Scholarios, how many serious historians in the world take seriously the genetic results in their studies?
Printable View
Scholarios, how many serious historians in the world take seriously the genetic results in their studies?
I don't have any I2a1 among my 1250 relatives. Any other name for this?
0% I2a1b among my DNA relatives, which is why I plot like a civilized ancient beast.
:D
For Tosks, maybe you are right. (though the Arbereshe studies show a lot of I2 and R1a) On Northern Greece, Battaglia did, and I think some others. It seems to me that Northern Greeks are strangely the most tested. I think Catgeorge posted those here very recently.
And it isn't just that. Look at the Greek family dna projects, this clade is found a lot there. Even if it is unorganized, it seems obvious to me. Probably some of it was even brought by Arvanites :cool: