Shubotai
06-04-2018, 06:35 PM
The Turkic languages consist of an eastern (Common Turkic) and a western branch (Oghur Turkic) which are further divided into six branches: Oghuz, Arghu, Kipchak, Oghur, Karluk and Siberian Turkic as this appears in the following scheme[1]:
Proto-Turkic
Common Turkic (Eastern)
Oghuz
Kipchak
Karluk
Siberian
Arghu
Oghur Turkic (Western)
Chuvash
Bulgar (extinct)
Khazar? (extinct)
Indicatively, the following map can be seen: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/1/1e/20171201152517%21Lenguas_t%C3%BArquicas.png
The separation between eastern and western branches could have been as early as the division of the Göktürk Empire (https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-nV1KA2UoJIQ/WoRLvrpLWDI/AAAAAAAAS0o/PHQ-VZmN5cwvjqanL0KsrBgwN0JHZ99uQCLcBGAs/s640/Map_CentralAsia_AD600_BWB.jpg). The Orkhon inscriptions are already in Common Turkic. The westernmost part of the khaganate was controlled by the Khazars.
The predominant y-dna haplogroup among Turkmen people has been found to be Q-M25[2][3]. In Turkey, according to a research, among 523 samples 9 Q*, 1 Q-M25, 4 R-M73 were found [4]. However this haplogroup is found with a frequency of 13% among Afshar Turks in Turkey[5], whereas it could be even higher among Turkomans. Azerbaijani Turks also display varying frequencies of y-dna Q from 1-10% in Northern Iran[6]. Turkmenistan is also the source region for the population which turkified Anatolia and Azerbaijan. Therefore it is gathered that the original haplogroup among Oghuz Turks was probably Q-M25.
Tatars and Bashkirs display high frequencies (up to 15%) for haplogroup Q[7][8]. For quite a while, the predominant y-dna haplogroup among Kipchak Turks was thought to be R1b-M73, but this subsequently has been overturned, as pointed out by Behar et al. 2010, it is actually Q. The prevalent Q subclade among Karakalpaks is Q-M346[9]. Haplogroup Q* is found with a frequency 48% among the Kangly tribe of Kazakhs[10].
The most frequent clade of Q-M242 among Uzbeks and Uyghurs, the two parts of the Karluk family is Q-M346, with the occasional existence of other clades.
Siberian Turks belong overwhelmingly to the Q-M346 branch, whilst R-M73 is also present among all of them, alas in very low frequencies, and as was pointed earlier this might actually prove to be Q-M25[11][12][13].
Arghu turkic is a divergent branch of Common Turkic and its sole represenatitve, Khalaj has a small population in Iran which has apparently not been tested. However, the Ghilji Pashtun tribe of neighbouring Afghanistan, which purportedly stems to a large degree from Khalaj Turks, displays a high frequency of Q-L275.[14]
Ashkenazi Jewish carry 5% of the y-dna Q-M378, which is a subclade of Q-L275 and given their origins in Eastern Europe, where they could actually refer to Khazar ancestry, since Khazars had a quite powerful state in the Ukrainian steppes with Judaism as the main religion [15]. In Bulgaria, we also have cases of Q-L275 which are more numerous than other Q subclades[16]. Bulgars were an oghuric speaking tribe.
The little samples among Chuvash belonging to haplogroup Q-M242 belong to the Q-M25 subclade.
The phylogeny of haplogroup Q-M242 and its subclades with their defining mutations according to the 2018 ISOGG tree is presented below[17]:
Q-M242 M242
Q-F903 (Q1)
Q-F1096 F1096, F1215
Q-NWT01 NWT01
Q-M120 M120, M265/N14
Q-M25 M25, M143
Q-L712 L712
Q-M346 L56, L57, M346, L528
Q-L53 L53
Q-L54 L54
Q-CTS11969 CTS11969, M930
Q-M3 M3
Q-M19 M19
Q-L804 L804
Q-CTS1780 CTS1780, M981, M971, Z780
Q-L330 L330
Q-F835 F835, L940
Q-F1161 F1161
Q-L527 L527
Q-L275 L275, L314 (Q2)
Q-M378 M378/Page100, L214, L215/Page82
Q-FGC1774 FGC1774, Y2016
Q-245 L245
Q-Y1150 Y1150
Therefore, it can be seen that there is a general resemblance between the phylogeny of haplogroup Q-M242 in the Old World and the classification scheme of the Turkic languages. Specifically, Q-F903 could match to Common Turkic while Q-L275 is a much better match for Oghur Turkic. Furthermore, Q-M25 could relate to Oghuz and Kipchak branches, while Q-M346 correlates more with the Karluk and Siberian turkic branches. A subclade of Q-M346, namely Q-L330 is known to have close correlation with the Yeniseian language family.
It is subsequently proposed that the various subclades of haplogroup Q-M242 had a prominent role in the diversification of the Turkic languages and the expansion of Turkic speaking peoples[18].
[1] Lars Johanson (1998) http://www.turkiclanguages.com/www/classification.html
[2] http://генофонд.рф/wp-content/uploads/3_2016-antr-p-086_096-print.pdf
[3] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-03176-z
[4] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00439-003-1031-4
[5] https://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3328565/
[6] http://images.biomedsearch.com/22815981/pone.0041252.t001.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIBOKHYOLP 4MBMRGQ&Expires=1528243200&Signature=bMWznO9D3pcoka9mUyNRNhVTWrA%3D http://www.biomedsearch.com/nih/Ancient-migratory-events-in-middle/22815981.html
[7] http://s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/60_Genetics/TurkicGenetics.htm http://s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/60_Genetics/KazanTatarsY_DNA.gif
[8] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134%2FS0026893316060029
[9] https://images.nature.com/full/nature-assets/ejhg/journal/v23/n10/extref/ejhg2014285x5.pdf
[10] http://docplayer.ru/60705358-Federalnoe-gosudarstvennoe-byudzhetnoe-uchrezhdenie-nauki-institut-obshchey-genetiki-im-n-i-vavilova-rossiyskoy-akademii-nauk-zhabagin-maksat-kizatovich.html
[11] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380230/
[12] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276666
[13] https://www.nature.com/articles/jhg201164
[14] https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-016-0870-2
[15] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313459023_Phylogeography_of_human_Y-chromosome_haplogroup_Q3-L275_from_an_academiccitizen_science_collaboration
[16] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0056779
[17] https://isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpQ.html
[18] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319526529_Dispersals_of_the_Siberian_Y-chromosome_haplogroup_Q_in_Eurasia
Proto-Turkic
Common Turkic (Eastern)
Oghuz
Kipchak
Karluk
Siberian
Arghu
Oghur Turkic (Western)
Chuvash
Bulgar (extinct)
Khazar? (extinct)
Indicatively, the following map can be seen: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/1/1e/20171201152517%21Lenguas_t%C3%BArquicas.png
The separation between eastern and western branches could have been as early as the division of the Göktürk Empire (https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-nV1KA2UoJIQ/WoRLvrpLWDI/AAAAAAAAS0o/PHQ-VZmN5cwvjqanL0KsrBgwN0JHZ99uQCLcBGAs/s640/Map_CentralAsia_AD600_BWB.jpg). The Orkhon inscriptions are already in Common Turkic. The westernmost part of the khaganate was controlled by the Khazars.
The predominant y-dna haplogroup among Turkmen people has been found to be Q-M25[2][3]. In Turkey, according to a research, among 523 samples 9 Q*, 1 Q-M25, 4 R-M73 were found [4]. However this haplogroup is found with a frequency of 13% among Afshar Turks in Turkey[5], whereas it could be even higher among Turkomans. Azerbaijani Turks also display varying frequencies of y-dna Q from 1-10% in Northern Iran[6]. Turkmenistan is also the source region for the population which turkified Anatolia and Azerbaijan. Therefore it is gathered that the original haplogroup among Oghuz Turks was probably Q-M25.
Tatars and Bashkirs display high frequencies (up to 15%) for haplogroup Q[7][8]. For quite a while, the predominant y-dna haplogroup among Kipchak Turks was thought to be R1b-M73, but this subsequently has been overturned, as pointed out by Behar et al. 2010, it is actually Q. The prevalent Q subclade among Karakalpaks is Q-M346[9]. Haplogroup Q* is found with a frequency 48% among the Kangly tribe of Kazakhs[10].
The most frequent clade of Q-M242 among Uzbeks and Uyghurs, the two parts of the Karluk family is Q-M346, with the occasional existence of other clades.
Siberian Turks belong overwhelmingly to the Q-M346 branch, whilst R-M73 is also present among all of them, alas in very low frequencies, and as was pointed earlier this might actually prove to be Q-M25[11][12][13].
Arghu turkic is a divergent branch of Common Turkic and its sole represenatitve, Khalaj has a small population in Iran which has apparently not been tested. However, the Ghilji Pashtun tribe of neighbouring Afghanistan, which purportedly stems to a large degree from Khalaj Turks, displays a high frequency of Q-L275.[14]
Ashkenazi Jewish carry 5% of the y-dna Q-M378, which is a subclade of Q-L275 and given their origins in Eastern Europe, where they could actually refer to Khazar ancestry, since Khazars had a quite powerful state in the Ukrainian steppes with Judaism as the main religion [15]. In Bulgaria, we also have cases of Q-L275 which are more numerous than other Q subclades[16]. Bulgars were an oghuric speaking tribe.
The little samples among Chuvash belonging to haplogroup Q-M242 belong to the Q-M25 subclade.
The phylogeny of haplogroup Q-M242 and its subclades with their defining mutations according to the 2018 ISOGG tree is presented below[17]:
Q-M242 M242
Q-F903 (Q1)
Q-F1096 F1096, F1215
Q-NWT01 NWT01
Q-M120 M120, M265/N14
Q-M25 M25, M143
Q-L712 L712
Q-M346 L56, L57, M346, L528
Q-L53 L53
Q-L54 L54
Q-CTS11969 CTS11969, M930
Q-M3 M3
Q-M19 M19
Q-L804 L804
Q-CTS1780 CTS1780, M981, M971, Z780
Q-L330 L330
Q-F835 F835, L940
Q-F1161 F1161
Q-L527 L527
Q-L275 L275, L314 (Q2)
Q-M378 M378/Page100, L214, L215/Page82
Q-FGC1774 FGC1774, Y2016
Q-245 L245
Q-Y1150 Y1150
Therefore, it can be seen that there is a general resemblance between the phylogeny of haplogroup Q-M242 in the Old World and the classification scheme of the Turkic languages. Specifically, Q-F903 could match to Common Turkic while Q-L275 is a much better match for Oghur Turkic. Furthermore, Q-M25 could relate to Oghuz and Kipchak branches, while Q-M346 correlates more with the Karluk and Siberian turkic branches. A subclade of Q-M346, namely Q-L330 is known to have close correlation with the Yeniseian language family.
It is subsequently proposed that the various subclades of haplogroup Q-M242 had a prominent role in the diversification of the Turkic languages and the expansion of Turkic speaking peoples[18].
[1] Lars Johanson (1998) http://www.turkiclanguages.com/www/classification.html
[2] http://генофонд.рф/wp-content/uploads/3_2016-antr-p-086_096-print.pdf
[3] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-03176-z
[4] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00439-003-1031-4
[5] https://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3328565/
[6] http://images.biomedsearch.com/22815981/pone.0041252.t001.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIBOKHYOLP 4MBMRGQ&Expires=1528243200&Signature=bMWznO9D3pcoka9mUyNRNhVTWrA%3D http://www.biomedsearch.com/nih/Ancient-migratory-events-in-middle/22815981.html
[7] http://s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/60_Genetics/TurkicGenetics.htm http://s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/60_Genetics/KazanTatarsY_DNA.gif
[8] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134%2FS0026893316060029
[9] https://images.nature.com/full/nature-assets/ejhg/journal/v23/n10/extref/ejhg2014285x5.pdf
[10] http://docplayer.ru/60705358-Federalnoe-gosudarstvennoe-byudzhetnoe-uchrezhdenie-nauki-institut-obshchey-genetiki-im-n-i-vavilova-rossiyskoy-akademii-nauk-zhabagin-maksat-kizatovich.html
[11] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380230/
[12] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276666
[13] https://www.nature.com/articles/jhg201164
[14] https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-016-0870-2
[15] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313459023_Phylogeography_of_human_Y-chromosome_haplogroup_Q3-L275_from_an_academiccitizen_science_collaboration
[16] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0056779
[17] https://isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpQ.html
[18] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319526529_Dispersals_of_the_Siberian_Y-chromosome_haplogroup_Q_in_Eurasia