0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 391/29 Given: 482/72 |
Your ancestry doesn't match up with the results on Rochefaton's chart.










| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9,001/107 Given: 10,934/488 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 79/0 Given: 37/0 |
Is the South Baltic admixture component in people from Italy, Spain, and Portugal attributed to the Goths, Visigoths, Vandals, and Slavic people who came to those countries? Is the South Baltic component also correlated with the haplogroup R1a?


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 437/31 Given: 0/0 |
Hey Roche could you do a chart for me![]()



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 295/1 Given: 132/0 |
Graham:
Closest 5:
DK 2.84
CEU 3.49
NL 3.77
UK 4.38
Kent 4.65
Pallantides:
DK 2.55
NO 3.32
NL 3.59
CEU 3.73
US 4.74


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 437/31 Given: 0/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 14,289/151 Given: 3,333/0 |
New version of this picture with more samples. I made a red circle around me
![]()
Click for peruvian rage:
Spoiler!


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 437/31 Given: 0/0 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 295/1 Given: 132/0 |
This latest run is showing some weird results for people of mixed ancestry. I don't know what reasoning there could be for this, and Polako is probably the only person that could give us an explanation.
All my spreadsheet does is apply the RMSD formula to the data Polako has produced.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks