2nd Wave: 1.4%
Siberian: 1.21%
Basque: 38.5%
Chuvash: 58.89%
Amerindian: 0%
___________________-
Printable View
2nd Wave: 1.4%
Siberian: 1.21%
Basque: 38.5%
Chuvash: 58.89%
Amerindian: 0%
___________________-
Data sent !
Very interesting project.
He didn't elaborate any further. Wonder what will be different.Quote:
I will include your results in today's or tomorrow's run. It will be a different analysis from previous ones though.
I am Serbia1.
http://dioegenesartemis.blogspot.com...n-part-ii.html
Restricted Pole Run: Part IV- experiments, conjectures
My results:
Siberian1 - 0.00%
WMPC - 40.73%
NMPC - 46.58%
WMPC+NC - 6.25%
EMPC - 1.94%
WMPC+NWAf - 1.85%
Siberian1 - 1.51%
Siberian3 - 1.15%
Populations highest with the components
WMPC: Basque/Sardinian
NMPC: peaks in Chuvash and high in Lithuanian and Belorussian
EMPC: Georgian, Urkarah, Lezgin, Kurd, Adygei, Brahmin, etc. (no order)
WMPC+NC: Palestinian, Druze
WMPC+NWAf: Tunisian
Siberian1: Nganassan
Siberian2: Yakut followed by Buryat
Siberian3: Mongolian, Koryak, Chukchi
Norway2
Siberian1 - 0.61%
WMPC - 31.24%
NMPC - 66.80%
WMPC+NWAf - 0.81%
Siberian3 0.54%
He blogged about me, how nice of him :D
http://dioegenesartemis.blogspot.com...-run-part.htmlQuote:
PonticCaspian, a participant represented in the main graph above, with Moldavian Gagauz and some Ossetian ancestry presents much the same pattern except with higher WMPC (possibly due to proximity to Balkan/West Caucasus populations). Much of the same pattern can be observed in Altaians and Buryats, in a much smaller FC element.
I really don't see population changes after the initial invention/introduction of advanced pastoralism producing such an homogeneous pattern (bear in mind some of these are small components, indeed all of these in the Mongolian case are small, since they're mostly an Eastern population and can be overinflated by the exclusion of major "Siberian" ancestry). Certainly not from Mongolia to the far west. These patterns I think most likely roughly correspond to the original Kurgan pastoralist people, and possibly also to the ancient Tocharian peoples.
Russia2
WMPC-29.56%
NMPC-70.43%
Norway1
WMPC -38.13%
NMPC - 57.71%
WMPC+NC - 1.87%
EMPC - 0.07%
Siberian3 - 2.21%
Norway2
Siberian2 - 0.61% *
WMPC - 31.24%
NMPC - 66.80%
WMPC+NWAf - 0.81%
Siberian3 0.54%
Norway3
WMPC - 37.93%
NMPC - 59.11%
WMPC+NC - 1.64%
Siberian1 - 1.31%
Sweden1
WMPC - 34.22%
NMPC - 55.99%
WMPC+NC - 2.03%
EMPC - 3.41%
WMPC+NWAf - 1.76%
Siberian1 - 2.08%
Siberian3 - 0.50%
Sweden2
WMPC - 32.80%
NMPC - 67.09%
WMPC+NC - 0.05%
Siberian3 - 0.05%
SwedenNorway1
WMPC - 32.87%
NMPC - 58.69%
EMPC - 8.26%
Siberian3 - 0.18%
SwedenNorway2
WMPC - 34.50%
NMPC - 60.60%
EMPC - 4.21%
Siberian1 - 0.51%
Siberian 3 - 0.18%
SwedenNorway3
Siberian2 - 2.68%
WMPC - 30.60%
NMPC - 59.16%
EMPC - 7.55%
WNorway1
WMPC - 41.15%
NMPC - 58.84%
* I made an error, I'm 0.61% in Siberian2 and not Siberian1.
WMPC - 41.54%
NMPC - 51.76%
EMPC - 6.2%
Siberian3 - .5%
Someone help me out and tell me what these abbreviations mean?
WMPC (peaks in Western Europeans, especially in Sardinians and Basques):
NPMC (peaks in Eastern Europeans, especially in Russians and Chuvashians):
EMPC (peaks in the Balkans and the Caucasus, especially in the Northern Caucasus):
Siberian 3 (peaks in Northeast Asians near the bering strait, especially in Koryaks and Chuckchis):
Results for mwa (USA10):
Siberian 2: 0%
WMPC: 39.34%
NMPC: 47.50%
WMPC+NC: 0%
EMPC: 13.16%
WMPC+NWAf: 0%
Siberian 1: 0%
Siberian 3: 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pallantides
Do you know who Norway1 is, I'd like to meet him/her.
Siberian2 - 0.00%
WMPC - 33.25%
NMPC - 57.92%
WMPC+NC - 0.24%
EMPC - 5.83%
WMPC+NWAf - 2.76%
Siberian1 - 0.00%
Siberian2 - 0.00%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Rêveur
It's Olavsson
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/member.php?u=2568