0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 610 Given: 2,309 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 610 Given: 2,309 |
Yep I agree. A very significant percentage of Cordillerans/Igorots look very East Asian and can resemble Southern Chinese, Vietnamese and Tai Kadai groups in phenotypes.
Are Igorots even purer Austronesian than Taiwanese Aborigines? I heard the latter groups such as Ami, Atayal, Bunun etc have additional Northern East Asian or Han-like ancestry unlike Cordillerans?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 238 Given: 1,319 |
Animism is more common in Central and Eastern Indonesia for sure.Remember for the most part alot of groups in Wallacea for example South Moluccans and East Timorese as well as West Papuans many were Animist before they became Christian or Muslim.Hinduism had little to no influence in Wallacea/Papua and Buddhism and Confucianism had zero presence historically.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 238 Given: 1,319 |
Animism is more common in Central and Eastern Indonesia for sure.Remember for the most part alot of groups in Wallacea for example South Moluccans and East Timorese as well as West Papuans were Animist before they became Christian or Muslim.Hinduism had little to no influence in Wallacea/Papua and Buddhism and Confucianism had zero presence historically.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 81 Given: 141 |
Neither ngl they don't look like Bangladeshis or Koreans.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 81 Given: 141 |
It may not seem like it because of the skin tone but if you compare them to other populations who LACK the Mongoloid/Tibeto-Burman like Biharis Gujaratis Uttar Pradeshis Punjabis etc, it's obvious. It's mainly in the eye region, the eyes being not as buggy and a bit longer and narrower along with wider set cheekbones and smaller mouth/palates. Wider rounder jaws but that's from AASI/SAHG.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 81 Given: 141 |
Chinese-Indonesians are of Chinese stock/extraction, they're not native Indonesians so that's a different thing altogether.
Also skintone wise for Banglas that's not quite true. Most parts of India from Central India(UP Bihar etc) to down South are darker on average than native Bangladeshis. Punjabis/Himalayan people in India are obviously a bit lighter skinned than us and they're overrepresented hugely for the Indian diaspora is why it may seem different at times otherwise that's how it is.
Here's 100 of my mutuals btw https://imgur.com/a/PPofW8c
Usually for second generation diaspora Banglas who grow up abroad, this is definitely true from my research. In terms of pigmentation, we're a bit lighter than the aforementioned groups.
It's a combination of recent Tibeto-Burman admixture which is a significant chunk at like 15-20% of our ancestry and super recent along with the fact that there was probably AASI/SAHG diversity in the region.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 1 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks