1
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 9,546/22 Given: 9,271/0 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 6,252/169 Given: 1,444/2 |
Sorry, but I got her good on that one but you removed the context. I don't always 'get her good' mind you but when I do it is gold.
Target: Kevin_scaled Distance: 1.3680% / 0.01367992
29.8 Anglo-Saxon:Norse
29.6 Celtic: DEU_Lech_EBA:AITI_119
21.4 Celtic:England_LBA
17.4 Anglo-Saxon:England_Saxon:I0769
0.8 Celtic:England_IA:I0160
0.6 Anglo-Saxon: Deutschendorf_Poprad_MA
0.4 Anglo-Saxon: DEU_MA:ALH_1
Target: Kevin_scaled Distance: 1.3680% / 0.01367992
51.8 Celtic
48.2 Anglo-Saxon
https://www.exploreyourdna.com/calcu...calculator.htm
^ My results are typical of England two samples poprad and Saxon-I0161 samples seem to be adulterated with Celtic but I don't significantly score those.
For someone supposedly so smart she is being pretty dumb sometimes in this thread
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 27,004/118 Given: 30,960/22 |
There were quite a few men involved in the evolution of the submarine over different periods. The following is relating of John P Holland.
This article lists all the history of the submarine and the men involved.In 1896 he designed his Holland Type VI submarine, that, for the first time, made use of internal combustion engine power on the surface and electric battery power for submerged operations. Launched on 17 May 1897 at Navy Lt. Lewis Nixon's Crescent Shipyard in Elizabeth, New Jersey, the Holland VI was (eventually) purchased by the United States Navy on 11 April 1900, becoming the United States Navy's first commissioned submarine and renamed USS Holland.
https://military-history.fandom.com/..._of_submarines
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks