Were Nazi troops from WW2 really Nordic races?

[Ayetooey]

was entire Transylvania inhabited by Hungarians before ?

[Blondie]

was entire Transylvania inhabited by Hungarians before ?

Before the ottoman destruction Transylvania was hungarian majority, 11 century:



15. century:

[Carpatz]

Magyars are not minority in the green regions dummy:

Wrong. Hungarians are only a majority in two counties (Szekelyland), and none of the border ones. I don't know about those maps. Here are official stats:

Satu Mare: Hungarians: 37.6%
Bihor: Hungarians - 25.96%
Arad: Hungarians - 9.06%
Timiș: Hungarians - 5.43%

[Dacul]

A lot of the Hungarians are Magyarized Romanians.

[Carpatz]

Before the ottoman destruction Transylvania was hungarian majority, 11 century:



15. century:

What is the source of these maps? Was a census taken in the 11th century? Why does the first written Hungarian history book, the Gesta Hungarorum, describe Vlachs as the dominant population in Transylvania at the arrival of Magyars?

[Dacul]

was entire Transylvania inhabited by Hungarians before ?

Hello Kind Sir,

Could you provide more details to your question?
At the moment is unclear.
Before what?
And inhabited by Hungarians is not a clear term.
For example,if we would have 1 Hungarian ethnic living in every of those 17 counties of Transylvania, so 17 Magyars in all Transylvania, we could say that "Hungarians are inhabiting Transylvania".
Hungarians is plural, so even if 2 Hungarians ethnics would live in Transylvania, we could still say that Transylvania is inhabited by Hungarians.
This is why,Kind Croatian Sir, I said that you could add more details, to your question.

[Philo]

While looking at this Mexican mate thread:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...will-win-a-war
I have started to think, who would win a war?
And after a summary thinking based on the few information I previously had, about Mexico and Argentina I supposed that:
Argentine might win, because they got plenty of Nazis in their country.
And it seems that Nazis are good in war, unless they do not fight against Brits or Americans or against Russian Winter.

Now, when wrote Winter this somehow brought in my mind the idea of Nordicism and Nordic race and I started to wonder, how is possible that if those Nazi troops were such Nordic race, the Russian Winter defeated them?
While the Russia NeoEmpire (named USSR) army handled much better the Russian Winter.
Which lead me to think that Russians are more Nordic than the Nazis.
Now, Russians had also in their army Mongolians and even Tatars while most Nazi troops were Germans.
So, it seems that Mongolians and Tatars are more Nordic race than Germans are.
Also, is clear that Russians and Ukrainians, which were in NeoRussia Empire (named USSR) were more Nordic race than the Germans.

Every little kid with half a brain knows that Tatar and Mongolian winters are harsher than kraut winters. This does not make Mongols and Tatar nordic.

[Slavic Italian]

While looking at this Mexican mate thread:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...will-win-a-war
I have started to think, who would win a war?
And after a summary thinking based on the few information I previously had, about Mexico and Argentina I supposed that:
Argentine might win, because they got plenty of Nazis in their country.
And it seems that Nazis are good in war, unless they do not fight against Brits or Americans or against Russian Winter.

Now, when wrote Winter this somehow brought in my mind the idea of Nordicism and Nordic race and I started to wonder, how is possible that if those Nazi troops were such Nordic race, the Russian Winter defeated them?
While the Russia NeoEmpire (named USSR) army handled much better the Russian Winter.
Which lead me to think that Russians are more Nordic than the Nazis.
Now, Russians had also in their army Mongolians and even Tatars while most Nazi troops were Germans.
So, it seems that Mongolians and Tatars are more Nordic race than Germans are.
Also, is clear that Russians and Ukrainians, which were in NeoRussia Empire (named USSR) were more Nordic race than the Germans.

You might want to learn what a Nordic is. Slavs are not Nordic for one. As far as the war the Germans simply lacked the resources to accomplish their goals. They lacked clothing for the winter and underestimated the will of the Soviets.

[Philo]

In fact, WW2 was an attempt of Germany,Austria and Hungary to steal lands from the Eastern Slavs and Poles.
The Nazis tried to hide their stealing intentions, under the guise of racial theory,under the guise of fighting Jewish conspiracies, for which reason they killed 6 millions Jews, to make the theory credible.
Is very well known, that most Hungarians DNA is of Germanic origins.
Romania did not entered WW willingly,Nazi Germany have threaten Romania to take Transylvania and give it to Hungary, if Romania will not join Nazi Germany.
As for the stories that Nazi Germany went to fight against Bolshevism, they tried to attack first Britain and Britain was not a Bolshevik state.

The Nazis did not hide their stealing intentions, they labelled it as part of "Lebensraum".

[Blondie]

Wrong. Hungarians are only a majority in two counties (Szekelyland), and none of the border ones. I don't know about those maps. Here are official stats:

Satu Mare: Hungarians: 37.6%
Bihor: Hungarians - 25.96%
Arad: Hungarians - 9.06%
Timiș: Hungarians - 5.43%

I have talked about ethnic hungarian villages near in border not complete areas.

What is the source of these maps? Was a census taken in the 11th century? Why does the first written Hungarian history book, the Gesta Hungarorum, describe Vlachs as the dominant population in Transylvania at the arrival of Magyars?

Source, the official english wikipedia:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F...th_century.jpg

The 2. pic from a hungarian history book.

The Gesta Hungarorum didn't mentioned any vlachs neither latin population from Transylvania... The original text:

"Azt a földet - mondták - szlovének, bolgárok, blachok és a rómaiak pásztorai lakják. "

It means:

"This land - they said - was a home of slovenes, bulgars, blachs and shepherd of romans."
http://mek.oszk.hu/02200/02245/02245.htm

According to the writer the latin shepherds (vlachs) and blachs were totaly different population and only the blachs lived in Transylvania. Obviously they were bulgarians, slavs or turkic tribes. By the way székelys were there with huns circa 400 years earlier.