1
asing who admittet never seeing one gypsy claims they are "mixed" and not "indian". i think his impression is from google images, but im sure that those images are fake partially. in what sense i mean fake? i mean they are overrepresented with light phenotypes, to prove that romas are almost or partially "european" in real life i dont see frequently or as often so many light women and persons like on the pictures. it could be women who married into romani families or white trash presented as gypsies, white eastern european trash. the romas i know from personal experience all are dark brown with big black eyes and such, maybe 3 have green eyes but still dark brown skin and indian appearance, they look much more monolith then on the pictures, because they all look ethnically alike and not that diverse like on the pictures.
like random google
picture
reality
random google image
maybe there are light and even blonde gypsies or brownish haired and less indian looking, but they are much less then you get impression if you look at google images. you think that romas must be like 60% euro when most of them have all dark brown skin and big indian eyes (black, and minority hazel or green)
Also here is a indian proffessor who said he felt at home in a roma settlement and that people thought the indian researchers are one of them, why would they think that if they dont look "indian"
Bookmarks