0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,903 Given: 6,212 |
Fair point. Although, I wrote it to avoid the assumption that the map is infallible. However, given the complexity of early human migrations, encountering speculations and inaccuracies is to be expected. After all, genetically there isn't a distinct line between East and West Eurasians anyway.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,153 Given: 366 |
Mixed Caucasoid.
I don't know about gypsies from other countries but the Czech and Slovak ones that I am most familiar with really are a mixed bag. You have some straight up Indian looking motherfuckers but also blonde and blue-eyed ones that would pass as full Europeans. So I'm going to go with mixed Caucasoid.
It's Modelo Negra time
Thumbs Up |
Received: 58,414 Given: 59,207 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,153 Given: 366 |
I agree that it doesn't disqualify, I suppose I could have said what I meant better. There is so much admixture in gypsies from where I'm from that they are just a mixed bag. They are not all the way Indian, and they are not all the way European, but both of those groups are Caucasoid - so they are Caucasoids who are not easily classified into a particular "type" of Caucasoid.
It's Modelo Negra time
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,355 Given: 4,661 |
We describe them broadly as gypsy already, its their race.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,426 Given: 4,139 |
I honestly think that gypsies look closest to Pakistanis by far. Some less south Asian looking look more like Kurds or Europeans from the balkans. Most look like mixes obviously.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,611 Given: 5,414 |
Parasites.
Runen raunen rechten Rat, über eiserne Felder nun zur Tat!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21,151 Given: 11,139 |
Gypsies can't be considered fully Caucasoid, since I've seen photos of Gypsies with Australoid admixture.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks