 |
Genetically Montenegrins cluster with other South-Slavic nations like Serbia according to MDLP calculator:
[1,] "Montenegrin" "0"
[2,] "Macedonian" "2.5239"
[3,] "Serbian" "4.0768"
[4,] "Bulgarian" "4.7529"
[5,] "Romania" "7.7576"
[6,] "Gagauz" "8.3504"
[7,] "German-South" "8.3714"
[8,] "Swiss" "9.3236"
[9,] "Italian_North" "10.3913"
[10,] "Bosnian" "10.6658"
[11,] "Provancal" "11.7712"
[12,] "Austrian" "12.302"
[13,] "German_V" "12.4511"
[14,] "Croatian" "12.4547"
[15,] "Hungarian" "12.7617"
[16,] "French" "12.8907"
[17,] "CEU" "14.2717"
[18,] "British" "14.4772"
[19,] "CEU_V" "14.5086"
[20,] "Slovenian" "15.5203"
[21,] "Welsh" "15.556"
[22,] "Orcadian" "16.3814"
[23,] "German" "16.9723"
[24,] "Norwegian_V" "17.8723"
[25,] "Italian-North" "17.9469"
[26,] "German-North" "18.0211"
[27,] "Ashkenazim_V" "18.1"
[28,] "Croatian_V" "18.2551"
[29,] "Portugese" "19.0421"
[30,] "Swedish" "19.6094"
[31,] "Czech" "19.7669"
[32,] "Spaniard" "19.8252"
[33,] "Iberian" "19.9387"
[34,] "Kosovar" "20.1668"
[35,] "Corsican" "21.1686"
[36,] "Slovakian" "21.5265"
[37,] "Swedish_V" "22.435"
[38,] "Greek_Center" "23.8168"
[39,] "Colville" "23.9719"
[40,] "Latvian_V" "24.1998"
[41,] "Puerto-Rican" "25.4629"
[42,] "Ukrainian-West" "25.9692"
[43,] "Tatar_Kryashen" "26.3004"
[44,] "Italian-Center" "26.338"
Thumbs Up |
Received: 45,052 Given: 45,102 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 45,052 Given: 45,102 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 517 Given: 623 |
I never said Serbia with a sea coast can threaten the world. The West just likes harming Serbia to poke at Russia. And whatever you say the fact that they lost six hundred thousand people plus their sea coast does do them harm and does weaken them economically. I'm not saying Serbia with Montenegro would be a great power but it would be at least a little bit economically stronger. All nations desire a coast if they can get it just look at Bosnia with their little corridor through Croatia. And remember the Polish Corridor.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,613 Given: 356 |
I think there are not enough states in the Balcans. 4 or 5 more would be fine.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks