0
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,364 Given: 13,686 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,364 Given: 13,686 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,831 Given: 7,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,364 Given: 13,686 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 45,099 Given: 45,134 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,076 Given: 14,288 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,062 Given: 2,547 |
This seems to be an allusion to "Pascal's wager".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_wager
In short, it is better to believe in God if there is no God than not to believe in God if there is.
My main problem with this logic is it doesn't answer the question "Which God?"
"God" has a lot of baggage for a lot of people. This is why I keep what I believe close to my chest. When I'm called a "Heathen Scum", I shrug my shoulders and do nothing to correct them even if I know it is untrue.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks