0
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,179 Given: 12,243 |
So, this wasn't because of concern.
I'd say she is honest.
So, Geneva convention were supporting the killing of civilians as a ''deal''? Where ?
Geneva conventions think that in the name of greater good some lives or civilians should be sacrificed? In which chapter?
Any civilized person should support using depleted Uranium in bombings
She only made one mistake, else, her writing is excellent.
She wrote in Greeklish, which is Greek spelling with Latin letters.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 45,095 Given: 45,133 |
Of course it was. But there was too much politics/diplomacy/hesitation going on before they finally decided to act.
Of course she is. Are you implying only people who vote "no" are "honest"?I'd say she is honest.
I don't understand this question.So, Geneva convention were supporting the killing of civilians as a ''deal''? Where ?
Nothing like that was planned, as far as I know.Geneva conventions think that in the name of greater good some lives or civilians should be sacrificed? In which chapter?
Any civilized person should support using depleted Uranium in bombings
lol I was joking, you can ask her.She only made one mistake, else, her writing is excellent.
She wrote in Greeklish, which is Greek spelling with Latin letters.
Help support Apricity by making a donation
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,569 Given: 2,481 |
Nobody going to tell me how they will tell the difference between unconscious bleeding Serb from Srem for example, and unconscious bleeding Croat from Syrmia? How will you decide whether to help or not?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 374 Given: 293 |
Ofcourse, if I was to be sure that the enemy civilian posed no threat to me and my kin.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks