Ideology and Racial Differences?

[Voskos]

There are inherent physical, mental, and psychological differences between the various human races.

There are inherent physical, mental, and psychological differences between men and women.

Unless your IQ is less than 85, you can control any impulse you have and choose to be a good person who rationally sorts through their feelings.

The equality of races (or of sexes) depends largely on the willingness of the people desiring to be equal.

My IQ is around 97-103, I think i'm slightly retarded compared to people from the west (usually they're closer to the 110-120 range) that's why I love to shit post and troll all the time.

[Mortimer]

300 Arabs conquered Spain? Where do you get that b.s. from? Probably from some random Muslim poster here or some other forum on the internet. I am almost sure it wasn't like that.

Yes i read it somewhere

[tropicalslavic]

I never denied differences read my OP but there is a broad spectrum of human diversity like you too mention differences between men and women i also do not think its good that we are really all equal like in a totalitarian state but i base it on the whole spectrum of humanity and individuality its actually racists who divide people in a few like 5 or 10 large groups and homogenise those groups as oppossed to eatch other

I think everyone should have the same legal rights.

But for example... it's quite funny seeing thuggish black people complain about not being seen as equal to white people. NO SHIT. When they are choosing to act like they are lesser, completely of their own free will.

I do have to put some of the blame on minorities because often it really is their own culture that they insist on never changing or adapting to a more modern and civilized way of thinking, that is holding them back.

I don't really blame the average white racist who is not very racist for noticing these patterns and being cautious of entire groups of people who, on average, choose of their own free will to act thuggish.

[Straightman]

I certainly don't think that colonialism is the be all and end all explanation. However, it is rather convenient and hypocritical to blame all of Romania's pre-Communist problems on the Ottomans, yet you would never entertain the fact that Western colonialism may have been part of the problem (not the only problem, no, but certainly part of it) in much of the Global South, would you? As for "places being left alone", only Japan, Korea, Mongolia, Thailand, Liberia (albeit founded by freed American slaves) and Ethiopia (before Mussolini's invasion) were never invaded by a European power.

But what were they doing until Europeans came to town in the early modern period? What great things were Africans doing for example? Were they on the same level of civilization as Europe or Oriental civilizations? And why did colonialism somehow made their birth rate eventually increase greatly by the end of the period in the 50s and 60s? Was colonialism entirely bad ? What about modern medicine, education and industry that were brought there by Europeans? Sure they exploited the natives and their land's resources, but how did they made things worse than they were? In reality the worse thing is exactly their out of control population growth which causes more poverty and misery there. And civil wars and tribal wars were already a thing there. That is how they got enslaved people to sell to Europeans. It's independence, African misrule of Africans, high birth rate and tribal wars that make Africa the way it is, not European colonialism. If European colonialism was bad too, they never knew any better rulers in their past or present. And some fools blame the pope for Africans not using birth control methods, which causes AIDS, stds and overpopulation too, as if one is to believe even nominally Catholic Africans are so devout to not use condoms but still have sex with whoever they can!lol And it is Ottomans that are to blame for Balkans and Romania being more backward together with communism later.

[Mortimer]

I think everyone should have the same legal rights.

But for example... it's quite funny seeing thuggish black people complain about not being seen as equal to white people. NO SHIT. When they are choosing to act like they are lesser, completely of their own free will.

I do have to put some of the blame on minorities because often it really is their own culture that they insist on never changing or adapting to a more modern and civilized way of thinking, that is holding them back.

I don't really blame the average white racist who is not very racist for noticing these patterns and being cautious of entire groups of people who, on average, choose of their own free will to act thuggish.

That is because white people are globally still the default people because of historical developments so basically they are the observers and judges and decide who acts thuggish or uncivilised they study other people the others are always in the give situation or need to prove something some groups more then others though but i do not deny your argument either its true too and i could not denie it myself if a thugg hits me for example i think our arguments co exist

[Petalpusher]

No one is completely unbiased. They do it because they want to show what they think is the truth. They want to show the world something they consider very important, because it explains much about why the world is the way it is. If they are wrong, I still don't think they do it knowing they are wrong and just to make other races look bad or theirs look good.

Lynn has published a lot along with other intelligence specialists that have the same findings, it's all peer reviewed and very much based on scientific principles. Yet all of a sudden it's not a conspiracy at all anymore when East Asians are found to have slightly higher average IQ (although with different both lower and upper end deviation). How convenient.

Europeans didn't nearly invent everything in the world by just magically manifest it in studies. People have personal opinions but white culture is deeply impregnated by scientific methodology above all, truth and facts are an integral part of it, and this is also what enabled it to be that succesful in the last centuries. As we say nuclear reactors don't fire up with feelings, nor you can falsify that. We had to conform to reality wether we wanted it or not, strip off some archaic beliefs, even some religious ones. Some will deny the undeniable when they just have to look around...Maybe for us up to a fault at some point, as we now worship science so much we see it as an infaillible God that will always show us the path ahead, but that's another matter and a rich's man problem. It's probably a better problem to have than still living like in the pleistocene and dying from hunger.

Moreover, i think this is actually the thing all sorts of minorities really don't understand nowadays. Fine you want so bad to live with us but then you ll have to live up to our expectations of logic and reason, at least. We know advanced civilization relies on that and without it will crumble apart quickly.

[Mortimer]

Lynn has published a lot along with other intelligence specialists that have the same findings, it's all peer reviewed and very much based on scientific principles. Yet all of a sudden it's not a conspiracy at all anymore when East Asians are found to have slightly higher average IQ (although with different both lower and upper end deviation). How convenient.

Europeans didn't nearly invent everything in the world by just magically manifest it in studies. People have personal opinions but white culture is deeply impregnated by scientific methodology above all, truth and facts are an integral part of it, and this is also what enabled it to be that succesful in the last centuries. As we say nuclear reactors don't fire up with feelings, nor you can falsify that. We had to conform to reality wether we wanted it or not, strip off some archaic beliefs, even some religious ones. Some will deny the undeniable when they just have to look around...Maybe for us up to a fault at some point, as we now worship science so much we see it as an infaillible God that will always show us the path ahead, but that's another matter and a rich's man problem. It's probably a better problem to have than still living like in the pleistocene and dying from hunger.

Moreover, i think this is actually the thing all sorts of minorities really don't understand nowadays. Fine you want so bad to live with us but then you ll have to live up to our expectations of logic and reason, at least. We know advanced civilization relies on that and without it will crumble apart quickly.

I do not think that east asians have high IQs is new or contradictory to white supremacy white supremacists since always believed in east asian ability to copy but they do not invent like whites still even for the nazis honorary aryans

[Tooting Carmen]

But what were they doing until Europeans came to town in the early modern period? What great things were Africans doing for example? Were they on the same level of civilization as Europe or Oriental civilizations? And why did colonialism somehow made their birth rate eventually increase greatly by the end of the period in the 50s and 60s? Was colonialism entirely bad ? What about modern medicine, education and industry that were brought there by Europeans? Sure they exploited the natives and their land's resources, but how did they made things worse than they were? In reality the worse thing is exactly their out of control population growth which causes more poverty and misery there. And civil wars and tribal wars were already a thing there. That is how they got enslaved people to sell to Europeans. It's independence, African misrule of Africans, high birth rate and tribal wars that make Africa the way it is, not European colonialism. If European colonialism was bad too, they never knew any better rulers in their past or present. And some fools blame the pope for Africans not using birth control methods, which causes AIDS, stds and overpopulation too, as if one is to believe even nominally Catholic Africans are so devout to not use condoms but still have sex with whoever they can!lol And it is Ottomans that are to blame for Balkans and Romania being more backward together with communism later.

(1) Using that same line of thought, what were Romanians and South Slavs doing before the Ottomans? Most European inventions, which doubtless you like to piggy back on, were WESTERN European inventions, both before and after their Empires. (2) While I am aware of Dhimmitude, it was still not the same as the rigid racial hierarchies Europeans imposed on their colonies - Apartheid, Jim Crow, castas etc. (3) While I agree that most of Africa has always been underdeveloped (though even there, there were some major civilisations like the Ashanti and Ethiopians), certainly the way the British impoverished India is not disputed by most historians. Before the British arrival, Kolkata was as or more industrialised than many European cities, but the British forcibly shut down its industries in order to import cotton and make the products back in Britain before exporting them back to India again. Jared Diamond had it right in describing how Britain in particular, and the West in general, took over the world.

[Tooting Carmen]

I do not think that east asians have high IQs is new or contradictory to white supremacy white supremacists since always believed in east asian ability to copy but they do not invent like whites still even for the nazis honorary aryans

Even in Apartheid South Africa (though interestingly not Jim Crow US), East Asians were classified "honorary Whites".

[Straightman]

(1) Using that same line of thought, what were Romanians and South Slavs doing before the Ottomans? Most European inventions, which doubtless you like to piggy back on, were WESTERN European inventions, both before and after their Empires. (2) While I am aware of Dhimmitude, it was still not the same as the rigid racial hierarchies Europeans imposed on their colonies - Apartheid, Jim Crow, castas etc. (3) While I agree that most of Africa has always been underdeveloped (though even there, there were some major civilisations like the Ashanti and Ethiopians), certainly the way the British impoverished India is not disputed by most historians. Before the British arrival, Kolkata was as or more industrialised than many European cities, but the British forcibly shut down its industries in order to import cotton and make the products back in Britain before exporting them back to India again. Jared Diamond had it right in describing how Britain in particular, and the West in general, took over the world.

One city of Calcutta was rich and from that you come to the naive conclusion that all India was rich and developed! So the British ruined economically one town. Are you telling me many of them also pee and defecate on the streets because of the British? Balkans were on the same level as Western Europe in most medieval period. Only since early modern age that the West became wealthy and powerful, in large part because of colonial expansion to Americas and trade in the Far East. That coincided with Ottoman expansion in the East and was even provoked by it. And we didn't have cannibal tribes in the Balkans either...