Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Europeans too selfish to have children

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last Online
    09-10-2010 @ 04:50 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    .
    Ethnicity
    .
    Region
    Cornwall
    Gender
    Posts
    88
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Europeans too selfish to have children

    Europeans too selfish to have children, says Chief Rabbi

    The leader of Britain’s Jewish community claimed the continent’s population is in decline because people care more about shopping than the sacrifice involved in parenthood.

    He blamed atheist “neo-Darwinians” for Europe’s low birth rate and said religious people of all denominations are more likely to have large families.

    The Chief Rabbi, who entered the House of Lords last week, made his comments in a lecture on religion in the 21st century hosted by Theos, the public theology think-tank, on Wednesday night.

    Lord Sacks said that faith had survived so far because it could provide answers to mankind’s eternal search for meaning in life - unlike the market, the state, science or philosophy, which underpin modern liberal democracies.

    He claimed religion could continue to play an important role worldwide in the future, by engaging in debate with scientists, by campaigning on issues such as global poverty or the environment, and by discussing the nature of the common good with humanists.

    The Chief Rabbi warned that secular Europe is at risk, however, because its moral relativism can easily be defeated by fundamentalists.

    And he claimed that its population is also in decline, compared with every other part of the world, because non-believers lack shared values of family and community that religions have.

    Lord Sacks said: “Parenthood involves massive sacrifice of money, attention, time and emotional energy.

    “Where today in European culture with its consumerism and instant gratification – because you’re worth it – where will you find space for the concept of sacrifice for the sake of generations not yet born?
    “Europe, at least the indigenous population of Europe, is dying.”

    “That is one of the unsayable truths of our time. We are undergoing the moral equivalent of climate change and no one is talking about it.

    “Albert Camus once said, 'The only serious philosophical question is why should I not commit suicide?’.

    “I think he was wrong. The only serious philosophical question is, why should I have a child? Our culture is not giving an easy answer to that question.”

    He added: “Wherever you turn today - Jewish, Christian or Muslim - the more religious the community, the larger on average are their families.
    “The major assault on religion today comes from the neo-Darwinians.’’

    Discussing the popular secular idea that there are no absolute moral values, he said: “You cannot defend a civilisation on the basis of moral relativism.

    “In a head-to-head contest between a moral relativist and a fundamentalist, who wins? The fundamentalist must win because he is sure he’s right, and you are not sure he’s wrong.”

    He said that although the war on terror had been portrayed by Western politicians as a “battle of ideas”, there is little hope that Islamists who believe they owe allegiance to God would be swayed by talk of freedom or democracy.

    “The place for religion is in civil society, where it achieves many things essential to liberal democratic freedom. It sanctifies marriage and the family and the obligations of parenthood, and it safeguards the non-relativist moral principles on which Western freedom is based.

    “It may not be religion that is dying, it may be liberal democratic Europe that is in danger, demographically and in its ability to defend its own values.”

    Lord Sacks, who has been Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth since 1991, described the modern phenomenon of “angry atheists” as the “intellectual equivalent of road rage”.

    He said that more respectful dialogue is needed between religious groups and the secular world.

    “All peace depends on compromise and that is why peace comes to seem to some religious groups to be a form of betrayal, and that is why peacemakers get assassinated.”


    Source

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    05-01-2010 @ 08:35 PM
    Location
    Nigeria
    Meta-Ethnicity
    African
    Ethnicity
    Yoruba
    Ancestry
    Savannah
    Taxonomy
    Congoid
    Politics
    Yoruban supremacy
    Religion
    trolltheist
    Gender
    Posts
    1,408
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I find it a bit superficial to call people who don't want to have children, "selfish" (and it is quite often heard). Better word would be (self)-destructive.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    11-13-2017 @ 01:12 PM
    Location
    Ripon
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    Great Britain & Ireland
    Country
    Great Britain
    Region
    Yorkshire
    Y-DNA
    R1b?
    Taxonomy
    Borreby
    Politics
    Alt-Right
    Hero
    Gladstone
    Religion
    Anglican
    Age
    35
    Gender
    Posts
    533
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 7

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    White guilt has self-sterilisation, transsexual operations, gay marriage, contraception, abortion and the suicidal election of Baraka Hussein Osama. How long before Asimov's nightmare of I, Robot (made in China), comes true?

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Absinthe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Krisenland Griechenland
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Psychoactive
    Ethnicity
    Green ;)
    Taxonomy
    Artemisia absinthium
    Religion
    Obscure
    Age
    33
    Gender
    Posts
    8,317
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 351
    Given: 49

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I wouldn't say selfish.

    It's just that the Western European lifestyle is by definition too self-absorbed in the pursue of individual success, money and material possessions.

    In South and/or Eastern Europe, they don't have children because they're too self-absorbed in trying to catch up with the Western lifestyle.

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Groenewolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Death
    Ethnicity
    Death
    Country
    Netherlands
    Age
    99
    Gender
    Posts
    3,347
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 27
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Part of it could be blamed on selfishness, namely not taking children because other things are more important, like three vacations a year to far away countries. Or lack of will to commit the time and resources involved in bringing up children.

    Part of it on misguided idealism. Namely giving birth to children is bad for the environment. Paradoxically most of them do not care about the high birth rates among other groups of people. So this could be a form of the earlier mentioned white guilt .

    If this rabbi is right, the neo-darwians are themselves unfit for struggle for survival. Since they follow an evolutionary bad strategy.

  6. #6
    same great taste! anonymaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Online
    04-14-2011 @ 09:57 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Krauty
    Gender
    Posts
    2,366
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Another linguistically criminal misuse of the word selfish. Retarded.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Pennsylvania Dutch
    Region
    Pennsylvania
    Gender
    Posts
    1,897
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    They're fighting over-population.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    11-09-2009 @ 09:20 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Americunt
    Ethnicity
    White
    Country
    European Union
    Region
    Aboriginal
    Gender
    Posts
    94
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I disagree-European populations have sensible birth rates

    It's the rest of the fucking world that's selfish. They are the problem-not Europeans, but third worlders with more children than brains.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    11-13-2017 @ 01:12 PM
    Location
    Ripon
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    Great Britain & Ireland
    Country
    Great Britain
    Region
    Yorkshire
    Y-DNA
    R1b?
    Taxonomy
    Borreby
    Politics
    Alt-Right
    Hero
    Gladstone
    Religion
    Anglican
    Age
    35
    Gender
    Posts
    533
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 7

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Voluntary Human Extinction Movement

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    05-01-2010 @ 08:35 PM
    Location
    Nigeria
    Meta-Ethnicity
    African
    Ethnicity
    Yoruba
    Ancestry
    Savannah
    Taxonomy
    Congoid
    Politics
    Yoruban supremacy
    Religion
    trolltheist
    Gender
    Posts
    1,408
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Groenewolf View Post
    Part of it on misguided idealism. Namely giving birth to children is bad for the environment.
    LOL. I think very few people are seriously into this mentally retarded "idealism". Probably just some petty bourgeois pseudo-moralizing wankers. Or am I mistaken?

    Quote Originally Posted by Groenewolf View Post
    If this rabbi is right, the neo-darwians are themselves unfit for struggle for survival. Since they follow an evolutionary bad strategy.
    (Pseudo)-Darwinian explanations for human behaviour (ethology, sociobiology, evolutionary psychology etc) are nonsense anyway. Too many exceptions for their schemes to be considered "natural", "self-understood" etc. That is just one among many impulses a human being has. But humans can also reject those impulses, no matter how "natural" they may seem, because humans have free will. Who says everyone wants to survive, to pass on his genes? Some don't. Some want to perish, want everything to go to hell, themselves included, not for any "altruistic" reasons, but simply because they want to, out of a whim, or because they are, for some (pseudo)-mystical reasons attracted by the non-being.

    When I say "Darwinian", it is not biological evolution that I am referring to, but all those explanations of human behaviour (or of behaviour of societies), which reductionistically make use of some Darwinian concept to construe some supposed "reality" of human relations.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •