0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,048 Given: 987 |
Economy based on religious and nationalist brotherhood, I distaste global economy which veers off the true purpose of economy: to make people happy. Other than this, one can say the annunakis using humans as mining labors could be true after all, how else can you explain the superfluous amount of wealth accumulation and exploitations on natural resources that even do not make lives any easier and more harmonious with each other and nature? The anwer would be not to trade with unfriendly countries, at least not officially. I would call it as Brotherly Economy/兄妹经济, just not to deal with ideological aliens as much as possible. I believe trade is like marriage, should be contracted under solid and rigorous social and religious protocols. I do not believe in whatever free market or free economy sort of thing, for me it is like universal marriage/harem or universal human organ market, very immoral by nature.
I think we can also review our history in this way, how different camps of religious convictions trade with each other, you can surely find many interesting clues as to how corruption crosses the borders of nations and believes and trust in this way. Yes, it is immoral to trade with anyone as long as there is something to gain. See, how our modern world systems are deeply faulted and ill.
It is not to say there should always be zero amount of trade between 2 mutual-stranger camps, but that the amount and property of trade should be strictly controlled according to a given status of mutual amnesty, and all trades between mutual strangers should be all deal by deal not about granting any favored trade status or legal convenience. In short, the so called WTO should be disbanded forever, all countries should negotiate with another one by one and by each specific protocol for each trading partner. No more global economy !!
Last edited by Hexachordia; 09-07-2022 at 01:34 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,731 Given: 5,555 |
In a country with a capitalist economic basis, it cannot be otherwise - state medicine and the entire social sphere in general are constantly subjected to "optimizations", which creates a negative impression and forces the use of private initiatives.
In practice, soon there may be no choice left, no matter how "social" the state is called on TV. Aren't you tired of these endless collections of millions of rubles for the treatment of children on TV?
Under Stalin, only the largest and most strategically important enterprises and industries belonged to the state and were regulated by the Plan, and those who ultimately produced goods for the population were artel. There were also individual entrepreneurs. So artel production and individual entrepreneurs worked in accordance with capitalist laws, that is, their development was determined by the capitalist law of the market and profit. All other enterprises worked and developed in accordance with the Plan, while the role of money in their work was constantly decreasing.
And Khrushchev abolished artels, began to socialize private cattle and gardens. He thus introduced Trotsky's ideas of state capitalism. Thus, it was Khrushchev (and his reforms about worshipping profit) who destroyed the economic basis of socialism, and then denigrated I. V. Stalin so that there would be no return. After Khrushchev, the Soviet Union became a state with a capitalist economy and socialist distribution. This contradiction continued until 1993, when Soviet power was shot from tank guns, and state capitalism reached its natural evolution to the private one.
So our state medicine is crippled by capitalism, and has no reliable support under itself.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,743 Given: 10,450 |
Free market
Nine out of ten concerns are completely unfounded.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 761 Given: 652 |
It's odd not to see Switzerland as an example in first group
Free market
Thumbs Up |
Received: 18,715 Given: 13,356 |
To not give anything free to parasites who don't work. That's all.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,452 Given: 4,246 |
I have no idea and I don't really care, but I like the idea of living well in the countryside, just planting and raising oxen, for your own sustenance.
More Details about my Bahian & Portuguese ancestry:
Spoiler!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,375 Given: 2,515 |
your description seems to fit more with the social-liberalism of john stuart mill and jeremy bentham before being completly perveted ,only a few people are aware of it
i'am more mutualist/utilitarist with a light inflexion for the social-liberalism of Mill and Bentham
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutualism_(movement)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Bentham
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill
“the right of peoples to self-determination”
http://sciencenordic.com/
"talking to an asshole is like masturbating with a cheese grinder, it's painful and counterproductive" .Pierre desproges
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks