Sexual lifestyles?

[Vessna]

He has a point tho. The main thing for men or at least for me is indeed conquering the woman. Sex is just a benefit, a "certificate" of the conquer.

As you can see I specifically clarified why women leave. I am not arguing why men leave since I am not a man.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ugo]

He has a point tho. The main thing for men or at least for me is indeed conquering the woman. Sex is just a benefit, a "certificate" of the conquer.

Absolutely right. "Сertificate" of the conqueror. And the next day I put her on my ignore list. Especially if you are married....Men who do not cheat, over time turn into shit that is not interesting to their wife.

[Ugo]

A woman leaves a man when he’s a total loser or a misogynistic prick like you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not a misogynist. You can be frank. Have you cheated on your husband? This information will remain between us.

[Vessna]

Absolutely right. "Сertificate" of the conqueror. And the next day I put her on my ignore list. Especially if you are married....Men who do not cheat, over time turn into shit that is not interesting to their wife.

“Сертификат завоевателя” [emoji1]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Hektor12]

Absolutely right. "Сertificate" of the conqueror. And the next day I put her on my ignore list. Especially if you are married....Men who do not cheat, over time turn into shit that is not interesting to their wife.

I think we can make an exception for women smart enough to worth conquering every new day again. This, at least worked with me, im still stuck with her.

[Vessna]

I'm not a misogynist. You can be frank. Have you cheated on your husband? This information will remain between us.

Yes, it will remain between us because we are obviously in a completely private space


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[majevica]

Monogamy is the best, but some people seem not to be made for it.

[Ugo]

When Vessna appeared, the forum became much more interesting. Our Russian girls are the best everywhere!) It’s a pleasure to quarrel with her, and to talk in a friendly way too. These EHG are real people, not robots. I like all the Russians on this forum, except Victor. I even read the messages of the idiot Count Liberissimo with interest.

[Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas]

Most successful civilizations were all polygamous like the Mongol Horde, Roman Empire, all Muslim empires. Monogamous rulers was a risk because the women usually will take over the throne behind the scenes.

The Mongol Horde being a successful civilization is nonsense, calling it a civilization is even highly debatable. It was a successful war machine. The Romans were monogamous, they had one spouse through marriage (having extramarital affairs does not mean it was a polygamous society). Muslims are successful when contrasted with what is the worst time in European history, the Dark Ages. They have stagnated until the present day and continue to live in the Middle Ages when it comes to political and civic rights.

Most men are polygamous anyways thought they don’t do it officially but by being sneaky

Speak for yourself.

Tell me 1 ancient ruler who didn’t have any concubines and was successful reigning his dynasty, none.

The lifestyle of past monarchs or rulers of absolutist kingdoms doesn't matter at all and it is pointless to draw a parallelism with advanced cultures because their lifestyle was not representative of the lifestyle of the local people. Yes, we know they had lavish and luxurious lifestyles whereas 99% of the remaining population did not. You also don't realize that having concubines, prostitutes or extramarital affairs is not the same as being polygamous. Being polygamous means marrying multiple spouses and at least in Europe I can not think of any Christian ruler who married several women simultaneously without divorcing first.

[Ugo]

The Mongol Horde being a successful civilization is nonsense, calling it a civilization is even highly debatable. It was a successful war machine. The Romans were monogamous, they had one spouse through marriage (having extramarital affairs does not mean it was a polygamous society). Muslims are successful when contrasted with what is the worst time in European history, the Dark Ages. They have stagnated until the present day and continue to live in the Middle Ages when it comes to political and civic rights.



Speak for yourself.



The lifestyle of past monarchs or rulers of absolutist kingdoms doesn't matter at all and it is pointless to draw a parallelism with advanced cultures because their lifestyle was not representative of the lifestyle of the local people. Yes, we know they had lavish and luxurious lifestyles whereas 99% of the remaining population did not. You also don't realize that having concubines, prostitutes or extramarital affairs is not the same as being polygamous. Being polygamous means marrying multiple spouses and at least in Europe I can not think of any Christian ruler who married several women simultaneously without divorcing first.

Not true. Arabs, Muslims have always been a developed civilization. The decline of Arab civilization occurred under the pressure of Rome, and then the transgender West. The Mongol-Tatars at the time of their existence were a very developed and tolerant nation. They were cruel - at the level of the entire Middle Ages...but they have never infringed on the rights of the Orthodox. They were very tolerant of Orthodoxy, as well as various nationalities, races and religions. Isn't that true humanity? You again do not know anything and begin to assert something authoritatively.