0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 149 Given: 31 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,344 Given: 3,478 |
"Allobroges vaillants ! Dans vos vertes campagnes,
Accordez-moi toujours asile et sûreté,
Car j'aime à respirer l'air pur de vos montagnes,
Je suis la Liberté ! la Liberté !"
Thumbs Up |
Received: 60 Given: 20 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 60 Given: 20 |
Celtíbero Itálico, there is something wrong both in your model and in your results, are you mixing by chance unscaled and scaled samples?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,905 Given: 4,896 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 60 Given: 20 |
The results in your model for Italians are unreliable. The peak of EEF farmer ancestry according to your model is in Italian Jews, while actually it is in northern Italians. Yamnaya is often inflated (just few examples: Sicilians East with 41.2% Yamnaya at 0.25, Italian_Aosta_Valley over 56%!). Very unlikely this big difference between Abruzzo and Molise.
Distances do not prove the correctness of a model. There is a reason why most models are based on scaled samples. The problems may also be due to the lack of accuracy of the G25 unscaled datasheets.
Some of them are not even real ancestral components, like KEN_Pastoral_N.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 60 Given: 20 |
Problems also with Greek samples if one uses your model. Greek_Thrace with 57.8% Yamnaya! C'mon.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,905 Given: 4,896 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 60 Given: 20 |
And problems as well as many Spanish averages.
Spanish_Asturias, Spanish_Barcelones, Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon Spanish_Andalucia with more than 50% of Yamnaya!
These results are not at all plausible.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,333 Given: 2,699 |
Middle Bronze Age North Italian sample:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks