No, no, you are not going to wiggle out of this. What you said was a personal attack. I was polite/neutral to you. Let me spell it out for you:Quote:
Originally Posted by Croatian Legend
Why It Qualifies as an Insult
“Sorry but you have no idea” > This statement attacks knowledge or competence directly, rather than addressing the substance of the argument.
“don’t actually read scientific papers” > This implies dishonesty or laziness, instead of offering a fair critique of interpretation or reasoning.
“keep repeating the same nonsense as most here” > By labeling points as “nonsense” rather than engaging with them, the comment becomes disparaging and dismissive.
Yeah, if you want to be constructive, don't use language like that or I will take you on. Just realize you f*cked up. I didn't employ that language against you until you said that to me.
Using the emotional argument is weak and cheap move to score "points" After a while of tolerating slights I had enough. I completely explained the reaction. It's not unprovoked.
I can absolutely assume anything I want. You are not going to tell me what not to think.
Let's clear things up. I noticed you had gaps in knowledge too like the comment you made about p-values (which was totally way off) So, when I saw that comment did I immediately insult you? No. I simply said, "That's not correct" and a cited a paper that published an admixture result with a p-value far less than 0.5. I only called it out after you attacked me.
