My true ancestry.com

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pribislav

Serbian ethnonym came from R1a probably. I2-PH908 became Serbian long time ago, in 4th or 5th century.
In 7th century Serbs were already pred. I2-PH908.

---

But those people who Joined Serbs are Not Proto-Serbs as you have described them.

I am not saying they are not Serbs, but rather how Serbian nation was formed -> by making Dalmatian and Central Serbian and Bosnian Latins into Slavic Serbian people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by North Sea

You are more South than me, so is *****. I assume I would match more Northern samples.

That other calc Voskos posted also gave me more match with Northern samples and less with Mycanean.

---

We are also geographically more south than you. Makes sense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paradox

Again you presume. My father has never "lamented" anything to me. I have mentioned on here previously how he won't discuss his origins with me. What I know was told to me by my mother.
Thank you for your concern re relocating to Romania but he is quite happy living in Australia. Thank God he migrated to Australia and what I do know via my mother is that he hopes to never step foot in Greece again.
Now go away and keep living in your delusional world.

---

You hate Greece so much but can't stop talking about it. He doesn't want to set foot there again, looks like a win-win to me.

Just adding this in case anyone missed it. Over 10 means it is only an ancestral link but not really part of your ancestry. They most likely don't have enough ancients from all areas for people to match really well.

Genetic distance measures how close you are to a given sample.
10 means this is your ancient ancestry
20 means this is part of your ancestral link
30 means possibly related to your ancestry

I was just noticing on some people's results the distances weren't really close. Something to bear in mind.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bosniensis

But those people who Joined Serbs are Not Proto-Serbs as you have described them.

I am not saying they are not Serbs, but rather how Serbian nation was formed -> by making Dalmatian and Central Serbian and Bosnian Latins into Slavic Serbian people.

---

I2-PH908 participated in Serbian ethno-genesis in north, outsude of Balkan.

I2-PH908 have nothing to do with Romans and Vlachs. Serbs abssorbed most of E-V13, J2 and R1b in the Balkans, not I2-PH908.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bosniensis

Celts right? La Tene were Celts or Gauls.

And Gauls were Romans from (Cisalpine Gaul) , they even participated in early Rome during formation period. (except those in Gaul)

Gauls, Southern Spaniards, Northern Italians were (I2a2, I2a1a, I2a1*) namely EXTINCT Western Mediterranean people (Sardinian like) -> which is why Rome moved to East.

---

Yes. La Tene were celts and inhabited old Hallstatt and parts of North Serbia/Croatia. The new map now has us moving from La Tene into Raska in 200AD. I might contact the owner of the site, asking him what it's all about, no I2a-din has been found in La Tene as far as I'm aware.

https://media.discordapp.net/attachm...400&height=275

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dick

Are you Albanian?

---

Seems more like Proto Serbian results :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley

Just adding this in case anyone missed it. Over 10 means it is only an ancestral link but not really part of your ancestry. They most likely don't have enough ancients from all areas for people to match really well.

Genetic distance measures how close you are to a given sample.
10 means this is your ancient ancestry
20 means this is part of your ancestral link
30 means possibly related to your ancestry

I was just noticing on some people's results the distances weren't really close. Something to bear in mind.

---

Thanks Grace. Now I'm interpreting mine better, the single Roman or Greek are further than ancient roman + greek (meaning Albanian) which has a distance of 4.

I WAS ILLYRIANS!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley

Just adding this in case anyone missed it. Over 10 means it is only an ancestral link but not really part of your ancestry. They most likely don't have enough ancients from all areas for people to match really well.

Genetic distance measures how close you are to a given sample.
10 means this is your ancient ancestry
20 means this is part of your ancestral link
30 means possibly related to your ancestry

I was just noticing on some people's results the distances weren't really close. Something to bear in mind.

---

I literally have zero ancient population samples within 10 or less, lol. But I thought that was quite normal? From what I understand ancient samples will always be at a far distance because we are all mixed with modern populations nowadays, so it'll never be perfect.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dosas

First of all, Aromanians are part of the Greek ethnogenesis and very patriotic. Not my fault her Romanian dad got stuck on the wrong side of the border after the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire.

Secondly, my Anatolian grandad crushed your little Slavic ancestor uprisings a couple of times. So to the victor go the spoils.

Lastly, I am not offended by my Near East admixture you OWD clown, I am proud of it. Now fuck off, like a good little boy that you are. You can still hope for a pity handjob, white knight loser.

---

It doesn't matter to me whether you feel offended or not, you turkish mutt. Leave Macedonian affairs to Macedonians.