R1a - either from the Bashkirs or from the Iranians! Let's remind the Arpad came to Hungary from the east!
Printable View
R1a - either from the Bashkirs or from the Iranians! Let's remind the Arpad came to Hungary from the east!
More exactly Gesta considered Árpád as the great grandson of Attila, but Gesta did not care about the elimination of 300 years from the Human history. It is similar to the phantom time hypothesis is a historical conspiracy theory asserted by Heribert Illig.
Western Europeans are not descendants of proto IE people. Most of Hungary is not part of former Pannonian province of the Roman Empire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pannonian_Basin
The name "Pannonian" comes from Pannonia, a province of the Roman Empire. Only the western part of the territory (the so-called Transdanubia) of modern Hungary formed part of the ancient Roman Province of Pannonia; this comprises less than 29% of modern Hungary, therefore Hungarian geographers avoid the terms "Pannonian Basin" and "Pannonian Plain".
Indeed, the Árpád House was well mingled in and mixed with pan-European royalty, descending from all over Europe. Just another proof why Hungary is one of the essential states of Europe as we understand it today (post-Charles Martel). Based on a quick research, particularly Béla III from his mother's side he had Kievan Rus, Anglo Saxon, Byzantine and Varangian ancestry, while from his father's side he had Hungarian, Bulgarian, Serbian, Byzantine, Armenian, Kievan Rus, Varengian, Bohemian, Polish, Lotharingian, Lusatian, Polabian ancestry.
Of course that by late 13th century the Árpád Dynasty was already very involved in European affairs, also providing rulers to other states. The pure "Hungarianness" of the Árpád House ended with Béla I reign (who had a foreign wife) in mid 12th century, whose lineage gave the future kings of mixed ancestry of Hungary.
R1 Turkic pride!
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/74/8c/06/7...7f80ff736f.jpg
Both can be arguably Turkic; it is the degree of Turkicness that is the debate. Not to mention, many Turkic peoples today have various different haplogroups including and outside of R1.
Regardless R1 is Eurasian in origin, and highlights the Asian origins ol that show prominently in our culture and history.
Not necessarily at all. Many Turkic peoples can have very little "Mongoloid" DNA. Besides, you do have East Asian results and a notable Turkic calculator score. Don't fall for the idea that you must be purely "East Asian" to be Turkic; the early Magyars certainly were not this stereotype (they were blend of Ugric and Turkic peoples).
Don't be sad about this R1 result. It shows that we live in times of scentific study and great progress in sorting truth from fiction. As I have always said, as long as Magyars are free in our own country, we will always align with our family in the east.
This doesn't make you any less European or out of place in Europe. Our unique Turkic flavour is not Oghuz, Uyghur, or Pecheneg. We are Magyars, and we embrace our past with pride.
Don't bark on R1ethel. He is in Eupedia described as proto-Slav (M458).Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
I don't know why people dislike being Turks. I do attack modern Turks from Turkey because they are not real Turks but fake Turks.
Being Turk is awesome, great ancestry from Genghis Khan who butchered seas of people, scorched earth etc.. (I mean that's awesome reputation of Turkic Warlord)
But we have a problem of understanding Who is Turk and Who isn't.
There are many wannabe Turks.