1
Okay let's not deny this, this is real history. People from North Africa and Middle east did ruled and raided parts of europe for more than 1000 years although we also did the same to Middle easterners. Roman empire, Greek empire, modern European empires have conquered and ruled Middle eastern people for 1000 years too.
Now obviously calling them European is out of the question since they are culturally muslim, and have mostly west Asian DNA and small admixture of other races but what about considering them as white invaders or is it better to call them Caucasian/Middle eastern invaders? I would do the same with Scythians since they are basically Caucasoid with small mongoloid admixture who ruled parts of Europe, however other Central Asians Mongoloid like Mongols, Kazakhs, Nogais, Avars, Gokturks, Timurids who conquered and raided europe for 700 years (and possibly the huns ) are out of the question since they are non-white and non-caucasian but rather Mongoloid or Mixed. In additition to their massive mongoloid DNA their caucasoid components are mixture of predominately West Asian Iranic + some North European.
Make up your mind. Should we consider these groups as part of White or non-White rule?
Arab empire. Arabs are basically a Caucasoid Southwest Asian race with only 3-9% Negroid admixture on average
Ottoman empire. Turkish are basically a mixture of West Asian, European with small 5-21% Mongoloid admixture depending on the individual.
Persian empire. They are basically the aryans of middle east but their genetics are like Iranic different to europeans.
Moorish empire. They are berbers, Arabs, Black africans. But Berbers and Arabs were the leaders while Black africans were either mostly soldiers and slaves to them.
Bookmarks