0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 28 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4 Given: 6 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 28 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,918 Given: 11,760 |
I am Han Chinese
🔴
🔵
⚪
Target: Dušan_scaled
Distance: 1.7521% / 0.01752098
60.4 Slavic: RUS_Sunghir_MA
29.8 Roman: SRB_Svilos_Krusevlje
9.8 Byzantine: TUR_Marmara_Ilipinar_Byz2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,522 Given: 6,887 |
Bulgarians with being the source for church Slavonic and introducing a script for Slavic are even somewhat the head of the Slavic world.
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,918 Given: 11,760 |
They are not the head of the Slavic world. No other Slavs see Bulgarians in that way.
Just because they were geographically closest to Greeks and first got Cyrillic script (developed from Greek script) doesnt mean they are more civilized than Serbs, Russians, Ukrainians etc.
🔴
🔵
⚪
Target: Dušan_scaled
Distance: 1.7521% / 0.01752098
60.4 Slavic: RUS_Sunghir_MA
29.8 Roman: SRB_Svilos_Krusevlje
9.8 Byzantine: TUR_Marmara_Ilipinar_Byz2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 56 Given: 23 |
Yes
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,522 Given: 6,887 |
It's true that all that was just caused by their geographic position. I maybe expressed my self badly. I do not consider the Bulgarians the current head of the Slavic world, but in the historic-cultural development. This past - not current - position of the Bulgarians does connect them so much with the Slavic world that they must remain Slavic, no matter what.
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks