1
Origin of IndoEuropeans And The Original White IndoAryans Of The Cental Asian Steppe
The original ProtoIndoEuropeans were mostly Swarthy as proven by this.
http://archhades.blogspot.ca/2015/10...c-looking.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamna_culture c. 3500 BC–2000 BC
The original Indo-Iranians were a group of tribes, a tribal confederation of semi nomadic IndoEuropeans. The Aryans themselves were a primitive steppe people with no permanent settlement but were effective at waging war, they had chariots and were good warriors but they often waged war against each other, not against the more advanced Neolithic Caucasoid Civilizations who they interacted with.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irania...European_roots They interacted with North Neolithic Caucasoids from a far more advanced Civilization. The Indo-Iranians interacted with the Bactria-Magiana Culture, also called "Bactria-Magiana Archaeological Complex". Proto-Indo-Iranian arose due to this influence.[36] The Indo-Iranians also borrowed their distinctive religious beliefs and practices from this culture.[36]
Now, the admixture components of modern Indian ancestry is ANI=North Neolithic Iranians (BMAC CULTURE)+Post Yamna IndoEuropeans and ASI=Dravidian Caucasoids (pre Iranian Neolithic)+Indigenous/Onge (Non-Caucasoid)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bactri...ogical_Complex 2300–1700 BC , The Vedic people invaded around 1450BC, establishing Vedic Civilization by 1500 BC, it was conflict with the Iranians who dominated the Steppe zone which prompted them to leave, the Vedic people constantly lost against the Iranians. (no surprise, South Asian men are really good at being conquered and having their women penetrated by foreign invaders in addition to having their civilizations occupied/destroyed by them)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedic_period#Origins
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bactri..._Indo-Iranians
Now what did the original Aryans look like? Simple, they looked like White people, most likely a composite of Nordic, Cromagnid and Dinaric phenotypes with fair skin and a huge Nordic population.
http://anthromadness.blogspot.ca/201...and-south.html
"And, as you can see, the model got somewhat more complex as time went by, even without our recent influxes of ancient DNA. "ANI" came to be seen for what it was; a composite. It seems to be mostly made up of Neolithic Iranian-related ancestry with some steppe ancestry owed to Indo-Aryan speaking pastoral nomads whose descendants descended upon Central and South Asia late into the Bronze Age, bringing the Indo-Aryan languages to South Asia. [note]
There they would have encountered farmers of the BMAC culture in Central Asia who were likely quite Neolithic Iranian-like. These Indo-Aryan speakers, likely quite similar to Northeastern Europeans (i.e. Lithuanians), most likely intermixed with farmers in Central Asia and then moved on into Northwestern South Asia (i.e. the Indus Valley) to a pre-modern civilization more or less on the verge of collapsing (The Indus Valley Civilization) and from there; further intermixing with locals seems to have occurred."
This is why I say the original Aryans looked like White Europeans, being similar to North Eastern European slavs but is it any surprise? Nope, the ancestral clades of R1a come North Eastern Europe. The original IndoAryan speakers (the White Aryans) were primitive semi nomads, they inter-acted and mixed with this advanced Neolithic Culture and became the Indo-Iranians as a result of that mixing. The Iranian group invaded Iran and South Asia at a much later period while the Vedic group invaded around 1450-1500BC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedic_....931100_BCE.29
The reason why not many Indians resemble Europeans and are Brown Caucasoids with a moderate 15-25% non-Caucasoid admixture is because they mixed heavily with Neolithic Iranians before they invaded as proven by what the ANI component is.
If you read the link, in this admixture run, the Onge are actually a stand in for ASI here, it's really the Ancestral South Indian component and not a pure Indigenous component like it is on Harrapa. Most South Asians have under 20% IndoEuropean admixture since 2/3 of the Steppe component is actually IndoEuropean. I have more IndoEuropean ancestry from the people who coined the word "Aryan" (being IndoEuropeans in central asia before they migrated, the concept of being "Aryan" is entirely an IndoEuropean one and is not exclusive to Indians, The Indians are simply the only ones who have recorded usage of this word since many IndoEuropeans had a oral history and not much written content)
I intially thought the Steppe component was the IndoEuropean (Aryan component) but it isn't.
http://eurogenes.blogspot.ca/2016/06...rers-iran.html
Around 2/3 of the Steppe component would be IndoEuropean since the Hunter Gatherers themselves were Nomadic IndoEuropeans.
model of Steppe EMBA as a three-way mixture between EHG, the Chalcolithic farmers and Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers (CHG) is also a good fit and plausible.
This obsession with IndoEuropeans with modern academics is pointless though, it only exists because the final migration of IndoEuropeans conquered all of Europe which is why we all speak a IndoEuropean language. This final group also mixed with the Neolithic inhabitants which is why all the largest most populous dominant European ethnic groups all have 30% Neolithic admixture or more.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Fantomas
Bookmarks