0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 50 Given: 36 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 50 Given: 36 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 58,299 Given: 59,062 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,385 Given: 3,081 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 50 Given: 36 |
Ok, for those wondering what about heteroneous IQ, here you go
We always say that east asians have a 105 iq, but it is not really true, they have 100 in verbal and 110 in perforamance, while whites have 100 in both.
Here i tried to include this part of the IQs depending of how much east asian europeans have
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,385 Given: 3,081 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,830 Given: 998 |
23andMe: 100% Levantine
AncestryDNA: 100% Levant (North Lebanon & Mount Lebanon)
ܫܘܒܚܐ ܠܡܪܢ ܝܫܘܥ ܡܫܝܚܐ ♰
My mtFull
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,385 Given: 3,081 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,072 Given: 12,302 |
How do you explain Ashkenazi Jews (high IQ) vs Sicilians (low/average IQ)? They are genetically similar to each other.
SNPs that determine genotypic intelligence are different than SNPs that determine these scores in your table.
For the record, I believe IQ is mostly genetic, but your methodology is bad, the results are also bad. Why should Ukrainians have higher genotypic IQ than English / German? That's highly unlikely if you look at their inventions.
You can't measure a person's IQ based on a calculator result.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,509 Given: 5,744 |
Even if we had IQ datas for each ancient populations magically somehow (IQ test in the mesolithic...), or at least something based on a few SNP's, it would be very shaky but it's not even that here, he just arbitrarily attributed IQ to components based on his own "belief" and reindexed the results. This is the level of idiocy we are at these days on TA.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks