Your ancestry doesn't match up with the results on Rochefaton's chart.
Printable View
Your ancestry doesn't match up with the results on Rochefaton's chart.
Well, that's the one he did for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anachronistic
My results vary greatly from run to run.
Maybe the Swedes and Norwegians I'm compared to are short with light brown hair (which is me) instead of the stereotypical tall blonde ones.
Is the South Baltic admixture component in people from Italy, Spain, and Portugal attributed to the Goths, Visigoths, Vandals, and Slavic people who came to those countries? Is the South Baltic component also correlated with the haplogroup R1a?
I'm not sure, but Suebi and Vandals were both East Germanic. Visigoths were not, although they seem to have lived on the shores of the Baltic as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOne
Hey Roche could you do a chart for me:)
Graham:
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k.../UK19Chart.jpg
Closest 5:
DK 2.84
CEU 3.49
NL 3.77
UK 4.38
Kent 4.65
Pallantides:
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k...ChartNEU12.jpg
DK 2.55
NO 3.32
NL 3.59
CEU 3.73
US 4.74
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochefaton
You are my hero!
New version of this picture with more samples. I made a red circle around me :p
http://oi43.tinypic.com/mt09cw.jpg
Another red circle appear!Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Delarge
http://i.imgur.com/RSVDG.jpg
This latest run is showing some weird results for people of mixed ancestry. I don't know what reasoning there could be for this, and Polako is probably the only person that could give us an explanation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anachronistic
All my spreadsheet does is apply the RMSD formula to the data Polako has produced.