I have been updated ancients populations.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...ations2024.jpg
Printable View
I have been updated ancients populations.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...ations2024.jpg
I have adjusted to BC and this is my PCA
Medieval Belgium? I never cease to be amazed.
Later I might tell Chtgpt about it, we have a very special relationship, we simply like each other. :cool:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...boutsMine.jpeg
It’s not bad. According to this site my Baltic ancestry comes from Curonian tribes and my Balkan is from White Croats.
https://i.imgur.com/bccfrjy.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/eMDpOYQ.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/rRRYqcC.jpeg
Ancient
Visigoth + Celt (3.632)
Viking Danish + Frank (3.723)
Anglo Saxon + Frank (4.259)
Celt + Frank (4.294)
Viking Danish + Visigoth (5.063)
Frank (5.679)
Celt (6.899)
Anglo Saxon (7.853)
Visigoth (8.412)
Viking Danish (8.782)
Attachment 134656
Modern
Southeast_English (5.381)
North_German (5.560)
North_Dutch (5.846)
Irish (5.936)
Southwest_English (6.133)
Danish (6.419)
West_Scottish (6.560)
Orcadian (7.179)
Attachment 134655
The bottom of the bottom site, spamming every day about discounts on my email.
Somehow i share 50 cm of dna with some ancient DNA, and thats how much i share with matches i had same great great great great father on regular sites. Ha ha ha sure!
https://i.postimg.cc/XYQp08nD/asla.jpg
Belgium = Dutch = Danish = Swedish = Norwegian = Viking = Gallop viking confirmed , first Spanish in history who managed to have a northwestern european shift with only 31,2% European Hunter Gatherer on IllustrativednaQuote:
Originally Posted by Gallop
https://i.ibb.co/rxmr80y/IMG-5687.jpg
picpaste website
Anglo Saxon + Frank (2.814)
Visigoth + Anglo Saxon (2.857)
Viking Norwegian + Frank (2.916)
Visigoth + Celt (2.934)
Celt + Frank (3.124)
Frank (6.522)
Viking Norwegian (6.947)
Anglo Saxon (7.02)
Visigoth (7.122)
Celt (7.14)
Viking + Scythian (4.402)
Viking + White Croat (4.734)
Scythian + Early Slav (5.321)
Viking + Kievan Rus (5.903)
Kievan Rus + Early Slav (5.904)
Kievan Rus (7.804)
Early Slav (8.222)
Viking (9.587)
White Croat (10.46)
Scythian (11.67)
Your closest genetic modern populations...
1. Polish (3.661)
2. South_Polish (5.152)
3. Russian_Smolensk (5.557)
4. Southwest_Russian (6.204)
5. Belorussian (6.409)
6. Estonian_Polish (6.757)
7. Ukrainian_Belgorod (6.776)
8. Ukrainian (6.779)
Attachment 134795
Attachment 134794
Your closest genetic modern populations...
Info
1. North_Dutch (6.513)
2. Danish (6.912)
3. Norwegian (7.026)
4. West_German (7.087)
5. Orcadian (7.275)
6. West_Norwegian (7.566)
7. Southwest_English (7.858)
8. Southeast_English (7.904)
Closest genetic modern populations from mytrueancestry.com
1. West_German (5.567)
2. Flemish (7.473)
3. German_Central (8.002)
4. Welsh (8.589)
5. South_Dutch (9.559)
6. East_German (10.69)
7. North_German (10.96)
8. Norwegian (10.96)
Attachment 134874
Closet Ancient populations
Visigoth + Goth (4.51)
Scythian + Anglo Saxon (4.721)
Goth + Frank (4.766)
Scythian + Frank (4.94)
Visigoth + Scythian (4.957)
Frank (5.4)
Visigoth (6.038)
Goth (9.171)
Anglo Saxon (10.17)
Scythian (10.61)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick
https://i.ibb.co/8NFSRXF/photo-2024-12-07-16-41-31.jpg
:thumb001:
https://i.imgur.com/W3AiDsS.png
https://i.imgur.com/Qeiskjl.png
Gepid + Frank (3.901)
Western Scythian + Frank (4.88)
Visigoth + Gepid (5.082)
Frank (6.205)
Frank + Cherusci (6.566)
Visigoth + Western Scythian (6.582)
Gepid (8.516)
Cherusci (9.433)
Western Scythian (9.481)
Visigoth (9.552)
https://i.imgur.com/VMxUUgy.png
Very Western for somebody 1/4 Slovak.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Elizabeth~
Your closest genetic modern populations...
1. French (6.775)
2. South_Dutch (8.370)
3. Flemish (8.912)
4. West_German (9.974)
5. Welsh (10.93)
6. East_German (11.25)
7. Spanish_Galicia (11.39)
8. Southwest_English (12.30)
https://i.imgur.com/XmMVRM5.png
I used my MyHeritage raw data. My current MyHeritage update gives me only English and German, no Slavic at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonislav Hagencik
Your closest Ancient populations...
Attachment 135056
Viking Danish + Celt (2.797)
Viking Danish (3.884)
Viking Danish + Frank (4.706)
Viking Danish + Gael (4.729)
Viking Danish + Celtic Parisi (4.746)
Gael + Frank (4.855)
Celt (5.974)
Gael (7.513)
Celtic Parisi (7.734)
Frank (7.85)
Your closest genetic modern populations...
1. North_German (6.020)
2. Irish (7.951)
3. Southeast_English (8.351)
4. South_Dutch (8.661)
5. Danish (8.721)
6. West_Scottish (8.916)
7. Southwest_English (9.216)
8. North_Dutch (9.650)
Closest Ancient Populations:
Celtic Britons
Celts
Anglo Saxons
Celtic Dobunni
Gaels
Celt + Anglo Saxon (5.525)
Celt + Celtic Dobunni (5.833)
Celt + Briton (6.1)
Celt + Gael (6.16)
Gael + Anglo Saxon (6.221)
Briton (6.537)
Gael (7.074)
Celt (7.733)
Celtic Dobunni (7.745)
Anglo Saxon (7.887)
Your closest genetic modern populations...
1. Southwest_English (5.976)
2. Southeast_English (6.397)
3. West_Scottish (7.430)
4. Orcadian (7.444)
5. Irish (7.790)
6. Danish (9.520)
7. North_Dutch (9.700)
8. South_Dutch (9.882)
Deep Dive Results Top 5:
Medieval Ireland Kilteasheen 650 AD
KIL004
mtDNA: U5a1f1a1Y-DNA: R1b1a1b1a1a2 (P312/PF6547/S116)
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 47)
3 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 19.21 cM
Largest chain: 461 SNPs / 10.47 cM
You are a top 98 % match to this sample! This makes your relationship to this individual exceptional.
Carolingian Era Groningen Netherlands 1090 AD
GRO024
mtDNA: H3b7Y-DNA: R1b1a1b1a1a2a1b1a1a (CTS4299)
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 51)
4 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 30.46 cM
Largest chain: 279 SNPs / 9.65 cM
You are a top 98 % match to this sample! This makes your relationship to this individual exceptional.
Trumpington Meadows Bronze Age 2705 BC
TRM101
mtDNA: K1a20Y-DNA: I2a2a (PF6915)
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 70)
5 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 76.11 cM
Largest chain: 294 SNPs / 32.35 cM
You are a top 97 % match to this sample! This makes your relationship to this individual exceptional.
Bronze Age Orkney Westray Links of Noltland 1319 BC
KD047
mtDNA: H39Y-DNA: I2a1a2a1a2 (A1150/Y13519)
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 15)
4 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 9.07 cM
Largest chain: 168 SNPs / 3.23 cM
You are a top 97 % match to this sample! This makes your relationship to this individual exceptional.
Trumpington Meadows Bronze Age 2705 BC
TRM102
mtDNA: K1a20Y-DNA: I2a2a (PF6915)
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 64)
5 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 66.68 cM
Largest chain: 234 SNPs / 31.67 cM
You are a top 97 % match to this sample! This makes your relationship to this individual exceptional.
Closest ancient populations:
Goth + Kievan Rus (5.52)
Scythian + Kievan Rus (5.593)
Goth + Early Slav (6.995)
Goth + White Croat (7.227)
Scythian + Early Slav (7.556)
Scythian (8.846)
Kievan Rus (10.48)
White Croat (10.87)
Goth (12.8)
Early Slav (13.14)
Closest modern populations
1. Ukrainian (6.272)
2. Ukrainian_Lviv (6.847)
3. South_Polish (7.741)
4. Polish (9.337)
5. Slovenian (10.25)
6. Hungarian (10.30)
7. Croatian (10.48)
8. East_German (11.84)
https://ibb.co/Kxz9w90
I purchased up to Olympus level with some extra lightning bolts. This site is very buyer beware. They're selling as matches things even under 1cM and statistically, the chances of such short segments being false positive are the slightest sliver below 100%.
To their credit, on my timeline I found a few matches to Amerindian which prompted digging which actually seems to be true even though most big boxes don't pick up any such thing on me. Since I'm a white American with some ancestry to the colonial times, circa 1650 with ancestors living in what was the frontier in those days, it's absolutely possible. I've found some SNPs indicative of it and I've gotten some results on Genomelink that point to it as well. It's a small minority ancestry, 5-8 generations back.
Closest ancient populations:
Belgae + Frank (4.357)
Belgae + Cherusci (5.028)
Belgae + Gepid (5.147)
Nemetes + Frank (5.236)
Nemetes + Cherusci (6.012)
Frank (7.08)
Belgae (7.099)
Gepid (8.805)
Cherusci (9.034)
Nemetes (9.368)
Closest modern populations:
1. South_Dutch (9.989)
2. French (11.77)
3. Austrian (11.99)
4. North_German (12.80)
5. East_German (13.47)
6. Flemish (13.58)
7. Southwest_English (14.35)
8. Spanish_Cataluna (14.37)
Do you have G25 coordinates...?Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Eckard
Christine_scaled,0.12556020,0.13307604,0.05184640, 0.03107808,0.03749054,0.01637760,0.00380132,0.0063 5198,0.00962308,0.00818230,-0.00552864,0.00539308,-0.00899860,-0.00142410,0.01388770,0.00195946,-0.01162128,0.00275482,0.00070350,0.00311326,0.0039 1300,0.00111186,0.00097712,0.00071912,0.00286926Quote:
Originally Posted by gixajo
It caught my attention that you had the Catalan reference of K13 that MyTrueAncestry uses at a relatively short distance from you so I played a bit with your coordinates, sorry...Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Eckard
It could only indicate some French ancestry(according to your avatar you seem to have Belgian ancestry), but you tend to score quite often on some Spanish references, but also you score some residual Iberomaurissian on Davidski´s Ancient Standard Model, and that could point more to a real Spanish (or Portuguese) ancestry.
You don't have any knowledge of Spanish ancestors, do you?
Are those simulated G25 coordinates?Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Eckard
Target: Christine_scaled
Distance: 0.0103% / 0.01033283 | R4P
45.2 Iceland
34.9 Spain
14.6 Belarus
5.3 Azerbaijan
Target: Christine_scaled
Distance: 0.0102% / 0.01015451 | ADC: 0.25x RC
49.4 England
28.8 Spain
17.9 Belarus
2.5 Pakistan
0.8 Wales
0.6 Nepal
Target: Christine_scaled
Distance: 0.0130% / 0.01302792 | ADC: 0.5x RC
70.6 Belgium
27.2 Germany
2.2 Nepal
Makes more sense with ADC 0.5x
I'm not sure what you mean. I uploaded my 23andme and it that was it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Well before the update to get "real" G25 coordinates you'd get them from Illustrativedna.com. The other source would be Davidski himself. At least that's what I've heard.
Ancient Sample Breakdown piechart:
Attachment 135905
Adds up to 77.34% Celtic
Deep Dive piechart:
Attachment 135906
around 78.5% Celtic
I currently have the level 4 Caesar upgrade. Not sure if that would affect these percentages that much.
Closest ancient populations:
Viking + Svear (7.588)
Viking + Curonian (8.638)
Svear + Scythian (9.269)
Svear + Curonian (9.693)
Viking + Ostrogoth (9.9)
Svear (10.05)
Scythian (12.6)
Viking (13.21)
Curonian (14.38)
Ostrogoth (15.99)
Closest modern populations:
1. Finnish (3.020)
2. Southwest_Finnish (5.737)
3. East_Finnish (7.475)
4. Estonian (10.56)
5. North_Swedish (11.13)
6. German_Central (13.38)
7. Polish (13.56)
8. South_Polish (14.28)
Well the above were my DNAGenics coordinates. This is Illustrative DNA:
Christine__scaled,0.125205,0.131003,0.053551,0.027 455,0.0397,0.011713,0.00893,0.008307,0.002045,0.00 4009,-0.004709,0.005095,-0.005946,0.001927,0.011808,-0.004773,-0.01682,0.004687,0.006913,-0.008629,0.001622,0.002473,-0.004067,0.009881,-0.000239
What the hell is Nepal? That's DNAgenics. I posted my Illustrative DNA in the above post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
See 2 posts above. Straight from Illustrative DNA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
I have no such knowledge, no. My Heritage says 2.6% Iberian with an additional genetic group of "Mexicans in New Mexico and Colorado" with confidence level high. The common ethnicities for that genetic group is mostly Mesoamerican and Andean. I figure My Heritage must be mistaking a bit of Amerindian with some Iberian that I'm not aware of and combining it into Mexican American. Best guess.Quote:
Originally Posted by gixajo
So a lady that's helped me with the minority ancestry issue suggested I use some specific calculators at DNAGenics and a method of seeing what ancestry my results seem to gravitate to. So she said to check one each of what I know I am, such as German and English, then choose one northeast Asian, I choose Han Chinese, then check a bunch of Amerindian and see what it reveals. She said my result indicated likely Amerindian ancestry which she felt was confirmed by several ancient matches in the Genomelink Ancient Bloodlines report in the Americas. It's pretty confusing but interesting.
This is the type of result I'd get from the above settings at DNAGenics:
https://i.postimg.cc/y63KZZY1/Screen...106-162900.jpg
Target: Christine__scaledQuote:
Originally Posted by Christine Eckard
Distance: 0.0215% / 0.02147271 | ADC: 0.5x RC
46.9 Germany
46.3 Belgium
6.8 Turkey
Target: Christine__scaled
Distance: 0.0193% / 0.01927877 | R4P
60.7 England
19.9 Italy
17.7 Belarus
1.7 Kirghizstan
Target: Christine__scaled
Distance: 0.0203% / 0.02030693 | R3P
66.3 England
18.3 Belarus
15.4 Israel
Hmm interesting. I'll add the Native American may just be a misread showing overlap with Ancestral North Eurasians which are a component to western steppe herders like the Yamnaya culture.
Well that's what I've tried to figure out. There is clearly some genetic overlap between Amerind and Eurasian. The point of putting Han Chinese into the DNAGenics calculator was to discern which side of the Pacific were the genetics pointing to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Aside from that, my Genomelink ancient samples that point toward Amerind are:
Ancient Beringian Toddler 0.24%
Paleoindian Woman of the Andes 0.07%
Belizean Hunter-Gatherer 0.12%
Ancient Argentine Well Digger 0.06%
Archaic Peruvian Male 0.05%
Brazilian Potter Woman 0.06%
Medieval Age Caribbean Man 0.12%
I'd love to know the result of anyone from Europe or certified non-admixed European heritage of this test to see if they're getting anything like this.
I get native american matches on genomelink too:Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Eckard
California Native American Woman
SN-04
0.53% DNA match
Paleoindian Woman of the Maya Mountains
I3443
Ancient Beringian Toddler
Cuban Fisherman
GUY002
Which causes me to question if they have the algorithm "too loose" so to speak.
What's your ancestry?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus