Log in

View Full Version : White Americans non-caucasoid admixture from 23andme



Pages : 1 2 [3]

Longbowman
10-31-2014, 04:44 PM
We did have local laws and it was not socially acceptable. Blacks could not own property, work or be given full rights here. So basically we made it os they could not survive here at all so they moved north ward or west ward towards chicago. Before the civil war there were not many or any blacks here.

New Hampshire did. Massachusetts did. The rest didn't.

DanielJ1eH
10-31-2014, 05:33 PM
Yes! My mother is 50% Irish 25% North Sea German and 25% Finnish. My dad is mostly British [some Irish] and a small amount of French [Northern France around Brittany and Normandy]. :cool: I aint worried about nothing.....my dad did have some distant German Palatinate ancestry though but that was one ancestor.
I had one Albania member on here cuss me out since I have 0.1 Mena and minor AJ on conservative while he barely scored more European than me on the 23andme by a few percent but ended up getting 3. Something percent North Indian ancestry on the Ged matches tool and a L YDNA haplogroup. Needless to say I laughed pretty hard. Post the GED scores of White Americans and see what comes out.

LightHouse89
10-31-2014, 05:50 PM
New Hampshire did. Massachusetts did. The rest didn't.

New York did after the draft riots in the late 1800s. Maine and Vermont did not attract blacks because they were largely uninhabited [except some small towns which attracted rich wasps].

LightHouse89
10-31-2014, 05:51 PM
I had one Albania member on here cuss me out since I have 0.1 Mena and minor AJ on conservative while he barely scored more European than me on the 23andme by a few percent but ended up getting 3. Something percent North Indian ancestry on the Ged matches tool and a L YDNA haplogroup. Needless to say I laughed pretty hard. Post the GED scores of White Americans and see what comes out.

New Englanders I bet would score this 99% european [northern]...... with some % of North African or Southern European [as in west asian type dna].

Longbowman
10-31-2014, 05:53 PM
New York did after the draft riots in the late 1800s. Maine and Vermont did not attract blacks because they were largely uninhabited [except some small towns which attracted rich wasps].

New Jersey, Connecticut?

New York State passed no anti-miscegenation laws.

Smeagol
11-01-2014, 08:13 PM
It was only against the law from the late 1700s and early 1800s and not in all states. Most of New England plus NY and NJ never had laws against it.


Not True. Anti-Miscegenation laws began in the late 1600s in some of the 13 colonies and lasted until 1967 in the Southern States, and some other States.

Longbowman
11-01-2014, 08:55 PM
Not True. Anti-Miscegenation laws began in the late 1600s in some of the 13 colonies and lasted until 1967 in the Southern States, and some other States.

Yes, 1967 in the South, and Delaware.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/US_miscegenation.svg

Alaska, Hawaii, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire never had any.

Virginia first passed a law in 1691. Maryland had one in 1692.

LightHouse89
11-01-2014, 11:44 PM
New Jersey, Connecticut?

New York State passed no anti-miscegenation laws.

You are aware that state alone had some of the bloodiest race riots after and during the civil war. The irish and italians were behind most of them too. It had to do with the job competition in most cases in the factories. I do not know much about New Jersey history as it is not new england and I have never had interest for it..... connecticut was a very rich state and still is to this day....infact my dad's family lives there [well some do] and they are all wealthy......blacks would have not been able to survive there financially.....in the north the best way to drive the blacks away and it worked was to make it impossible for them to live here financially and this drew away most impoverished colored people. Chicago and out west was a different story though.....many went there for new land [free land in some cases and farms] or in the frontier cities which did not draw many people. Places like San Francisco, Chicago, California [overall] attracted millions of them.

Blacks before the 1970s did not live up this way and there are places in rural new england where blacks or latinos do not even live.....I mean there are very white towns up this way compared to most of the country. It is very expensive to live where I live. Boston for example is one of the highest taxed cities in the country. Most blacks here now came at the height of the race conflicts in the south......race riots down there were so bad the military had to be called in to shoot people. My dad and one of my uncles was in the national guard back then and he was stationed down south [where he worked for a brief period of time]....he recalled the blacks looting entire cities, and his entire unit being called in to put an end to civil unrest. That was in the late 60s.

The in the 1970s many came up this way [thanks to liberals] and the blacks started the same bullshit here. My uncle was a cop at the time here and served in the guard part time. Up this way we corralled blacks into projects because we did not know where else to put them because whites did want them in the same neighborhoods..... after a short time of them being here they began the riots all over. I have asked him about the race riots here they were not big as blacks were probably only 3% of the overall population of my state at the time. Luckily they still live in the same project housing and stay there.

LightHouse89
11-01-2014, 11:49 PM
Yes, 1967 in the South, and Delaware.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/US_miscegenation.svg

Alaska, Hawaii, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire never had any.

Virginia first passed a law in 1691. Maryland had one in 1692.

Yet Vermont never had many people living there up until the late 1800s.....and no jobs or work to be had for former slaves. They [slaves] moved to places that had potential work. New Hampshire and Maine hardly had many people living there too. There is no industry north of massachusetts by the way. New York and Massachusetts is where all of the industrial areas were. Vermont and New Hampshire were all farming communities and still are too this day. Rural upper new york is the same.....blacks mind you could not own land in most cases in the north east and they also did not possess the means to do so and could not vote here.

Infact I asked my parents out of curiosity if they ever went to school with black children or ever saw them....and they told me the only black population in the north east back then [pre-1960s] were centered in new york city. Today the bastards are everywhere in the cities.

LightHouse89
11-01-2014, 11:52 PM
Not True. Anti-Miscegenation laws began in the late 1600s in some of the 13 colonies and lasted until 1967 in the Southern States, and some other States.

Yes and No. In most states blacks could not own land, vote or own much of any property. So this would have driven them away alone......but mind you it was unacceptable within the communities where I lived for blacks and whites to mix. This is well known.....my grandmother use to tell me to never hang around blacks....and if I married one she would come back from the dead and haunt me forever LOL. People do not realize the north east may have been anti slavery but certainly not pro race mixing either.

Longbowman
11-01-2014, 11:55 PM
Yet Vermont never had many people living there up until the late 1800s.....and no jobs or work to be had for former slaves. They [slaves] moved to places that had potential work. New Hampshire and Maine hardly had many people living there too. There is no industry north of massachusetts by the way. New York and Massachusetts is where all of the industrial areas were. Vermont and New Hampshire were all farming communities and still are too this day. Rural upper new york is the same.....blacks mind you could not own land in most cases in the north east and they also did not possess the means to do so and could not vote here.

Infact I asked my parents out of curiosity if they ever went to school with black children or ever saw them....and they told me the only black population in the north east back then [pre-1960s] were centered in new york city. Today the bastards are everywhere in the cities.

I'm aware that the North is sparsely populated, but NY and NJ were hardly unpopulated.

LightHouse89
11-01-2014, 11:57 PM
I'm aware that the North is sparsely populated, but NY and NJ were hardly unpopulated.

You do realize both states had huge race riots throughout the late 1800s and up through the 1960s...... but yes they had small areas with blacks. New York probably being the area they settled. They worked in factories mostly until recently....now they like welfare more than work.

I have been throughout northern new england and northern new york. It is very colonial in terms of the people who live there except some Irish catholics who migrated to these places and some Poles.....mostly because they were farmers in the old countries and had money to buy farms here. Or like my father's ancestors they were ship carpenters in northern new york.

Longbowman
11-01-2014, 11:59 PM
You do realize both states had huge race riots throughout the late 1800s and up through the 1960s...... but yes they had small areas with blacks. New York probably being the area they settled. They worked in factories mostly until recently....now they like welfare more than work.

I have been throughout northern new england and northern new york. It is very colonial in terms of the people who live there except some Irish catholics who migrated to these places and some Poles.....mostly because they were farmers in the old countries and had money to buy farms here. Or like my father's ancestors they were ship carpenters in northern new york.

Northern New York is empty but the point is that for centuries no one stopped mixing happening in NYC, where there have always been many blacks (just a for-instance).

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:14 AM
Northern New York is empty but the point is that for centuries no one stopped mixing happening in NYC, where there have always been many blacks (just a for-instance).

who would have they mixed with? :rolleyes: :picard1: the point is you along with many people here really do not know pre 1960s America. Or what society was like despite 'laws'.....the fact is there ws far more mixing down south than up north.......the saying 'once you go black' has an older meaning.....once you went that route you were shunned by the community. Why do you think blacks still live in black communities? even today? inter-racialism is still not popular here. Not to mention in the cities you still have racial issues all of the time.

The Irish, Italians and Poles have always been very ruthless to the blacks....even today they still are hahah. I have Italian and Irish friends and they are well known for hating the blacks and the blacks dislike them as well.

In europe it is probably different as blacks were imported there and mixing with them was never seen as bad. Here it is different. Mixing with them is equal to mixing with a slave people which is socially unacceptable to most people or families. If you mix with them be prepared to lose your family for good. My mothers parents which were mostly irish with some other northern ancestry for example were very anti black.....my dad's family from rural new york and vermont were the same.

The reason new york city may have been friendly to the blacks is due to the fact they needed them to put to work in factories so this is why they were very liberal with the laws regarding them.

I read somewhere that the blacks once Britain passed laws abolishing slavery allowed blacks to inter marry with Brits [which they did but it probably was not very common either].....the same in France, Germany and most of europe that had slaves. However europe did not import as many slaves as did the colonies but in the colonies inter-racial marriage was never acceptable to 99% of the people.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:17 AM
who would have they mixed with? :rolleyes: :picard1: the point is you along with many people here really do not know pre 1960s America. Or what society was like despite 'laws'.....the fact is there ws far more mixing down south than up north.......the saying 'once you go black' has an older meaning.....once you went that route you were shunned by the community. Why do you think blacks still live in black communities? even today? inter-racialism is still not popular here. Not to mention in the cities you still have racial issues all of the time.

The Irish, Italians and Poles have always been very ruthless to the blacks....even today they still are hahah. I have Italian and Irish friends and they are well known for hating the blacks and the blacks dislike them as well.

In europe it is probably different as blacks were imported there and mixing with them was never seen as bad. Here it is different. Mixing with them is equal to mixing with a slave people which is socially unacceptable to most people or families. If you mix with them be prepared to lose your family for good. My mothers parents which were mostly irish with some other northern ancestry for example were very anti black.....my dad's family from rural new york and vermont were the same.

The reason new york city may have been friendly to the blacks is due to the fact they needed them to put to work in factories so this is why they were very liberal with the laws regarding them.

I read somewhere that the blacks once Britain passed laws abolishing slavery allowed blacks to inter marry with Brits [which they did but it probably was not very common either].....the same in France, Germany and most of europe that had slaves. However europe did not import as many slaves as did the colonies but in the colonies inter-racial marriage was never acceptable to 99% of the people.

You don't know it either. But they mixed. Obama's mother is descended from some black dude from the 1750s.

Britain never had anti-miscegenation laws, because we are superior to you, and also because very few slaves were taken to the UK.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:23 AM
You don't know it either. But they mixed. Obama's mother is descended from some black dude from the 1750s.

Britain never had anti-miscegenation laws, because we are superior to you, and also because very few slaves were taken to the UK.

Brits today are liberal and they have always been liberal....superior? :rolleyes:

I do know it because I know my people more than someone from across the Atlantic. Obama's mother is a whore from the 1960s who converted to islam....she also came from Kansas.......http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Dunham

Historically many people from there were anti slavery and wanted to settle slaves there....they had 'jungle bunny' fever LOL XD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas#History

Anyway he comes from a Quadroon family with Slave DNA XD LOL hahahaha.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:27 AM
furthermore it was common that blacks were accepted in post slavery england and encouraged to stay and inter marry [this explains why I have so far in life met 4 british white women married to black niggers from the south here LOL XD] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_British_Isles#Enslaved_Africans

Former slaves in England were encouraged to stay so long as it was their own free will. They also could own property, enter politics, etc....... Wow......how superior :rolleyes:

http://www.blackpresence.co.uk/category/black-history/black-britain/

LOL England stronk! XD hahahahahahaha

Tooting Carmen
11-02-2014, 12:28 AM
You don't know it either. But they mixed. Obama's mother is descended from some black dude from the 1750s.

Britain never had anti-miscegenation laws, because we are superior to you, and also because very few slaves were taken to the UK.

I think the latter counts much more than the former as the explanation. After all, before Windrush the Black population in Britain, especially outside London, was scant. Where do you think the uber-racist White Americans mostly came from originally, Longbowman?

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:28 AM
Britain is always superior, whether its fascist or communist.

Yes yes, I know, nigger this, nigger that, Obama is a Kenyan Muslim, USA number 1. Now go and have a cheeseburger and shoot up a school or something.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:29 AM
I think the latter counts much more than the former as the explanation. After all, before Windrush the Black population in Britain, especially outside London, was scant. Where do you think the uber-racist White Americans mostly came from originally, Longbowman?

Actually London had a black population of 20,000 in the 1800s and when the colony of Sierra Leone was set up in the early 1800s white girlfriends of British blacks were encouraged to accompany their pioneer husbands.

DanielJ1eH
11-02-2014, 12:30 AM
Britain is always superior, whether its fascist or communist.

Yes yes, I know, nigger this, nigger that, Obama is a Kenyan Muslim, USA number 1. Now go and have a cheeseburger and shoot up a school or something.

He is.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:31 AM
He is.

He is in fairness half-Kenyan but I was referring to the Kenyan-by-citizenship rumour that idiots like to spread. And no, he's not a Muslim. And I voted for Romney, young padawan.

Tooting Carmen
11-02-2014, 12:32 AM
Actually London had a black population of 20,000 in the 1800s and when the colony of Sierra Leone was set up in the early 1800s white girlfriends of British blacks were encouraged to accompany their pioneer husbands.

I did say especially outside London. Besides, even taking into account population differences between then and now, 20,000 Blacks was still a small number - there are over 1,000,000 in London nowadays (or circa 13% of the city's population), plus a mixed-race population of 405,000 (or circa 5% of the city's population). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_London

Smeagol
11-02-2014, 12:33 AM
Yes, 1967 in the South, and Delaware.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/US_miscegenation.svg

Alaska, Hawaii, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire never had any.

Virginia first passed a law in 1691. Maryland had one in 1692.

Yeah, but most other states had the laws after the Civil War still, not only until the early 1800s.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:34 AM
Britain is always superior, whether its fascist or communist.

Yes yes, I know, nigger this, nigger that, Obama is a Kenyan Muslim, USA number 1. Now go and have a cheeseburger and shoot up a school or something.

Obama is a Muslim or atheist who knows but he isnt an American and this is well known. But then again what does American mean anymore? Since the annexation of puerto rico the term american is meaningless to me....those brown savages are not my equal.

Superior? Please my friend do not make a fool of yourself with such a statement. America is the one thing protecting Jolly Good England right now from the Eurasian Empire.

Shoot up a school? why would I massacre innocent white children? or anyone for that matter? do not be insane.....this alone is why you shall not have rights to own a fire arm here or use one.

Ah! Cheeseburger? Mmmmh sounds good....But nay! Not just any cheeseburger.....an Angus Burger with American white cheese, bacon, mustard, bulky rolls... some ketchup, salad and a tomato....now that is a Burger.

Britain is no longer anything to be taken seriously in the world. It use to be called 'Great' but it isnt so 'Great' anymore. Britain is water under a bridge today in world politics.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:34 AM
I did say especially outside London. Besides, even taking into account population differences between then and now, 20,000 Blacks was still a small number - there are over 780,000 in London nowadays (or circa 11% of the city's population), plus a mixed-race population of 226,000 (or circa 3% of the city's population).

London makes the policy, Kylie. You know that and that's always been how it is. Yes, but the population is now 8.3 million, it was less than a million back then, don't be silly. They were a very visible presence, especially in certain parts of the city.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:34 AM
He is in fairness half-Kenyan but I was referring to the Kenyan-by-citizenship rumour that idiots like to spread. And no, he's not a Muslim. And I voted for Romney, young padawan.

Because he is......a Kenyan....his mother is a whore either way to most of us.

DanielJ1eH
11-02-2014, 12:35 AM
He is in fairness half-Kenyan but I was referring to the Kenyan-by-citizenship rumour that idiots like to spread. And no, he's not a Muslim. And I voted for Romney, young padawan.

http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/08/20/3473864/congressman-claims-obamas-isil-policy-is-guided-by-muslim-brothers/

His mother is a mudshark. She ruined her Northwestern European genetics. End of that line.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:35 AM
Yeah, but most other states had the laws after the Civil War still, not only until the early 1800s.

All the states in green removed those laws from the books by 1887.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:35 AM
Because he is......a Kenyan....his mother is a whore either way to most of us.

Except the majority of you who voted for him, I suppose.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:36 AM
Actually London had a black population of 20,000 in the 1800s and when the colony of Sierra Leone was set up in the early 1800s white girlfriends of British blacks were encouraged to accompany their pioneer husbands.

No they werent they were encouraged to stay in England had they had the choice to....why would they go to some backwater Sierra Leone? They can bang all those white british wimenz by staying LOL.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:36 AM
Except the majority of you who voted for him, I suppose.

Ever here of voter fraud? it is very real here.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:36 AM
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/08/20/3473864/congressman-claims-obamas-isil-policy-is-guided-by-muslim-brothers/

His mother is a mudshark. She ruined her Northwestern European genetics. End of that line.

Yes, idiots just like him.

Obama's approved drone strikes on ISIS. Ron Paul supports stopping that. Is Ron Paul a Muslim?

His mother was already part black.

Tooting Carmen
11-02-2014, 12:36 AM
London makes the policy, Kylie. You know that and that's always been how it is. Yes, but the population is now 8.3 million, it was less than a million back then, don't be silly. They were a very visible presence, especially in certain parts of the city.

The scale of ethnic diversity between the UK of 1814 and the UK of 2014 is on a wholly different scale and it is really facetious and silly to argue otherwise. Btw, I edited the post before with the 2011 Census figures.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:37 AM
He is.

yes! we all know it but it is racist to ever say he is not an American LOL.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:37 AM
Ever here of voter fraud? it is very real here.

Yes, I heard about Florida in 2000. I suppose that's part of what makes you superior. Teach us your ways so we might also have the highest murder rate in the Western world.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:38 AM
No they werent they were encouraged to stay in England had they had the choice to....why would they go to some backwater Sierra Leone? They can bang all those white british wimenz by staying LOL.

Jim, whilst I remain impressed as always by your knowledge of history, you're wrong just this one time.

Tooting Carmen
11-02-2014, 12:38 AM
Yes, I heard about Florida in 2000. I suppose that's part of what makes you superior. Teach us your ways so we might also have the highest murder rate in the Western world.

Aren't you a joint UK-US citizen yourself?

Also
11-02-2014, 12:38 AM
Both of obama's parents are non-white, she is not a white mudshark.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:39 AM
Yes, I heard about Florida in 2000. I suppose that's part of what makes you superior. Teach us your ways so we might also have the highest murder rate in the Western world.

Florida has a large black and brown population....what do you expect....any state filled with those subhumans is going to have high murder/gun crime rates. Duhhhhh!

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:40 AM
Jim, whilst I remain impressed as always by your knowledge of history, you're wrong just this one time.

But this is what Wikipedia and that black british history site. France, Germany and Italy were the same........LOL.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:40 AM
Obama is a Muslim or atheist who knows but he isnt an American and this is well known. But then again what does American mean anymore? Since the annexation of puerto rico the term american is meaningless to me....those brown savages are not my equal.

Superior? Please my friend do not make a fool of yourself with such a statement. America is the one thing protecting Jolly Good England right now from the Eurasian Empire.

Shoot up a school? why would I massacre innocent white children? or anyone for that matter? do not be insane.....this alone is why you shall not have rights to own a fire arm here or use one.

Ah! Cheeseburger? Mmmmh sounds good....But nay! Not just any cheeseburger.....an Angus Burger with American white cheese, bacon, mustard, bulky rolls... some ketchup, salad and a tomato....now that is a Burger.

Britain is no longer anything to be taken seriously in the world. It use to be called 'Great' but it isnt so 'Great' anymore. Britain is water under a bridge today in world politics.

Puerto Rico hasn't been annexed to America. It is a territory of America. It has been that was since 1899. Is that your date for America being terrible? Obama isn't a Muslim. If he is, he's the worst Muslim ever, as he happily eats pork, goes to Church a lot, is close friends with his pastor, married a Christian, and never does anything Muslim. He isn't an atheist either, not that being either is un-American, as America is a secular nation although perhaps the concept of separation of Church and state hasn't hit Massachusetts yet.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:41 AM
Aren't you a joint UK-US citizen yourself?

Yes, I referred to having voted in 2012 like 15 minutes ago.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:42 AM
Puerto Rico hasn't been annexed to America. It is a territory of America. It has been that was since 1899. Is that your date for America being terrible? Obama isn't a Muslim. If he is, he's the worst Muslim ever, as he happily eats pork, goes to Church a lot, is close friends with his pastor, married a Christian, and never does anything Muslim. He isn't an atheist either, not that being either is un-American, as America is a secular nation although perhaps the concept of separation of Church and state hasn't hit Massachusetts yet.

'One nation under God'........you tell me.

Anyway he goes to some Nigger worship place not a real church. Blacks do not go to heaven do not be absurd LOL. 1899? Yes! America died on the fields of Gettysburg which is a common saying for people like me :cool:

Tooting Carmen
11-02-2014, 12:42 AM
Florida has a large black and brown population....what do you expect....any state filled with those subhumans is going to have high murder/gun crime rates. Duhhhhh!

You are mixing things up. He means the voter fraud scandal in Florida in 2000 where Dubya dubiously won that State. As for the murder rate, isn't Washington DC the worst for it?

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:44 AM
You are mixing things up. He means the voter fraud scandal in Florida in 2000 where Dubya dubiously won that State. As for the murder rate, isn't Washington DC the worst for it?

Most if not all major cities have violent crime thanks to Puerto Ricans, Caribbean peoples and Blacks. The three worst races to ever be brought here. A total waste of our tax dollars going to educate these primates :picard1:.

Anyway by voter fraud I was referring to the recent and last election of Osama Hussein Obama.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:44 AM
'One nation under God'........you tell me.

Anyway he goes to some Nigger worship place not a real church. Blacks do not go to heaven do not be absurd LOL. 1899? Yes! America died on the fields of Gettysburg which is a common saying for people like me :cool:

Jim, please read the US Constitution. America is a secular nation. 'In God we Trust' was added to your currency in the 1950s.

Yes, niggers don't have souls. Does he at least have half a soul, then? Anyhow, if he doesn't have a soul, he can't be Muslim, so you lose.

Smeagol
11-02-2014, 12:46 AM
http://www.blackpresence.co.uk/category/black-history/black-britain/

LOL England stronk! XD hahahahahahaha

This website is pathetic. Trying to say that White English kids should be taught about the "accomplishments of great black Britons". Well there is no such thing as a black Briton, and African niggers living in Britain have never contributed anything. All of them are just parasites.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:46 AM
Jim, please read the US Constitution. America is a secular nation. 'In God we Trust' was added to your currency in the 1950s.

Yes, niggers don't have souls. Does he at least have half a soul, then? Anyhow, if he doesn't have a soul, he can't be Muslim, so you lose.

No because you admitted he had other black admixture....so no he doesnt have a chance of entering heaven. Anyway this is the church he goes to. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAYe7MT5BxM

What did I lose? Nothing :p

The 1950s was a good period here. We had segregation and low crime rates.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:48 AM
This website is pathetic. Trying to say that White English kids should be taught about the "accomplishments of great black Britons". Well there is no such thing as a black Briton, and African niggers living in Britain have never contributed anything. All of them are just parasites.

I know but europeans like to lecture to us on our history when we learned int from our grandparents....it gets silly so I use these websites to troll them back.

Smeagol
11-02-2014, 12:49 AM
All the states in green removed those laws from the books by 1887.

I know, that doesn't contradict what I said at all.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:49 AM
No because you admitted he had other black admixture....so no he doesnt have a chance of entering heaven. Anyway this is the church he goes to. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAYe7MT5BxM

What did I lose? Nothing :p

The 1950s was a good period here. We had segregation and low crime rates.

Regardless your country is legally and officially secular. Please read the constitution.

I'm not watching the video, but the point is: if he has a soul, he's Christian. If he doesn't have a soul, he can't be Muslim. Checkmate.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:51 AM
Regardless your country is legally and officially secular. Please read the constitution.

I'm not watching the video, but the point is: if he has a soul, he's Christian. If he doesn't have a soul, he can't be Muslim. Checkmate.

Why not watch the video. It is 3 minutes long and very funny. It proves my point. Anyway :rolleyes:

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:52 AM
I know, that doesn't contradict what I said at all.

Was just adding. Wasn't trying to contradict.

Oneeye
11-02-2014, 12:56 AM
Jim, please read the US Constitution. America is a secular nation. 'In God we Trust' was added to your currency in the 1950s.

Yes, niggers don't have souls. Does he at least have half a soul, then? Anyhow, if he doesn't have a soul, he can't be Muslim, so you lose.


Had to out them commies somehow.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 12:57 AM
Had to out them commies somehow.

True. A communist would never use anything with the word God on it.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 12:59 AM
Had to out them commies somehow.

Well the commies are back and in full swing. White student Union [7 people] vs the Red Horde here on the east coast.

Commie bastards! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JX_zKklqGs

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 01:01 AM
True. A communist would never use anything with the word God on it.

In my area they protest outside of churches and make all sorts of threats which the authorities let them get away with. Hmmmmm maybe we need to reform the Klan to do with these mixed race red subhumans LOL. Irishers like myself will be pivotal to such a cause.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 01:02 AM
In my area they protest outside of churches and make all sorts of threats which the authorities let them get away with. Hmmmmm maybe we need to reform the Klan to do with these mixed race red subhumans LOL. Irishers like myself will be pivotal to such a cause.

You switch between being Irish and not being Irish just about every fortnight.

Also
11-02-2014, 01:05 AM
You switch between being Irish and not being Irish just about every fortnight.

Mixed people struggle with their identity.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 01:12 AM
You switch between being Irish and not being Irish just about every fortnight.

I am Anglo-Irish. My ancestry is mixed from Ireland and UK......Many people in New England are this way....I grew up though believing I was 100% Irish XD.......because this is what my family told me and my surname is from Ireland so I accepted it at face value until I looked at family records. But I can claim I am Irish because I have Ulster ancestry and Southern Irish...... yes I have been critical on Uslter folks.....I feel bad I like Novella she is sweet so I had to stop.....but here shockingly Ulster folks in the south got along with Irish catholics [infact they fought side by side against us Yanks from the north].

I am still about over 60% British/Irish [my British side is mixed though-from Ulster, Lowlands of Scotland and East Anglia....rather an odd combination]. Most of my Irish catholic ancestry is from only the South...... judging by records and surnames [Gaellic and non Gaellic]. Take my mother's surname, O'Sullivan...it is from the South of Ireland and my surname Power is from Watersford which is also in the South. I suppose though I am Anglo-Celt mostly but have a fetish for Germany LOL.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 01:13 AM
Mixed people struggle with their identity.

:rolleyes: mixed in which way? assclown from race mixed land. over 60% of my ancestry comes from the British Islands.

Also
11-02-2014, 01:19 AM
:rolleyes: mixed in which way?

You're a mix of different ethnicities, in that way. Look at your own post explaining your search for your ancestry, how you were confused about your own ancestry and who you are and how you have ambiguous and volatile feelings towards the irish people. It's all a bit confusing.


assclown from race mixed land. over 60% of my ancestry comes from the British Islands.

Lol, I don't dispute that. Not everyone has the joy in living in an all-white land, right?

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 01:34 AM
You're a mix of different ethnicities, in that way. Look at your own post explaining your search for your ancestry, how you were confused about your own ancestry and who you are and how you have ambiguous and volatile feelings towards the irish people. It's all a bit confusing.



Lol, I don't dispute that. Not everyone has the joy in living in an all-white land, right?

No I am first and fore most a New Englander. Am I not allowed to talk about my ancestry? Identity crisis? LOL my identity is where I am from....do you see Southerners with identity crises? No!

Leto
11-02-2014, 11:32 AM
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/08/20/3473864/congressman-claims-obamas-isil-policy-is-guided-by-muslim-brothers/

His mother is a mudshark. She ruined her Northwestern European genetics. End of that line.
He should have married a white woman. 25 percent black is better than 75 (his daughters).:cool:

Leto
11-02-2014, 11:34 AM
His mother was already part black.
It hasn't been confirmed.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 11:36 AM
It hasn't been confirmed.

Like, 1 ancestor from the 1700s.

Leto
11-02-2014, 11:36 AM
'One nation under God'........you tell me.

One nation under Allah (or Satan) with no liberty and justice for anybody.:rolleyes:

Leto
11-02-2014, 11:37 AM
Like, 1 ancestor from the 1700s.
And do you think she is black?:)

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 11:38 AM
And do you think she is black?:)

One drop rule.

No, of course not.

Leto
11-02-2014, 11:39 AM
every fortnight.
This word is not known or used in the US, as far as I know. Two weeks.

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 11:40 AM
This word is not known or used in the US, as far as I know. Two weeks.

I won't alter my vocabulary for American comfort.

Leto
11-02-2014, 11:41 AM
I won't alter my vocabulary for American comfort.
Typical English arrogance and chauvinism.:)

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 11:42 AM
Typical English arrogance and chauvinism.:)

I'm half American.

Leto
11-02-2014, 11:44 AM
I'm half American.
Well, I'm joking. But your English must be British, right?

Longbowman
11-02-2014, 11:46 AM
Well, I'm joking. But your English must be British, right?

Oh yes, culturally I am 100% British having been raised here. But I still blame all my bad habits on the American side.

Oneeye
11-02-2014, 07:01 PM
This word is not known or used in the US, as far as I know. Two weeks.

I've heard the term before, but have to admit that it is not commonly used. I'm going to make an effort to use it now. :D

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 07:03 PM
I've heard the term before, but have to admit that it is not commonly used. I'm going to make an effort to use it now. :D

Liberals who attack racialists like myself always use it....so I use it and it is commonly used here in race relation conversations. Most people with black ancestry always think black in america....they sympathize with the blacks in every race issue to so to me they are black.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 07:04 PM
One nation under Allah (or Satan) with no liberty and justice for anybody.:rolleyes:

Yes today thanks to Liberals, Libertarians and Socialists.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 07:05 PM
One drop rule.

No, of course not.

She married a Nigger so she is one of them as far as I am concerned.

Leto
11-02-2014, 07:05 PM
I've heard the term before, but have to admit that it is not commonly used. I'm going to make an effort to use it now. :D
That's a good idea.:thumb001: I think the minor vocabulary differences between two varieties of English should be leveled. Start using "queue" instead of "line", "motorway" instead of "highway", etc. The British know American words, because they watch your movies, shows, listen to your music, read your books, etc.

Leto
11-02-2014, 07:07 PM
Liberals who attack racialists like myself always use it....so I use it and it is commonly used here in race relation conversations. Most people with black ancestry always think black in america....they sympathize with the blacks in every race issue to so to me they are black.
What?? I guess you've misunderstood that message. It has nothing to do with race, nor with politics.

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 07:08 PM
That's a good idea.:thumb001: I think the minor vocabulary differences between two varieties of English should be leveled. Start using "queue" instead of "line", "motorway" instead of "highway", etc. The British know American words, because they watch your movies, shows, listen to your music, read your books, etc.

I like highway and the word line.......why should we be more like the British? Our ancestors came here to be different because as you old worlders say 'Americans are exceptional' :cool::p

Leto
11-02-2014, 07:10 PM
I like highway and the word line.......why should we be more like the British? Our ancestors came here to be different because as you old worlders say 'Americans are exceptional' :cool::p
Not like the British. Actually I aways prefer American English. I mean let's level the lexical differences.

Oneeye
11-02-2014, 07:10 PM
Liberals who attack racialists like myself always use it....so I use it and it is commonly used here in race relation conversations. Most people with black ancestry always think black in america....they sympathize with the blacks in every race issue to so to me they are black.

Funny, I'd expect it to be used more talking about work, as in, "I'm paid every fortnight." How do they use it? xD

Leto
11-02-2014, 07:11 PM
Funny, I'd expect it to be used more talking about work, as in, "I'm paid every fortnight." How do they use it? xD
Jim didn't get the point.

Oneeye
11-02-2014, 07:14 PM
That's a good idea.:thumb001: I think the minor vocabulary differences between two varieties of English should be leveled. Start using "queue" instead of "line", "motorway" instead of "highway", etc. The British know American words, because they watch your movies, shows, listen to your music, read your books, etc.

I just prefer having a simpler, Germanic derived vocabulary rather than Latin. Get enough of that working in the medical field. Fortnight instead of "bi-weekly."

LightHouse89
11-02-2014, 07:27 PM
Funny, I'd expect it to be used more talking about work, as in, "I'm paid every fortnight." How do they use it? xD

Like in history class at my college......people who were legally black did not have the right to vote [thank God!].......left wing people who accuse the already liberal establish meant here [some of which probably do have a black ancestor] always use it to define themselves as a minority. It is very real here that people with one drop of negrid use it to form their world view of anti-white...at least here this is what socialists and ultra-left liberals do.

I consider them black too. If you think and act black around blacks you are one of them.....a monkey to me.

At my college the socialist and ultral liberal student unions use it.......I belong to the Republican Student Union because there is no white student union. I am somewhat political so I hear this stuff but I should clarify that it is not entirely commonly used or talked about outside of political/cultural circles.

Like I never hear about 'one drop rule' at work or when I am grocery shopping LOL.

TheForeigner
11-03-2014, 09:05 AM
http://dienekes.blogspot.it/2014/09/...different.html You guys should also check out this other study that seems to reveal higher admixture level and in more americans. I personally am begining to doubt the sincerity and value of some of these studies though. They sure change their tune often and fast. Either they make mistakes or they have some political and racial agenda.

Oneeye
11-03-2014, 02:12 PM
http://dienekes.blogspot.it/2014/09/...different.html You guys should also check out this other study that seems to reveal higher admixture level and in more americans. I personally am begining to doubt the sincerity and value of some of these studies though. They sure change their tune often and fast. Either they make mistakes or they have some political and racial agenda.

Deadlink

Oneeye
11-03-2014, 02:15 PM
http://dienekes.blogspot.it/2014/09/23andme-mega-study-on-different.html


Do you mean this one? It shows damned near jack squat for white American non-caucasoid admixture. I wish they showed a map for the French/German % by state. Feels like it is missing a big component.


I like how I have the appropriate amount of British Isle for my state... though I have much Higher Scandinavian. I'm like the average Minnesotan going by that.

TheForeigner
11-03-2014, 02:19 PM
http://dienekes.blogspot.it/2014/09/23andme-mega-study-on-different.html


Do you mean this one? It shows damned near jack squat for white American non-caucasoid admixture. I wish they showed a map for the French/German % by state. Feels like it is missing a big component.


I like how I have the apporpiate amount of British Isle for my state... though I have much Higher Scandinavian.

Actually it does give you some stats and a graph too.

Oneeye
11-03-2014, 02:20 PM
Actually it does give you some stats and a graph too.


Overall, it seems that relatively few (less than 5%) of European Americans have more than 2% either African or Native American ancestry in any of the states, so the breakdown of European ancestry into various subgroups is perhaps more interesting.


As I said... there is damned near jack squat for white American admixture. You seem to be misunderstanding.

TheForeigner
11-03-2014, 02:21 PM
http://dienekes.blogspot.it/2014/09/23andme-mega-study-on-different.html


Do you mean this one? It shows damned near jack squat for white American non-caucasoid admixture. I wish they showed a map for the French/German % by state. Feels like it is missing a big component.


I like how I have the appropriate amount of British Isle for my state... though I have much Higher Scandinavian. I'm like the average Minnesotan going by that.

Don't know about these tests that supposedly tell you accurate ethnic origins. Maybe just genetic components typical or peaking in certain ethnicities. Shouldn't try and find out your roots just by DNA tests.

TheForeigner
11-03-2014, 02:22 PM
As I said... there is damned near jack squat for white American admixture. You seem to be misunderstanding.

Well 5% with more than 2% is something and surprising. It's more than previous results and says there are a few who seem mixed race and confused.

Oneeye
11-03-2014, 02:47 PM
Don't know about these tests that supposedly tell you accurate ethnic origins. Maybe just genetic components typical or peaking in certain ethnicities. Shouldn't try and find out your roots just by DNA tests.

What? You don't know anything about these tests? Many of the customers, like myself, are into genealogy and share together when we have matching segments to better complete our family trees. I already know a lot about my roots, tyvm, and I'm interested in finding out more...



Well 5% with more than 2% is something and surprising. It's more than previous results and says there are a few who seem mixed race and confused.

It is under 5%... So 4% of white Americans have 2% or higher African segments... Someone who scores 2% African is in at least the 96th percentile of African admixture for white Americans. xD Notice with the maps that most states have about 2% in coloring with Louisiana and Georgia being much higher... so admixed white Americans are concentrated, in places where it is to be expected. Similarly with Native Ancestry... it is concentrated.


This is much lower admixture than other colonials. Nothing "high" about it.

Oneeye
11-03-2014, 02:59 PM
This graph, which only shows the whites with over 2% African, shows that most of them, (around 75%) have 6% or under.



http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xEXYm1tupEU/VBs-feRAFtI/AAAAAAAAJzM/YyHvUap-jLM/s1600/distribution.jpg

TheForeigner
11-03-2014, 03:13 PM
This graph, which only shows the whites with over 2% African, shows that most of them, (around 75%) have 6% or under.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xEXYm1tupEU/VBs-feRAFtI/AAAAAAAAJzM/YyHvUap-jLM/s1600/distribution.jpg

I'd say those 25% at least are not really white. I wonder what is the story of some.

LightHouse89
11-03-2014, 05:05 PM
http://dienekes.blogspot.it/2014/09/23andme-mega-study-on-different.html


Do you mean this one? It shows damned near jack squat for white American non-caucasoid admixture. I wish they showed a map for the French/German % by state. Feels like it is missing a big component.


I like how I have the appropriate amount of British Isle for my state... though I have much Higher Scandinavian. I'm like the average Minnesotan going by that.

french american......http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_American#mediaviewer/File:French1346.gif [consensus records]

german americans http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_American#mediaviewer/File:German1346.gif

Oneeye
11-03-2014, 05:25 PM
french american......http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_American#mediaviewer/File:French1346.gif [consensus records]

german americans http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_American#mediaviewer/File:German1346.gif


Jim, I was wanting 23andme's demographics to compare to those. :D

LightHouse89
11-03-2014, 05:25 PM
Jim, I was wanting 23andme's demographics to compare to those. :D

next week I will try to order it or the week after? not sure.

Oneeye
11-03-2014, 05:40 PM
next week I will try to order it or the week after? not sure.

I found what I was looking for. :D I'll post a new thread showing white American 23andme Ancestry Composition averages by state this evening. Maybe throw in other races' as well. :D

LightHouse89
11-03-2014, 07:40 PM
I found what I was looking for. :D I'll post a new thread showing white American 23andme Ancestry Composition averages by state this evening. Maybe throw in other races' as well. :D

please do. What does new england look like? :cool:

Oneeye
11-05-2014, 03:15 AM
Jim, go to this website:

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2014/09/18/009340

click on "Data supplements"

then click on "supplemental tables and figures"

go to the 12th page (shown as page 50)

I'm at my state's average for all except I don't have any "East European" and I have a much higher "Scandinavian"

DanielJ1eH
11-05-2014, 03:22 AM
This shouldn't really be a thread. North American Whites/Jews/etc whatever are all very homogenous.

With the exception of slavery most races self-segregate. I think the results make that fairly clear.

Aviator
11-05-2014, 03:23 AM
Actually London had a black population of 20,000 in the 1800s and when the colony of Sierra Leone was set up in the early 1800s white girlfriends of British blacks were encouraged to accompany their pioneer husbands.

As much as I admire Britain's past, that place's outlook and general culture always have been a little creepy on a psychological level.

LightHouse89
11-05-2014, 02:00 PM
the brits are fruit loops.

LightHouse89
11-05-2014, 03:31 PM
Jim, go to this website:

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2014/09/18/009340

click on "Data supplements"

then click on "supplemental tables and figures"

go to the 12th page (shown as page 50)

I'm at my state's average for all except I don't have any "East European" and I have a much higher "Scandinavian"

under data supplements I cannot find that link or "supplemental tables and figures".

Petalpusher
11-05-2014, 04:08 PM
under data supplements I cannot find that link or "supplemental tables and figures".

http://s18.postimg.org/7sgaummkp/amfa.png

Longbowman
11-05-2014, 04:14 PM
the brits are fruit loops.

I love fruit loops.

LightHouse89
11-05-2014, 04:23 PM
I love fruit loops.

I like lucky charms.

Longbowman
11-05-2014, 04:24 PM
I like lucky charms.

Heretic.

LightHouse89
11-05-2014, 04:24 PM
http://s18.postimg.org/7sgaummkp/amfa.png

when i click on the link 'data supplements'..this doesnt pop up? Also is there anyway of making it bigger?

LightHouse89
11-05-2014, 04:24 PM
Heretic.

fruity pebbles too LOL

LightHouse89
11-05-2014, 04:26 PM
never mind I found it....I must have went to the wrong location or something hahaha.

Well those population maps of where people are or what ancestry they specifically report is pretty much the truth for New England and New York [rurally and city]...... I mean here it is obvious....most people have French [some German but not many] and British/Irish surnames and actually could easily pass in the British Islands or France.

Oneeye
11-08-2014, 07:04 PM
http://s18.postimg.org/7sgaummkp/amfa.png

I think these maps shows the particularly British Isle and German composition of the majority of white Americans very well, but I do wonder what the average "broadly Northern European" scores are. I think that much of the German ancestry of Americans is under that umbrella.

I noticed that the lowest the B&I average is 25%, and the lowest F&G is 8%... nationwide averages are what, around 40% and 12% respectively?

Again, I score like a Minnesotan or North Dakotan even for Scandinavian, but everything else is right around average for my region (Pacific NW)

LightHouse89
11-09-2014, 02:13 AM
I think these maps shows the particularly British Isle and German composition of the majority of white Americans very well, but I do wonder what the average "broadly Northern European" scores are. I think that much of the German ancestry of Americans is under that umbrella.

I noticed that the lowest the B&I average is 25%, and the lowest F&G is 8%... nationwide averages are what, around 40% and 12% respectively?

Again, I score like a Minnesotan or North Dakotan even for Scandinavian, but everything else is right around average for my region (Pacific NW)

You would be shocked that the majority of French-Americans live here as do the Irish and British. German is not very common....only in Connecticut where they had a small community.