Final Realistic Iberian Calculator

People with any mixed NW/European or Eastern Euro heritage should adjust accordingly, mixed NW + Iberian comes closest to those Halstatt samples.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vader

Target: LusoGF_Simulated
Distance: 5.0221% / 0.05022093
47.6 Proto-Celts
26.6 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
25.8 Imperial_Romans

---

Your girlfriend is not of Iberian descent or only partially based on these results. Am I right? :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vader

G25 inflates north African with the reference you're using... And on g25 in general due to ancestral nafri being so old it has issues. Hence why qpadm is a better solution. On ruderico's models I get 11% nafri exactly... Not sure what references he uses but head over to anthrogenica to ask him if you want. I believe you were wondering in pm.

---

I've updated the samples, so it should be much better now, I think, at least it was with the tests I did.

Target: Defcon2_scaled
Distance: 2.5717% / 0.02571702
38.6 Proto-Celts
28.2 Iberia_BA
22.8 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
10.4 Berbers_&_Guanches

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Defcon2

Target: Defcon2_scaled
Distance: 2.5717% / 0.02571702
38.6 Proto-Celts
28.2 Iberia_BA
22.8 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
10.4 Berbers_&_Guanches

---

Are you a from western Spain? Berbers_&_Guanches seems too high, for a Catalan.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jgab602

Are you a from western Spain? Berbers_&_Guanches seems too high, for a Catalan.

---

Yes, my parents are from Extremadura xD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Defcon2

Target: Defcon2_scaled
Distance: 2.5717% / 0.02571702
38.6 Proto-Celts
28.2 Iberia_BA
22.8 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
10.4 Berbers_&_Guanches

---

22,8 Greeks-Colonies/Romans? que callado te lo tenías.

Target: Gil_Vicente
Distance: 1.6517% / 0.01651689
53.4 Proto-Celts
23.6 Iberia_BA
11.8 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
11.2 Berbers_&_Guanches

Replacing Gauls:


Target: Gil_Vicente
Distance: 1.4243% / 0.01424347
45.8 Gauls
26.4 Iberia_BA
13.2 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
10.2 Berbers_&_Guanches
4.4 Phoenicians_of_Iberia

Adding Visigoths:


Target: Gil_Vicente
Distance: 1.3910% / 0.01391002
33.0 Gauls
25.2 Iberia_BA
12.6 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
11.8 Visigoth
9.6 Berbers_&_Guanches
7.8 Phoenicians_of_Iberia

With everyone:

Target: Gil_Vicente
Distance: 1.3908% / 0.01390774
33.0 Gauls
25.4 Iberia_BA
13.0 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
11.4 Visigoth
9.8 Berbers_&_Guanches
7.0 Phoenicians_of_Iberia
0.4 Proto-Celts

So the fit gets better as i add populations. Of course "Gauls" doesn't make sense to me as a southern portuguese, so i suspect something similar might be missing, maybe west iberia IA celtic speaking samples.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jingle Bell

what? but im not using iberian germanics, im using 2 Iberians samples which lived before the settlers of Goths, showing that they alr are like modern iberians, showing that germaniics had a few impact

---

When other users add Visigoth though, they get some percentage from it. I don't think Goths had a significant impact, but maybe 5-10%, so worth including imo. And in the example you showed, the second sample is slightly more Germanic shifted.

There is Germanic autosomal admixture in Iberians (higher in west Iberia than east) and any model without Germanic proxy is thus inadequate.