What are the standards for being considered "white" in a Spanish stadium?

[Abaddon]

The average British person scores no African or Middle Eastern/Jewish on DNA tests, whereas the average Spanish person scores some. So yes, much more on a population level.

The average Spaniard scores no Jewish/Middle Eastern on kalkulators, Spain isnt Israel, except if by ME you mean Levant or CHG, but the entire Europe has it, including Brits.

You're probably trolling or just being dishonest, which is already expected from an middle aged purist Aussie.

[Gallop]

The average Spaniard scores no Jewish/Middle Eastern on kalkulators, Spain isnt Israel, except if by ME you mean Levant or CHG, but the entire Europe has it, including Brits.

You're probably trolling or just being dishonest, which is already expected from an middle aged purist Aussie.

The Spanish combination is a master race.

[Padanian]

He passes as typical Spaniard easily because he's most likely, guess what, just a Spaniard. When I've been in Andalusia, I've taken an organized bus trip and two of the participants were a 60yo couple from Chile. One of them was a Castizo, the other a Mestiza, but the travel guide kept on calling them "chicos" and showing as much "racism" as possible. Needless to say, this would never have happened had they belonged to one of our sanctified "minorities" (negroes, "gays")

Let's be honest, he shows minor Amerindian... but his skin tone is quiet caucasian, maybe type 3, and he doesn't show SSA like some other LATAMs who play in Europe.

[Padanian]

No! Northern Italians are for the most part Dinarid in race and a large minority is Alpine in race.

Agreed.

[Pascoal]

Agreed.

LMAO wtf, they are literally one of the most alpine people in europe. It is even in the name.

[DraviXi99]

LMAO wtf, they are literally one of the most alpine people in europe. It is even in the name.

True (Galia Cisalpina).

Sub nordids are not too far away in there too.

Average North Italian is alpine,theres dinaric yes,but its more like a central italian thing.

[Kess]

Monkey chanting is wrong and has no place in football. It ruins the game and it's usually done by people who don't like football and more often than not have black players in their teams.

Recently the case of Vini Jr has caught attention, so the brazilians created this thread thinking this is a spanish problem. But it's not, this has happened everywhere in Europe and only someone who doesn't follow football or doesn't live in Europe would think that this is a spanish or southern european problem.

In the last decade, this has been more common in eastern europe, with cases such as:

FIFA charges Russia over racist chants against France's black players

Dutch Euro 2012 squad face ‘monkey chants’ in Poland

A Bulgaria crowd appeared to make monkey chants and Nazi salutes at England's black players, and the team's captain begged the fans to stop

A Lithuanian Basketball Fan Was Arrested During a Game Against Nigeria For Starting Racist "Monkey Chants"

But not only in Eastern Europe, for example in England as well and John Barnes was famously thrown bananas at and suffered racial abuse when he played.

But i don't know if these people are also mad that people in other countries are lighter than them, and so direct their racial frustrations at black players like it's being suggested in this thread that it's the case with the spanish. Could be...

https://amp.marca.com/en/football/ma...9648b460c.html

Just a side note, Eric Cantona, who is a white guy, has been the victim of racism in England.

Not just black, white etc. Nationalistic racism also exists in football and each kind of racism has no place in football.

[Creoda]

https://amp.marca.com/en/football/ma...9648b460c.html

Just a side note, Eric Cantona, who is a white guy, has been the victim of racism in England.

Not just black, white etc. Nationalistic racism also exists in football and each kind of racism has no place in football.

Matthew Simmons, the abusive Crystal Palace fan, supposedly said 'Fuck off back to France, you French bastard' lol. Kind of revisionist to call that racism - and I like Cantona. Either way there is far too much hysteria about racial abuse in football, as opposed to any other kind of abuse. Verbal abuse of players is part of the game, the fans who pay the players wages should able to express themselves. And many precious modern overpaid primadonna footballers deserve abuse.

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

Historically, the British and Spanish were the opposites when it came to their relationships with subject peoples: the Spaniards mixed a lot in their colonies but were vigorously opposed to it at home (the Inquisition etc), whereas the British tried to forbid it in their colonies but were relatively tolerant about it at home. (Even Queen Victoria is alleged to have had an affair with an Indian consort). Therefore, perhaps we can still see residues of this dichotomy in both countries even today.

Rubbish. The British govt didn't try to forbid mixing in North America and Australia, the British people in those colonies just weren't interested in mixing. If you knew about the history of the East India Company, there was a lot of mixing with Indians there. And the Spanish in Spain have much more non-European blood than the British in Britain as well.

The above is an example of two morons disagreeing and both being wrong (because they're morons).

Amerindians in modern-day USA and Canada (Lakota, Cherokee, etc.) are heavily mixed with European ancestry. So obviously there was interest considering these populations are so heavily mixed. The gene flow went in one direction and that's easily explained. The British colonials found it disdainful to have Amerindian ancestry but it was no different than how Spaniards thought as well. The difference is the Spanish colonists were disproportionately male, while British colonists were not.

Men like to have sex. If they can't get it from one of their own, they'll get it from women from another group and even with the option of getting sex from their own they'll get sex from women from another group if they're able as shown not only in the heavy European admixture that most Native American groups have but also revealed in the European admixture of Black Americans.

There is "residues of this dichotomy" because it's dependent on circumstances. As the autist pointed out men from the East Indian Company were banging Indian women.

[Tooting Carmen]

The above is an example of two morons disagreeing and both being wrong (because they're morons).

Amerindians in modern-day USA and Canada (Lakota, Cherokee, etc.) are heavily mixed with European ancestry. So obviously there was interest considering these populations are so heavily mixed. The gene flow went in one direction and that's easily explained. The British colonials found it disdainful to have Amerindian ancestry but it was no different than how Spaniards thought as well. The difference is the Spanish colonists were disproportionately male, while British colonists were not.

Men like to have sex. If they can't get it from one of their own, they'll get it from women from another group and even with the option of getting sex from their own they'll get sex from women from another group if they're able as shown not only in the heavy European admixture that most Native American groups have but also revealed in the European admixture of Black Americans.

There is "residues of this dichotomy" because it's dependent on circumstances. As the autist pointed out men from the East Indian Company were banging Indian women.

The interracial gangbang in India only really happened right at the beginning of the East India Company's arrival. The mass arrivals of memsahibs vastly changed the dynamic. Furthermore, while not as rigid as Jim Crow or Apartheid themselves, there were already informal and semi-formal colour bars introduced all across the British Empire including India, even to the point where railway platforms became racially segregated.