1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 29,829 Given: 24,541 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 846 Given: 363 |
The Holocaust was a shameful waste and destruction of fine specimens (probably males too but I am not homo).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 846 Given: 363 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,923 Given: 18,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,923 Given: 18,997 |
^^^
These WW2 photos are usually described as "a Polish Jewish girl from Kutno". But when I started a thread about classifying her and guessing her ethnicity, almost all people did not guess her as Jewish. Among the answers I got, there was Ukrainian, Bulgarian, other Balkan type.
I think she does have some Eastern European or Balkan vibes.
Italian-American user from New York, Angela, answered:
"(...) She doesn't look Sephardic to me or any kind of Near Eastern or East Med. I don't think there's anything particularly Ashkenazi about her either. I would totally believe it if people told me she was Eastern European of some variety, especially from closer to the Balkans. If she is Ashkenazi, she's not typical from my experience, and I've lived among them all my adult life. (...)"
As for her phenotype / anthropological type, I got these answers:
- Alpinized Pontid
- 2nd picture eastern, uralid vibes
- Bulgaria
- Predominantly Pontid, but with something Middle Eastern maybe.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 846 Given: 363 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,923 Given: 18,997 |
And at least she isn't a fake blonde, unlike those IDF girls posted by Odin. They look weird, because they have obvious Med or MENA features: blonde hair doesn't look good with Southern features.
Especially not fake blonde hair. Med features + fake blonde hair looks plastic-trashy. And they won't fool anyone because Nordics are not "depigmented Meds", they have different features.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 846 Given: 363 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks