Putin proposes setting up 'Eurasian Union'

**Sarmatian** · 03-25-2012, 07:36 AM

Originally Posted by Joe McCarthy

...America's failure to assume its natural hegemonic position...

This is a good example of self-proclaimed US 'superiority'. Do you realize there are at least 5 billion people in this world do not agree with this. And don't even think to portray all of them as Muslim extremists, neo-Nazis, Communists or Anarchists.

The higher you Americans fly in your illusions of superiority the harder it will be for you to fall down. It will happens much sooner than you think.

**The Lawspeaker** · 03-25-2012, 07:43 AM

The sooner the better.

**~~Joe McCarthy~~** · 03-25-2012, 11:36 AM

Originally Posted by Civis Batavi

Yes.. under American pressure. Another odd detail: did you know that the Eastern Block states were not forced by the Soviets to go to Korea ?

That's because Stalin was trying to keep a low profile and pretend not to be involved himself. He wouldn't even officially inject Soviet troops. Why would he direct Bulgarians to the front?

**~~Joe McCarthy~~** · 03-25-2012, 11:43 AM

Originally Posted by Sarmatian

This is a good example of self-proclaimed US 'superiority'. Do you realize there are at least 5 billion people in this world do not agree with this. And don't even think to portray all of them as Muslim extremists, neo-Nazis, Communists or Anarchists.

The higher you Americans fly in your illusions of superiority the harder it will be for you to fall down. It will happens much sooner than you think.

Why would we apologize for being naturally stronger than anyone else? Someone has to be the strongest, and if it weren't us it'd be people like Indians or Chinese.

**The Lawspeaker** · 03-25-2012, 02:39 PM

Originally Posted by Joe McCarthy

That's because Stalin was trying to keep a low profile and pretend not to be involved himself. He wouldn't even officially inject Soviet troops. Why would he direct Bulgarians to the front?

You do realise that there were some Soviets in Korea at that time ?

**purple** · 03-25-2012, 02:55 PM

What is that Eurasian Union for?
Is it like the European Union..Is it like NATO? Whatever it is, it has the same purpose...just wars and wars and global power.

**~~Geronimo~~** · 03-25-2012, 03:15 PM

What a brilliant idea !!!

**Sarmatian** · 03-25-2012, 03:22 PM

Originally Posted by Joe McCarthy

Why would we apologize for being naturally stronger than anyone else? Someone has to be the strongest, and if it weren't us it'd be people like Indians or Chinese.

Are you even aware of parasitic nature of US strength? Do you understand that to sustain this strength you robbing millions of people in other parts of the world? You pretty much copied British imperialistic colonial policy of sucking resources out of others, wrapped it into nice-looking excuses and rolling all over the world in search of someone to strip.

At least Soviet Union was built using exclusively internal resources.

**Artaxat** · 03-25-2012, 03:39 PM

This is a very important topic. The declaration of Eurasian Union project, even if not currently accepted by all member states, will define the policies of Russia for the coming years since the goal will be to achieve this political and economic map.

The Geo political consequence will be many and diverse upon other union like the European Union, Arab Union, China, India, Japan and of course USA with its own aspiriation in Central Asia.

This is a sign that the coming years are years full of clashes.

**beaver** · 03-25-2012, 03:40 PM

Originally Posted by Joe McCarthy View Post
Why would we apologize for being naturally stronger than anyone else? Someone has to be the strongest, and if it weren't us it'd be people like Indians or Chinese.

Indians and Pakies get now the best positions in the Silikon walley (and in Boston and in the state Washington). They are stronger than Anglo-Saxes. What are you talking about?