https://i.imgur.com/cNtkV4b.jpg
Printable View
Nice results all
I don't think so, it must be much more ancient than any Germans here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
Remember that Germans are descended from East Francia after 843 AD.
Only as a political entity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
As a mass migration of people too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
Early Medieval genomes from what is now Bavaria and Swabia do not cluster with modern South Germans, not even with modern North Germans - but with Danes from Jutland and West Frisians in the Netherlands.
So probably they were decimated by Charlemagne who brought in new settlers from the west, and that's how modern South German genetics emerged.
Modern Germans are Eastern French.
Charlemagne destroyed Pagan Saxons and Pagan Bavarians.
Hahahahaha!Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
It is not funny. Old Germans got extinct just like Old Brazilians.Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
Just like Old Poles got massacred by incoming Ukrainians?Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
Or incoming "Ukrainians" encountered empty land, abandoned by "Old Poles" (who moved south to sack Rome)?:Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...and-Discussion
Different results to ancestry results.
[IMG]https://i.ibb.co/QvYThCm/Untitled.png [/IMG]
And here my maternal cousin, amazingly he scores exactly the same amount of North Slavic, 55%:Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
North Slavic 55%
Northwest European 43%
South/Central Euro 1.9%
https://i.imgur.com/b68eUQ3.png
me and my dad, my results are on the bottom
https://i.imgur.com/AknBLEt.png
I have also Gujarati + 7% Finnish. :icon_lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaos One
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Impaler
My results have never been posted here. Re-uploaded today
https://i.ibb.co/DWNXJXB/DNALand2.jpg
Caucasus.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelati
DNA.Land is from far the calculator where I have the lowest Sub-Saharan blood.
https://i.imgur.com/D2UXFsq.png
I uploaded an FTDNA data file (not mine) 4 days ago and the results are still not ready. Why is that?
My dad:Quote:
Originally Posted by nittionia
https://i.imgur.com/z90crj9.png
My mom:
https://i.imgur.com/y1TleO0.png
Do they even process data these days? Thracian converted an FTDNA file for me (old format), 24 hours have passed and it's still not ready.
Sad, another good service is gone this year. First was DNA Tribes.
I uploaded mine February 11th, still waiting lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto
Grandfather(maternal, 50 % from East Finland)
Attachment 86191
Father(Southwest Finn)
Attachment 86192
Me(12,5 % from eastern Finland, Southwest Finn)
Attachment 86193
Long time. No see. Hello to everybody.
Did you get your results? How much "Indus Valley" do you have?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mingle
They don't process the new FTDNA data format. One needs to convert it to the old format.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaglakar
https://wilhelmhgenealogy.wordpress.com/dna-kit-studio/
I received my results though, after more than a month of waiting. In fact, I saw one of your threads about dnaland processing time, didn't know that such a service exists.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto
http://i68.tinypic.com/2zpl98n.jpg
I have 20% south asian based on dna.land. Did not find any kazakhs or other central asian results to compare, but anatolian Turks don't score "Indus Valley".
Finally got them. Seems to be pretty different compared to my 23andMe V5 upload. I'll post both.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaglakar
23andMe:
https://i.imgur.com/JIP0irA.png
FTDNA:
https://i.imgur.com/ClzpVTP.png
The Indus Valley and Kalash are rather Pakistani and North Indian. Maybe even Afghanistan. I think that must be your Indo-Iranian ancestry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaglakar
Indus Valley is based on Burushos, Pashtuns, and Sindhis. From checking the thread on Anthrogenica, Indians get much lower IV than I do. The highest I saw was one Punjabi (MDL) getting 49% with one Nepali Brahmin getting 36%. One Punjabi Jatt got 24% IV. I'd be interested to see how much of it a Sindhi would get.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto
From the DNA Land website:
Weird choice of populations to put in that component.Quote:
Includes: Burusho, Pathan and Sindhi in Pakistan
Does not include: Tajik in (Pomiri) Tajikistan; Uzbek in Uzbekistan; Uygur and Xibo in China; Brahui, Hazara, Kalash and Makrani in Pakistan; Gujarati Indian from Gujarat (expat in Houston TX); Bengali in Bangladesh and Indian Telugu from Southern India (expat in the UK)
...