I think it is based on the Y-DNA of the samples that match closely our autosomal genome. So, even though I am R1a, if you notice, the top 3 lineages in Albanians all come first for me, which makes sense.
Printable View
61.2% R1b for samples that match kit
https://i.imgur.com/d7cXZNY.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/fSFXkWP.jpg
apparently i have a deep dive match with 3 Celtic York gladiators and the Celtic bronze age Boscombe bowman. i wuz Celt
My haplogroup analytics:
Y-DNA:
R1b 27%
J 24.3%
E1b 18.9%
T 8.1%
G 5.4%
I1 5.4%
R1a 5.4%
E 2.7%
I2 2.7%
Didn't expect R1b to be that high. I guess if we were to look at the haplogroups of my actual ancestors, it would maybe be around 10%.
Mt-DNA:
H1+H3 20.2%
H 12.6%
T2 10.1%
U5 7.59%
K 6.32%
I 5.06%
HV0+V 5.06%
HV 5.06%
H5 3.79%
J 3.79%
T1 3.79%
U 3.79%
X 2.53%
W 2.53%
M 2.53%
L 2.53%
U2 1.26%
R 1.26%
https://i.imgur.com/YyzvHOI.png
look at the clustering of ancient samples(red X's)
we have too much samples from NW Europe and Iberia compared to the rest of the world, and they are mostly r1b. that's why everybody has mostly r1b mathces i presume.
You guys are reading too much into the new haplogroup analysis thing here...its just the frequency of haploid from your ancient matches. At least a vast majority of the time its gonna be irrelevant to your own...
With that being said, my mom matches the Ukraine Scythian with mtdna N1b1a closer than 99%. I myself am N1b1b per 23. This makes me wonder if Scythian and sarmatians picked up and spread some west Asian and SE euro lineages and spread them to NE Europe...