Search:

Sephardic dna is not unique to mexico in anyway, its all over latin america.. columbia and chile actually have more sephardic dna than mexico

Post the non jewish european areas like aguascalientes, zacatecas..youll find more european looking people, the ones you posted look arab

you posted really bad examples of white mexicans lol, this is in no way the normal phenotype of euro mexicans

no its about 50% white then 50% triracial black

The jewish ancestry is overstated the average is very low, similar to the african..
columbia actually has the highest amount of jewish ancestry, remember there was an inquisition is mexico

while that is true, more than spaniards came to mexico, theres french, german, italian, portuguese and spaniard, so it would be wrong to compare iberia to mexico

would there be any differences, the conquest of america happened pretty soon after the reconquista of spain what effects do you think had on the conquistadors "who mostly came from the south/ south...

damn were southern spanish..that sucks.. what about bajio region "aguascalientes, jalisco, and guanajuato"..
is it primarily south ..

yea my moms sister did an ancestry test it came out with 9% italian, also 6% french they have roots in jalisco..
you think that can be actual italian ancestry or just a mix

Question, Whats with the high italian percentage in jalisco ..it seems very clear across the board

spaniards look nothing like greeks, central, southern and island greeks look like italians, while northern greeks look more like their neighbors and northern italians look more like french and...

Europedia ~ "The Visigothic Kingdom was the larger and longer lived than the Suebi Kingdom, and yet the Goths do not seem to have had any significant genetic impact on the Iberian population - at...

Kinda slavic jewish

Columbians have the highest percent of Sephardic Jewish Ancestry, its pretty widespread throughout all of latin america.. except brazil i think..they have high Lebanese

why is it whenever someone has red haird people pretty much go for brunn.. red hair was a celtic/germanic trait right ? unique to neither

Is it a bell beaker type?.. there was no celtic invasion right ..
so is the brunn just a classification or does it exist ethnically?

Honest question i just want to know if its plausible for an unreduced up type to exist in modern day ireland ..
since the brunn phenotype is a popular description for anybody with red curly hair

its true were are mostly still descended from the native inhabitants, invasions didn't have a significant affect on us

of course not but the brunn phenotype is a unreduced up type.. do you think thats plausible?

either way there was no physical invasion, maybe a cultural one but the irish and british aren't "celtic"
my question is do brunn exist since it seems common knowledge now that there was no celtic...

https://owlcation.com/stem/Irish-Blood-Genetic-Identity

idk ive seen quite a few articles that say there was no celtic invasion that the irish and british aren't a "celtic" people..
and...

since we discovered that the original people of the british isles were wiped out by the beaker peoples, who are the brunn.. are they unreduced beaker people or just weird genetics??

the british...

https://owlcation.com/stem/Irish-Blood-Genetic-Identity
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/05/science/05cnd-brits.html...

We now know there wasn't any late celtic migration and the "insular celts" weren't really celts ..
so are brunns an unreduced form of the beaker people ..
If you look at images of "celtic" bog...

wow thanks for all the replies guys