Richard Dawkins Attacks Agnostic Philosopher Sir Anthony Kenny, & Atheist Prof David Albert

[Also]

Info:

Richard Dawkins has lashed out at the prominent and highly respected agnostic philosopher Sir Anthony Kenny, of Oxford University. He's also a little too quick to dismiss atheist philosopher (and physicist!) David Albert. Compared to 2006, when The God Delusion was first released, Dawkins appears to have thrown philosophy into the same trash can as theology (despite using it to help sell his book). Why? Read on for links used in the video:

Dawkins attacks philosophers Sir Anthony Kenny and David Albert (Albert also has a PhD in theoretical physics, which even further undermines Dawkins' ad hominem):
http://richarddawkins.net/articles/64...

Cardinal Pell vs Dawkins:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tD1QHO...

Dawkins, Kenny, Williams:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfQk4N...

Stephen Law's blog, on Dawkins' central argument:
http://stephenlaw.blogspot.co.uk/2012...

...and on teaming up with Christian philosopher against Dawkins:
http://stephenlaw.blogspot.co.uk/2012...

Lawrence Krauss on Premier's "Unbelievable?" radio show:
http://www.premier.org.uk/unbelievable

David Albert's critical review of Krauss' book in the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/boo...

David Albert on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Al...

William Lane Craig's critique of The God Delusion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fP9CwD...

Material in this video has been incorporated under fair use for journalistic and educational purposes, and to illustrate as effectively as possible a trend in Prof Dawkins' academic conduct which has become increasingly alarming to some colleagues, including and especially the non-theist and the secular.

[armenianbodyhair]

This guy is so annoying.

[zhaoyun]

Richard Dawkins is the perfect example of someone with extremely high technical intelligence and reasoning skills, but with zero emotional intelligence or social competency.

[Also]

Richard Dawkins is the perfect example of someone with extremely high technical intelligence and reasoning skills, but with zero emotional intelligence or social competency.

If I wasn't aware Dawkins has a legion of fans I would immediately assume you are joking.

[armenianbodyhair]

Richard Dawkins is the perfect example of someone with extremely high technical intelligence and reasoning skills, but with zero emotional intelligence or social competency.

assburgers

[zhaoyun]

If I wasn't aware Dawkins has a legion of fans I would immediately assume you are joking.

From the videos I've seen of him, most of his arguments were technically and logically sound. He is just a nasty, and socially retarded person, which is part of the reason why he is so famous/notorious.

[Manifest Destiny]

He's a sperg-lord.

[Also]

From the videos I've seen of him, most of his arguments were technically and logically sound. He is just a nasty, and socially retarded person, which is part of the reason why he is so famous/notorious.

I haven't seen anything new to his arguments that hasn't been said before, and in fact I have seen unsound arguments from him more than once. I've seen many philosophers, theists or not, saying Dawkins and the new-atheists haven't brought any new significant ideas to the debate. He is more of a religious hater than anything.