Which is better? A German-dominated Europe or an Anglo-French-dominated Europe?

[poiuytrewq0987]

Discuss.

[Mercury]

It seems rather obvious.

[Joe McCarthy]

The West reached the height of its power from the Congress of Vienna to the Great War. These were our salad days... Then the Germans came along, followed by the Bolshevik gentlemen.

[Duckelf]

Why are these the options? How do you imagine that these situations would occur? This all seems rather arbitrary at the moment.

[Curtis24]

Despite the corporate nature of England's government, I still don't trust Germany as a nation. I know that England and America are really responsible for WWII, etc. etc., but I still feel uneasy with a society that systematically exterminated 6 million men, women, and children.

As to Russia, they didn't commit a Holocaust, but they have done lots of dubious shit to their own citizens such as purges and the like.

Plutocracy may suck, but its still better than a history of violence against one's own citizens.

[Tel Errant]

Both aren't possible, France distrust Britain, Britain distrust Europe, Germany can't do it alone; the current EU situation is the least bad option. France and Germany are the two biggest European economies and their public opinions aren't so much eurosceptic. I vote other.

[Tel Errant]

^ This is from a strict EU perspective, I'm eurosceptic myself.

[Beorn]

Define the word 'dominated'. The last I looked politics was not dominated by Germans, French and Anglo people but by "Finnish" people.

[Murphy]

Give me Rome or give me death.

[Don]

Too many jews in both sides.

Just Look at France and their alternative to Sarkocy, the jew Straus Kahn. Needless to say the dark alliances from centuries between anglo world and Jews.


If Spain would have not suffered the Civil War, the Operation Felix could have been real and the result of the War would be another. As I said yesterday in another thread, the world would be leaded by Europeans, not Jews as today.